Aretaieion University Hospital
Athens, Greece
NCT Number: NCT07351981
Objectives
* Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous PRF treatment in reducing knee pain compared to a sham intervention * Secondary Objectives: To assess the improvement in functional outcomes and patient satisfaction following PRF treatment.
Study Design
* Type: Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. * Duration: 6 months * Study Population: Adults aged 40-75 years with chronic knee pain (lasting ≥ 6 months) due to osteoarthritis (OA). * How many patients in each group: 25 patients in each group (according to Janssens et al, 2024) Inclusion Criteria * Diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis according to NICE criteria. * Chronic knee pain (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] ≥ 4). * Failure to respond adequately to conventional treatments (e.g., NSAIDs, physical therapy). * Willingness to comply with study procedures. Exclusion Criteria * Previous PRF/RF treatment for knee pain. * Hyaluronic acid injection for knee pain in the past 6 months * Knee surgery within the last 6 months. * Severe cardiovascular, neurological, or psychiatric conditions. * Active systemic infections or local skin infections at the knee. * Pregnancy or lactation.
Interested in participating?
Request Info45 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Athens, Greece
Randomization and Blinding
Intervention Both groups will receive disposable electrodes on either side of the knee: one skin electrode on the inside and one on the outside of the knee.
Outcome Measures Primary Outcome • Pain Reduction: Measured using the NRS (numerical rating scale) at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at follow-up intervals (2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks).
Secondary Outcomes
Data Collection and Management
Ethical Considerations
Monitoring and Safety
Dissemination of Results
Timeline
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
application of TcPRF patches
Transdermal patch will be connected to demo mode of the spring pulsed rf generator. no treatment will be given
Time frame: 12 weeks
Measured using the NRS (numerical rating scale) at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at follow-up intervals (2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks).
Time frame: 12 weeks
Assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Measured using a Likert scale for overall satisfaction with treatment.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Other
Randomized Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) Treatment for Knee Pain
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06963892
Arthritis, Hip
Chertsey, Surrey, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06711341
Arthritis, Behavior
Bursa, Nilüfer, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07478861
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Banī Suwayf, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04315103
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
View Trial Details