Suez Canal University Hospitals - Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinics
Ismailia, 41522, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07291791
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common condition that causes long-lasting knee pain and difficulty with daily activities. Many patients have pain that is stronger than expected from joint changes because the nervous system becomes more sensitive to pain. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique that uses a small electrical current applied to the scalp to help reduce pain sensitivity.
This study will test whether active tDCS over the primary motor cortex can reduce pain and improve function in people with knee osteoarthritis. A total of 102 participants will be randomly assigned to receive either active tDCS or sham (placebo) stimulation. All participants will receive 15 sessions over three weeks. We will measure pain intensity, pain sensitivity, physical function, depression, cognition, and quality of life before the treatment, after the 3-week treatment program, and again at the 1-month follow-up.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me35 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ismailia, 41522, Egypt
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a major cause of chronic pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. In many patients, the severity of pain exceeds structural joint damage due to peripheral and central sensitization, including impaired conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Such dysfunction in descending inhibitory pathways contributes to pain amplification and poor response to standard treatments. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique capable of modulating cortical excitability, enhancing descending inhibition, and potentially restoring altered pain processing mechanisms.
This randomized, assessor- and participant-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial will investigate the neuromodulatory effects of anodal primary motor cortex (M1) tDCS in patients with KOA exhibiting impaired CPM. A total of 102 participants who meet eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either active anodal M1-tDCS (2 mA, 20 minutes per session) or sham stimulation, using identical electrode placement and brief initial stimulation to maintain blinding. Both groups will receive 15 sessions administered over three consecutive weeks.
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-month follow-up. Primary outcomes include changes in pain intensity measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Secondary outcomes include peripheral and central sensitization measures-Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM), Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), and PainDETECT-as well as functional outcomes assessed using the WOMAC index, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and One-Leg Stance. Additional outcomes include depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI), cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE), and health-related quality of life (SF-12).
This study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the analgesic and neuromodulatory effects of tDCS in KOA, and to clarify its impact on pain modulation, pain sensitization, physical function, depression, cognition, and overall quality of life.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will be excluded if they have any condition that could affect cortical excitability, confound outcome measures, or interfere with tDCS safety, including:
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that applies low-intensity direct current to modulate cortical excitability. In this trial, stimulation is delivered over the primary motor cortex (M1) using saline-soaked sponge electrodes. For the active arm, anodal tDCS is applied at 2 mA for 20 minutes per session, for 15 sessions over three weeks. For the sham arm, the same electrode placement and device settings are used, but the current is ramped down after approximately 30 seconds to mimic the sensation of active stimulation without producing neuromodulatory effects.
Other names: tDCS
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up.
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The primary outcome is the change in VAS and BPI pain scores from baseline to immediately post-intervention and one-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing the 15 treatment sessions, and at 1-month follow-up
PPT will be assessed using a digital pressure algometer at two standardized locations on the affected side-the medial knee joint line and the ipsilateral lower leg-to evaluate peripheral sensitization, as well as at a remote site on the forearm to assess central sensitization. The primary outcome will be the change in mean PPT values across three time points: baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
Central sensitization symptoms will be assessed using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). The outcome is the change in CSI total score (0-100) between baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
CPM efficiency will be evaluated using the submaximal-effort tourniquet test. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) will be measured immediately before and after the conditioning stimulus. CPM efficiency will be calculated as the ratio of pre-conditioning PPT to post-conditioning PPT. A pre-to-post stimulus PPT ratio greater than or equal to 1 (indicating no change or a reduction in PPT after conditioning) will be classified as impaired CPM, reflecting deficient descending inhibitory pain modulation. The outcome is the change in CPM efficiency across baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
Neuropathic-like pain features will be assessed using the PainDETECT questionnaire. The outcome is the change in PainDETECT total score across baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
Pain, stiffness, and physical function will be evaluated using the WOMAC questionnaire. Higher WOMAC scores indicate greater physical dysfunction. The outcome is the change in WOMAC total and subscale scores from baseline to post-intervention and follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
Functional performance will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test for functional mobility and the One-Leg Stance (OLS) test for balance. The outcome is defined as the change in TUG completion time and the change in maximum OLS stance duration (in seconds) across baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The outcome is the change in total BDI score between baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
Cognitive function will be evaluated using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The outcome is the change in MMSE score across baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the SF-12 questionnaire. The outcome is the change in physical and mental component summary scores from baseline to post-intervention and 1-month follow-up.
Suez Canal University
Other
Evaluation of the Neuromodulatory Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: KOA-tDCS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07717957
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
View Trial DetailsNCT03112200
Arthritis, Bone Marrow Edema
Encinitas, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07568691
Arthritis, Balance Board
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT05562271
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial Details