Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01855399

Technologically Enhanced Coaching: A Program to Improve Diabetes Outcomes

Peer support programs have been demonstrated to improve glycemic control among Veterans with poor control. This program will expand on this success by putting innovative tools in the hands of Veteran diabetes patients. Veteran coaches who have demonstrated effective control of their own diabetes will be trained to use communication skills to guide their peers through a diabetes education and decision aid. This tool, which is an iPad application, draws the patient in by showing them their personal risk and medication information derived from baseline labs and self-reported survey data. The tool encourages interaction by providing choices of materials to view, using audio-visual elements and incorporating a goal-setting process for developing self-management action steps and questions to discuss with their doctor at their next clinic visit. Ongoing weekly contact between the Veterans is supported by a confidential phone system.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–99 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Peer mentoring and support models have been found in two recent VA Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) to be more effective than usual care, financial incentives, and usual nurse care management to improve glycemic control in high-risk Veteran patients with poor glycemic control. Such models are important complements to provision of care by formal health care providers as they provide sustained, flexible between-visit support. Peer supporters and coaches can be trained in effective behavioral approaches to support other Veterans' self-management behaviors. Such supporters, however, necessarily lack the content expertise to help Veterans make informed treatment decisions and set health goals with their health care providers. Accordingly, in a recent study the investigators developed and tested a tailored, interactive computer-based tool with diabetes and medication information embedded in the tool's software that peer coaches and other outreach workers can employ to facilitate discussions with patients. Such tailored, interactive tools have been found to be more effective than generic educational and decision support tools in improving clinical and patient-centered outcomes. Moreover, these tools could enhance the sustainability and effectiveness of coaching programs to better prepare patients to set self-management goals and action plans, and to discuss treatment options with their health care providers. With VA support and input from Veterans, the investigators adapted the tailored, interactive computer-based tool for use with and by Veterans with diabetes. The investigators now propose to incorporate this tool into a peer mentor-led diabetes self-management coaching program among predominantly African American Veterans with poor glycemic control at the Detroit VA, a VA health system with high rates of poor risk factor control among diabetes patients. The investigators propose to evaluate this Technology-Enhanced Coaching (TEC) program. Specifically, the investigators propose to:

Aim 1: Test the effectiveness of a technology-enhanced peer coaching (TEC) program in improving glucose control relative to peer coaching without technology enhancement; and, also test the effectiveness of peer support compared to observed usual care. For the "usual care" observed group, the investigators will use electronic health record data to measure A1c levels.

Aim 2: Assess the impact of the intervention on key patient-centered outcomes, including patients' satisfaction and involvement with care, perceived social support, diabetes-specific quality of life, and medication adherence.

Aim 3: Identify patient characteristics associated with engagement in the intervention and mediators and moderators of the intervention's impact on patient outcomes.

In summary, the TEC program builds on the demonstrated strengths of peer support models and of tailored, interactive decision support tools in improving diabetes self-management and outcomes. This study will test incorporation of tailored interactive educational tools into a peer coaching model found in prior VA RCTs to be effective in improving diabetes outcomes.

The tools tested in the proposed intervention will be disseminated for use in other VA sites through a tool kit with training and support materials. Because the intervention addresses barriers to disease management for chronically ill patients, physicians, and case managers, the study may have broader impact on management practices for other chronic illnesses.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • one hospitalization with a diabetes-related ICD-9 code
  • two outpatient visits with a diabetes-related ICD-9 code
  • at least one prescription for a glucose control medication (insulin or oral agents) or monitoring supplies.
  • [70] Potential participants must also have their most recent A1c in the prior 6 months be at least 8.0% if age < 70 or at least 8.5% if age 70+).

Exclusion criteria

  • Using ICD-9 diagnostic codes, the investigators will exclude patients if they have an active substance abuse disorder or serious psychiatric illness:
  • PTSD
  • bipolar disorder
  • dementia
  • schizophrenia
  • or personality disorders
  • We will then send names of the patients to their primary care providers to identify any patients who they do not recommend inviting to participate in the program.

Treatment and study plan

Peer Coaching

Behavioral

All participants will be assigned to a peer coach, who is a Detroit VA diabetes patient who previously had poor glycemic control but is currently in good control. Participants will receive information on their lab and blood pressure values and will be scheduled for an initial visit with their coach. The coach will then help them list questions and concerns they wish to discuss with their health care provider, practice raising their questions and concerns, and develop an action plan to address barriers to self-management they have identified. During the next six months, coaches will call their assigned peers once a week to provide support for their action steps.

Decision aid

Behavioral

The iDecide tool is designed to present key tailored, evidence-based information on diabetes and diabetes treatments. Importantly for a peer support intervention, all content information will be provided through the tool, with the role of the peer mentor being to assist the participant to go through the program and participate in helping the patient formulate questions and concerns to discuss with their health care provider, to set their own behavioral goals and action steps, and to help the participant practice raising the issues they plan to discuss with their health care provider.

Other names: TEC

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin

    Time frame: 6 Month

    Percent glycosylated hemoglobin is measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months to test the effectiveness of a technology-enhanced peer coaching (TEC) program in improving glucose control relative to peer support alone.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development

Fed

Registry information

Official study title

Technologically Enhanced Coaching (TEC):A Program for Improving Diabetes Outcomes

Acronym: VA-TEC

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
May 16, 2013
Registry last updated
Jul 12, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.