Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03255837

tDCS on Working Memory (WM) in Adults With ASD

This study will involve an experiment in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) comparing their performance on a working memory task before, during and after non-invasive brain stimulation (tDCS) compared to a control group in a 3x3 factorial design. How the stimulation affects performance on the task will be assessed, along with the impact of the intervention on the individuals.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Glasgow

Glasgow, United Kingdom

About this study

Many studies have examined working memory in people with autism spectrum disorder as working memory deficits in individuals with autism spectrum disorder leads to multiple difficulties associated with behaviour regulation, cognitive flexibility, abstract thinking, and focusing and sustaining attention. Evidence suggests that transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex leads to an increase in working memory performance in typically developing individuals. This may have important benefits for people with autism spectrum disorder since autism spectrum disorder is known to be associated with working memory deficiencies. This study will build on a pilot study conducted in 2014, the experiment tested participants working memory scores on an N-back test, after receiving anodal (positive stimulation) stimulation for 15 minutes over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. This task requires the participant to perform multiple cognitive operations, including encoding of new stimuli, updating and maintaining past stimuli, and recognising and responding to whether each new stimulus matches the three-back stimulus. Participants are presented with a random set of ten letters (from A-Z). A different letter will be displayed every 2s, participants will be required to respond (key press 1) if the presented letter was the same as the letter presented three stimuli previously (a target). If it was not a target, participants were required to respond with key press 2. In this test, a total of 30 correct responses are possible. Participants will perform the task three times to reduce variability. Accuracy (number of correct responses), error rate (number of incorrect responses), and reaction time (interval between target presentation and pressing 1 or 2) will be recorded. Based on the findings from the pilot study, a full study will be conducted to investigate the effects of anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on adults with high-functioning autism, as well as test whether the effects of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is dependent on polarity (anodal versus cathodal (negative stimulation) stimulation).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • clinical diagnosis of ASD
  • right handed
  • speaks English fluently
  • normal vision or corrected to normal
  • passing tDCS safety screening

Exclusion criteria

  • participants who do not understand verbal or written English (i.e would be in need of translators)
  • participants that have ever suffered from epilepsy, febrile convulsions in infancy or had recurrent fainting spells
  • family history of epilepsy
  • has a heart pacemaker, cochlear implant, medication pump, surgical clips
  • has drunk more than 3 units of alcohol in the last 24 hours
  • suffers from migraines
  • metal in the head, implanted brain medical devices
  • has undergone a neurosurgical procedure
  • has had more than one cup of coffee, or other sources of caffeine in the last hour
  • taking any unprescribed or prescribed medication that might effect tDCS
  • medications or psychoactive drugs that can lower seizure threshold [imipramine, amitriptyline, doxepine, nortriptyline, maprotiline, chlorpromazine, clozapine, foscarnet, ganciclovir, ritonavir, amphetamines, cocaine, (MDMA, ecstasy), phencyclidine (PCP, angel dust), ketamine, gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), alcohol, theophylline]
  • withdrawal from alcohol, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, meprobamate, chloral hydrate

Treatment and study plan

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Device

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS, a form of non-invasive brain stimulation) on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)

Primary outcomes

  1. Working memory accuracy score compared to typically developed controls scores.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (before stimulation) to after stimulation (1 week)

    Result of N-back memory task

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in working memory accuracy score between adults with ASD and healthy controls

    Time frame: Before stimulation

    Result of N-back memory task

  2. Difference in working memory accuracy score between adults with ASD and healthy controls

    Time frame: After stimulation (1 week)

    Result of N-back memory task

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Glasgow

Registry information

Official study title

A Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial of Anodal Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation (tDCS) Against Cathodal and Sham Stimulation in Adults With High-Functioning Autism

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Aug 21, 2017
Registry last updated
Jan 25, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.