Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
NCT Number: NCT04603066
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over proof of concept study.
To determine the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of co-administration of 5-HT3R antagonist ondansetron with a P-glycoprotein inhibitor tariquidar, in patients with neuropathic pain.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
The investigators hypothesize that co-administration of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron (single 16mg dose) with p-glycoprotein inhibitor tariquidar (single 4mg/kg dose) vs placebo in a cross-over prospective randomized study, will:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In randomized order, each participant will receive two IV infusions of ondansetron, 3 weeks apart; one with placebo (D5W), and one with tariquidar (4mg/kg dose in D5W) administered IV over 60 minutes. Ondansetron will be diluted in 100mL 0.9% normal saline, and tariquidar will be diluted in 500mL D5W.
Other names: Ondansetron/Tariquidar
In randomized order, each participant will receive two IV infusions of ondansetron, 3 weeks apart; one with placebo (D5W), and one with tariquidar (4mg/kg dose in D5W) administered IV over 60 minutes. Ondansetron will be diluted in 100mL 0.9% normal saline, and tariquidar will be diluted in 500mL D5W.
Other names: Ondansetron/ Placebo
Time frame: Measurements over 240 minutes, extrapolated to infinity
AUCinf for Ondansetron concentration in plasma based on venous blood sampling for plasma concentrations of ondansetron obtained at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes from the beginning of ondansetron infusion.
Time frame: anytime between 0-240 minutes
The level of ondansetron in plasma and CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) in samples, taken around the same time, was measured, and the ratio of the two values was calculated. This ratio (partition coefficient, Kp) of ondansetron, compared between the two sessions, with placebo vs tariquidar
Time frame: baseline to 90 minutes after ondansetron IV infusion
Change in spontaneous pain intensity (measured on a 0-10 numerical rating scale; 0=no pain, 10=worst imaginable pain) from baseline to 90 minutes after ondansetron IV infusion, compared between two sessions with and without tariquidar. Values are presented as a percentage change from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and 90 minutes after the end of ondansetron infusion
Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) is a psychophysical test to assess the efficiency of descending pain inhibition. CPM is calculated as difference in heat pain threshold with and without pain conditioning - i.e. immersion of a hand in cold water. Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) Negative CPM values represent efficient pain modulation/inhibition.
This test was administered at baseline, and again 90-min after the end of ondansetron infusion. CPM values can range from -100 to 100, CPM<0 (i.e. decreased pain to heat stimulus following conditioning) implies descending pain inhibition.
CPM Magnitude (ΔCPM) is the calculated by subtracting the measurement of CPM at baseline [possible range of CPM scores 0-100] from the measurement of CPM 90 min after the intervention [possible range of CPM scores 0-100]. A larger negative ΔCPM value indicates increased pain modulation efficiency following treatment, and therefore, a desired outcome.
Time frame: 0-240 min from infusion
The association between baseline Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) magnitude (ΔCPM) and the % pain reduction from baseline will be determined by bivariate regression.
Time frame: baseline to 70 min after infusion
Changes in the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) total score will be compared between treatment sessions.
NPSI is a questionnaire used to assess and quantify neuropathic pain by asking patients to rate the severity of different pain sensations on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable. The version administered in the study consists of seven questions, each rated on a scale from 0 to 10, with the total score being the sum of all ratings.
The possible range of the NPSI score of the version administered in the study is 70, and, since we measure the difference in scores, the changes in the NPSI score of the version administered in the study is -70 to 70. Higher NPSI scores indicate more severe neuropathic pain symptoms. Since the analysis is conducted on changes in NPSI scores from baseline, a more negative value corresponds to a greater reduction in neuropathic pain symptoms following treatment.
Washington University School of Medicine
Other
Administration of Ondansetron With P-glycoprotein Inhibitor Tariquidar in Patients With Neuropathic Pain
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03848143
Nervous System Diseases, Neuralgia
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06750692
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05998369
Abdominal Pain, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06568042
Distal Sensory Polyneuropathy, Nervous System Diseases
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details