Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05190081

Task Training In Older Adults With Age-Related Hearing Loss

This study aimed to examine the effects of single and dual-task training on physical function, cognitive function, quality of life, balance, concerns about falling, and activities of daily living in the elderly with age-related hearing loss.

The elderly who were diagnosed with age-related hearing loss in Pamukkale University Health, Practice and Research Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology participated in the study. The elderly were allocated a single-task training group, dual-task training group, and control group. Thirteen patients in the single-task training group, 15 patients in the dual-task training group, 14 patients in the control group completed the study. Degrees of hearing loss were determined by pure tone audiometry. Evaluations, Senior Fitness Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, World Health Organization- Quality of Life- Old Module, Berg Balance Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale International, Functional Independence Measure, Dual Task Questionnaire, Dual Task Effect, were performed initially, after the interventions and at the 6th month. The interventions were carried out two days a week and 40 minutes, for five weeks.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Hearing Loss Age Related Hearing Loss Ear Diseases Hearing Disorders Hearing Loss, Sensorineural Labyrinth Diseases Nervous System Diseases Neurologic Manifestations Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Physical Disability Presbycusis Sensation Disorders Signs and Symptoms Vestibular Disease Vestibular Diseases

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Pamukkale University

Denizli, Kinikli, 20070, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Outcome Measures Physical function, cognitive function, auditory function, quality of life, balance, concerns about falling, independence in activities of daily living, and dual-task performance were evaluated. Older adults were evaluated initially, after the dual-task and single-task training, and at 6th month for long-term control. All evaluations and interventions were carried out in an isolated and quiet environment in the examination room of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology.

Interventions A special program including motor and cognitive tasks was prepared. Both lower and upper extremity motor tasks and verbal, arithmetic, auditory, and visual cognitive tasks were planned based on evidence. Tasks were completed at the same time in the dual-task training group, were completed separately in the single-task training group. No intervention was performed in the control group. The dual-task and single-task training were held 2 days a week, 40 minutes, for a total of 10 sessions for 5 weeks. A patient-appropriate task was selected for each cognitive task each week. It has been tried to prevent the learning effect by providing individual and weekly progress according to the patients' performance in the tasks in the motor and cognitive parts. Variable priority instructions were used in the dual-task training group, and fixed priority instructions were used in the single-task training group. At the beginning and end of the intervention programs, 7 types of warm-up and cool-down exercises involving large muscle groups were performed for 10-minutes. Each task in the intervention programs was performed for 60 seconds and/or 10 repetitions.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being >65 years old
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale score > 21
  • Diagnosed with Age-Related Hearing Loss
  • Having bilateral symmetrical hearing loss (average ±10dB difference)
  • Having normal visual functions
  • Ability to ambulate independently (may use a self-help device)

Exclusion criteria

  • Using a hearing aid
  • Receiving a physical therapy intervention for Age-Related Hearing Loss
  • Having an orthopedic or neurological condition that may affect cognition or postural control
  • Using medication that may affect cognition or postural control
  • Having vertigo or being hospitalized in the emergency room due to vertigo attacks
  • Missing or refusing the follow-up

Treatment and study plan

Task training

Other

A special program including motor and cognitive tasks was prepared. Both lower and upper extremity motor tasks and verbal, arithmetic, auditory, and visual cognitive tasks were planned based on evidence. The dual-task and single-task training were held 2 days a week, 40 minutes, for a total of 10 sessions for 5 weeks. A patient-appropriate task was selected for each cognitive task each week.

Primary outcomes

  1. Senior Fitness Test

    Time frame: Initially, 1st week

    This test is valid in the elderly population and provides comprehensive, continuous measurement, consisting of 6 sub-heading, including chair stand, arm curl, 2-minute step, chair sit-and-reach, back scratch, and 8-foot-up-and-go tests

  2. Senior Fitness Test

    Time frame: At 5th week

    This test is valid in the elderly population and provides comprehensive, continuous measurement, consisting of 6 sub-heading, including chair stand, arm curl, 2-minute step, chair sit-and-reach, back scratch, and 8-foot-up-and-go tests

  3. Senior Fitness Test

    Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month

    This test is valid in the elderly population and provides comprehensive, continuous measurement, consisting of 6 sub-heading, including chair stand, arm curl, 2-minute step, chair sit-and-reach, back scratch, and 8-foot-up-and-go tests

  4. Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    Time frame: Initially, 1st week

    It evaluates 8 different cognitive functions: visuospatial/executive functions, naming, attention, concentration and calculation, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The highest score is 30 in total. A score of 21 and above is considered normal

  5. Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    Time frame: At 5th week

    It evaluates 8 different cognitive functions: visuospatial/executive functions, naming, attention, concentration and calculation, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The highest score is 30 in total. A score of 21 and above is considered normal

  6. Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month

    It evaluates 8 different cognitive functions: visuospatial/executive functions, naming, attention, concentration and calculation, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The highest score is 30 in total. A score of 21 and above is considered normal

  7. Pure tone audiometry

    Time frame: Initially, 1st week

    Pure tone audiometry at 6 different frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 kHz) frequently mentioned in the literature was performed by an audiologist with a clinical audiometer

  8. World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old Module

    Time frame: Initially, 1st week

    It consists of 24 items in six facets. The facets of this module are "sensory abilities", "autonomy", "past, present and future activities", "social participation", "death and death", "intimacy". A high score indicates a high quality of life.

