Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Daegu, ASI|KR|KS002|TAEGU, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT01732367
This study will provide a rationale for switch from lamivudine plus adefovir to tenofovir monotherapy in Lamivudine plus Adefovir Treated Lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients with Undetectable Hepatitis B Virus DNA
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Daegu, ASI|KR|KS002|TAEGU, South Korea
Recently, in Korea, long-term medication of antiviral agents and their resulting resistance expression have been the most serious cause of failure to treat chronic hepatitis B. Exp.
In particular, the annual resistance rate to lamivudine currently widely being used in Korea amounts to about 15 to 20 percents and the rate is expected to reach 70 to 80 percent in four to five years.
The guidelines by the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) recommend a combination therapy with adefovir or tenofovir for patients with lamivudine resistant HBV .
In Korea, however, in case of combined prescription of lamivudine and adefovir, only one of them is covered by the health insurance and therefore many patients are difficult to continue treatment due to their economic conditions.
Tenofovir that has been developed most recently and will be placed on sale sooner or later in Korea has strong antiviral effects, causes little or no emergence of resistant viruses, and is known to have lower nephrotoxicity than adefovir.
In particular, several papers reported that tenofovir has effective and sustaining antiviral effects in patients who had other antiviral agents resistant HBV as well as those who received initial treatment. This shows that patients only with lamivudine resistant HBV can be treated only with tenofovir without a combination therapy and when they have low levels of HBV DNA, treatment is relatively effective despite their resistance to adefovir.
Therefore, it is considered that tenofovir switching therapy in patients with undetectable HBV DNA after lamivudine plus adefovir combination therapy to maintain their virus response.
The results of this study will provide a rationale for switch from lamivudine plus adefovir to tenofovir monotherapy in such patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Lamivudine 100mg QD for 96 weeks + Adefovir 10mg QD for 96 weeks
Other names: Zeffix, Hepsera
Tenofovir 300mg QD for 96 weeks
Other names: Viread
Time frame: Week 96 while on treatment
Percentage number of patients with virus reactivation (HBV DNA > 40 IU/mL on two consecutive samples taken 1 month apart, or persistent HBV DNA levels of 20-40 IU/mL on three consecutive 1 month interval) at Week 96 while on treatment.
Time frame: Week 96 while on treatment
Virologic response Percentage number of patients with virus reactivation at Week 48
Time frame: Week 96 while on treatment
Antiviral resistance percentage number of patients who developed drug resistant mutation at Week 48 and 96 while on randomized therapy.
Time frame: Week 96 while on treatment
Biochemical response percentage number of patients with biochemical breakthrough at Week 48 and 96
Time frame: Week 96 while on treatment
Serologic response (1) HBeAg loss/seroconversion in HBeAg-positive CHB Percentage number of patients with HBeAg loss or seroconversion at Week 48 and 96.
Time frame: Week 96 while on treatment
Safety assessment
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Other
Randomized Trial of Tenofovir Versus Lamivudine Plus Adefovir in Lamivudine Plus Adefovir Treated Lamivudine-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Undetectable Hepatitis B Virus DNA.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07730736
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Foshan, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05630820
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Centreville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05630807
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07595159
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details