University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
NCT Number: NCT02602327
This is a phase I dose escalation study (3+3 design) with a dose expansion arm (12 patients) designed to evaluate safety of the combination of Tas-102 and radioembolization using Yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres for patients with chemotherapy-refractory liver-dominant chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Randomized studies have demonstrated that Tas-102 has single agent activity against chemotherapy refractory colorectal cancer. A recent pre-clinical study has shown that Tas-102 may have activity as a radiation sensitizer in bladder cancer cell lines. Benefit of single agent Tas-102 against chemotherapy refractory colon cancer and the drug's promise a radiosensitizer make Tas-102 a potential candidate drug for testing in combination with radioembolization using Yttrium-90 resin microspheres in patients with liver-dominant chemotherapy-refractory mCRC. This is a phase I dose escalation study with a dose expansion arm designed to evaluate safety of the combination of Tas-102 and radioembolization using 90Y resin microspheres for patients with chemotherapy-refractory colon or rectal adenocarcinoma metastatic to the liver.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Oral nucleoside antitumor agent consisting of α,α,α-trifluorothymidine (FTD) and 5-chloro-6-(2-iminopyrrolidin-1-yl) methyl-2,4 (1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione hydro chloride (TPI) at a molar ratio of 1:0.5.
Other names: Lonsurf
20-60mm resin microspheres containing Yttrium-90 (90Y, Y90) radioisotope
Other names: Yttrium-90 (Y90; 90Y) resin microspheres
Time frame: 56 days
Any adverse events grade ≥ 3 will be reviewed by the treating interventional radiologist and medical oncologist within 24 hours of being informed event. If none of the 3 patients in a cohort experiences a DLT, another 3 patients will be treated at the next higher dose level. However, if 1 of the first 3 patients experiences a DLT, 3 more patients will be treated at the same dose level. The dose escalation will continue until at least 2 patients among a cohort of 3-6 patients experience DLTs (i.e., ≥ 33% of patients with a dose-limiting toxicity at that dose level) or until 3-6 patients had been treated at TAS-102 dose of 35mg/m2 per day in 2 divided doses (up to a maximum of 80 mg per dose) administered concurrently with radioembolization cycles 1 and 2 without experiencing a DLT. DLT window will be 56 days (cycle 1, day 1 to cycle 2, day 28). Dose limiting toxicity will be reached when one of the clinical and/or laboratory parameters are met
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Traditional 3+3 design will be used to determine the recommended dose for the dose expansion phase will be defined as the dose level just below this toxic dose level.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Radiographic overall response rate (measured in accordance to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1) using imaging. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesionsStable Disease (SD): Small changes that do not meet the criteria for CR, PR, or Progressive Disease (PD): 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. ORR will be defined as a ratio of the number of patients who demonstrated complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the number of all evaluated patients.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
PFS will be defined as a time period that started at enrollment, during which a patient neither progressed nor died based on radiographic response.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
HPFS will be defined as a time period that started at enrollment, during which a patient neither progressed in the liver nor died based on radiographic response.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
EHPFS will be defined as a time period that started at enrollment, during which a patient neither progressed outside the liver nor died based on radiographic response
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Overall Survival will be analyzed 12 months after the last patient is enrolled. Overall survival will be assessed using a two-sided, log-rank test. The survival function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. In addition, two-sided 95% confidence intervals for the median overall survival will be computed
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Proportion of patients with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) response with ≥ 50% decline from baseline (in patients with baseline level ≥ 3.2) post combination therapy with Tas-102 and 90Y radioembolization. Maximum percent change will be calculated. CEA level will only be followed for participants with elevated level (≥3.2) at baseline.
University of California, San Francisco
Other
Phase I Study of Tas-102 and Radioembolization With 90Y Resin Microspheres for Chemo-refractory Colorectal Liver Metastases
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07736131
Colon Cancer, Colonic Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT05513742
Colon Cancer, Colonic Diseases
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05538195
Colon Cancer, Colonic Diseases
Henan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06698289
Atrophy, Colon Cancer
Mersin, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details