  9. World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old Module

    Time frame: At 5th week

    It consists of 24 items in six facets. The facets of this module are "sensory abilities", "autonomy", "past, present and future activities", "social participation", "death and death", "intimacy". A high score indicates a high quality of life.

  10. World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old Module

    Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month

    It consists of 24 items in six facets. The facets of this module are "sensory abilities", "autonomy", "past, present and future activities", "social participation", "death and death", "intimacy". A high score indicates a high quality of life.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Berg Balance Scale

    Time frame: Initially, 1st week

    It was designed to assess balance and determine fall risk in older adults (Berg et al, 1989). It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0 and 4 by observing the performance of the person for each instruction. The highest score is 56, 0-20 points indicate balance disorder, 21-40 points indicate that balance is maintained with assistance, and 41-56 points indicate the existence of a good balance

  2. Berg Balance Scale

    Time frame: At 5th week

    It was designed to assess balance and determine fall risk in older adults (Berg et al, 1989). It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0 and 4 by observing the performance of the person for each instruction. The highest score is 56, 0-20 points indicate balance disorder, 21-40 points indicate that balance is maintained with assistance, and 41-56 points indicate the existence of a good balance

  3. Berg Balance Scale

    Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month

    It was designed to assess balance and determine fall risk in older adults (Berg et al, 1989). It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0 and 4 by observing the performance of the person for each instruction. The highest score is 56, 0-20 points indicate balance disorder, 21-40 points indicate that balance is maintained with assistance, and 41-56 points indicate the existence of a good balance

  4. International Fall Efficiency Scale

    Time frame: Initially, 1st week

    : It is a patient-rated scale that determines the level of concerns about falling in activities. of daily living and the confidence to perform activities without fear of falling. It was developed by Tinetti et al. in 1990. The 16 questions in the scale were scored between 1-4. Validity and reliability studies have been established

  5. International Fall Efficiency Scale

    Time frame: At 5th week

    : It is a patient-rated scale that determines the level of concerns about falling in activities. of daily living and the confidence to perform activities without fear of falling. It was developed by Tinetti et al. in 1990. The 16 questions in the scale were scored between 1-4. Validity and reliability studies have been established

  6. International Fall Efficiency Scale

    Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month

    : It is a patient-rated scale that determines the level of concerns about falling in activities. of daily living and the confidence to perform activities without fear of falling. It was developed by Tinetti et al. in 1990. The 16 questions in the scale were scored between 1-4. Validity and reliability studies have been established

  7. Functional Independence Measurement

    Time frame: Initially, 1st week

    FIM was developed in 1987 and it indicates the degree of independence of a person in activities of daily living. The instrument includes 18 items under 6 subheadings: self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Each item is scored at 7 levels, with 'level 1' representing full assistance and 'level 7' representing complete independence. The total score is between 18-126.

  8. Functional Independence Measurement

    Time frame: At 5th week

    FIM was developed in 1987 and it indicates the degree of independence of a person in activities of daily living. The instrument includes 18 items under 6 subheadings: self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Each item is scored at 7 levels, with 'level 1' representing full assistance and 'level 7' representing complete independence. The total score is between 18-126.

  9. Functional Independence Measurement

    Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month

    FIM was developed in 1987 and it indicates the degree of independence of a person in activities of daily living. The instrument includes 18 items under 6 subheadings: self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Each item is scored at 7 levels, with 'level 1' representing full assistance and 'level 7' representing complete independence. The total score is between 18-126.

  10. Dual Task Questionnaire

    Time frame: Initially, 1st week

    : DTQ is used to provide information about the difficulties experienced in dual tasks related to daily living activities. It is a short test consisting of 10 questions. It has been used in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. It consists of 5 answers and is scored between 0-4. A score of "4" indicates that difficulties are experienced very often, and "0" indicates that there is no difficulty.

  11. Dual Task Questionnaire

    Time frame: At 5th week

    : DTQ is used to provide information about the difficulties experienced in dual tasks related to daily living activities. It is a short test consisting of 10 questions. It has been used in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. It consists of 5 answers and is scored between 0-4. A score of "4" indicates that difficulties are experienced very often, and "0" indicates that there is no difficulty.

  12. Dual Task Questionnaire

    Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month

    : DTQ is used to provide information about the difficulties experienced in dual tasks related to daily living activities. It is a short test consisting of 10 questions. It has been used in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. It consists of 5 answers and is scored between 0-4. A score of "4" indicates that difficulties are experienced very often, and "0" indicates that there is no difficulty.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pamukkale University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Investigation Of the Effects Of Dual-Task And Single-Task Training In Older Adults With Age-Related Hearing Loss

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jan 13, 2022
Registry last updated
Sep 29, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.