Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00630513

T.E.A. Study Three Days Ertapenem Versus Three Days Ampicillin- Sulbactam

The aim of the study was to compare the activity (efficacy and safety) of Ertapenem administered according to a short treatment for three days versus a short treatment for three days with AS in patients with an community acquired IAI of mild to moderate severity.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital - University of Bologna

Bologna, Italy

About this study

The study project is a prospective, randomized controlled investigation. The study will be performed in the Department of Transplant, General and Emergency Surgery of St Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital (Bologna, Italy), a large teaching institution, with the participation of all surgeons who accept to be involved in.

The study is designed and conducted in compliance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice regulations.

The tolerability and efficacy of a 3 days treatment with Ampicillin- Sulbactam (AS 3g x 3/ day i.v.) is compared a 3 days regimen with Ertapenem (1 g/day i.v.). in patients with localized peritonitis with a blinded evaluation of efficacy end points. Evaluation of cure or failure is blinded by use of designated third party individuals who are unaware of the treatment assigned to the patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Adult patients ( > 18 years) requiring surgical intervention within 24 hours of diagnosis, for localized IAI infections (i.e extending beyond the organ wall but confined near the hollow viscus, mild to moderate in severity):

  • Acute appendicitis: Ruptured or perforated with abscess
  • Acute diverticulitis with perforation and/or abscess
  • Acute cholecystitis (including gangrenous) with either rupture or perforation
  • Acute gastric and duodenal ( > 24 hours) perforation
  • Traumatic (> 12 hours) perforation of the intestines
  • Secondary peritonitis due to perforated viscus
  • Intra-abdominal abscess (including of liver and spleen)

Exclusion criteria

  • Traumatic bowel perforation requiring surgery within 12 hours
  • Perforation of gastroduodenal ulcers requiring surgery within 24 hours
  • other intra-abdominal processes in which the primary etiology was unlikely to be infectious.
  • Patients lactating or pregnant
  • Patients with a history of allergy, hypersensitivity, or any severe reaction to the study antibiotics
  • Patients with rapidly progressive or terminal illness;
  • Patients with a history or presence of severe hepatic or renal disease (e.g. creatinine clearance < 0.5 ml/min/1.73 m2);
  • Patients with a concomitant infection that would interfere with evaluation of response to the study antibiotics.

Treatment and study plan

Ertapenem

Drug

3 days regimen with Ertapenem (1 g/day i.v.)

Ampicillin-sulbactam

Drug

3 days treatment with Ampicillin-Sulbactam (AS 3g x 3/ day i.v.)

Primary outcomes

  1. Compare the failure rate of short therapy with Ertapenem and with AS in localized IAI

    Time frame: 3 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Any other complication

    Time frame: intraoperatively, postoperatively, at discharge, at 7-days, 1-month, 6-months follow-up

  2. The total costs of antibiotic therapy

    Time frame: during hospital stay

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Bologna

Other

Collaborators

  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Double-blind, Multi Center, Randomized Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Ertapenem 3 Days Versus Ampicillin-Sulbactam 3 Days in the Treatment of Localized Community Acquired Intra-abdominal Infection (IAI). (T.E.A. Study Three Days Ertapenem vs Three Days Ampicillin- Sulbactam)

Acronym: TEA

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Mar 7, 2008
Registry last updated
Aug 18, 2011

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.