Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03373240

Targeting Self-regulatory Deficits Through Cognitive Remediation Intervention

We are proposing a small randomized clinical trial in which 100 substance users will complete the existing Psychotherapy Development Center (PDC) pretreatment assessment battery as well as a novel battery of assays to evaluate cognitive-affective functioning. After completing pretreatment assessments, participants will be randomized to either a (1) cognitive remediation program (training tasks) specifically designed to address cognitive-affective dysregulation or (2) control tasks (verbal fluency tasks). Tasks will be completed twice per week for 4 weeks, after which assessment batteries will be repeated. Finally, we will evaluate real-world behavior and the durability of the training via a one-month follow-up, which will include assessment of substance use as well as the cognitive-affective battery.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Drug Use Disorders Chemically-Induced Disorders Mental Disorders Substance-Related Disorders

Age range

18 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Substance Abuse Treatment Center (SATU)

New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, United States

About this study

Participants will be 100 individuals (aged 18 to 50) enrolled in outpatient (non- methadone/buprenorphine) treatment for any substance use disorder (other than PCP) at the Substance Abuse Treatment Unit in New Haven. As the goal of this project is to develop interventions that address self-regulation across multiple disorders, we will recruit individuals who have a range of substance use disorders and levels of severity. Our primary Specific Aim will be to evaluate the efficacy of the cognitive-remediation program relative to the control condition control on the indicators of cognitive-affective functioning and substance use, testing the hypothesis that individuals randomized to the cognitive remediation program will demonstrate improved functioning on the cognitive-affective battery as well as reduced real-world substance abuse. We will also explore potential moderators of response to the training, including baseline measures of cognitive-affective function.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Meet current DSM-5 criteria for an alcohol, stimulant, cannabis, or opioid use disorder.
  • Are sufficiently stable for 4 weeks of outpatient treatment.
  • Are willing to provide locator information.
  • Are fluent in English and have a 4th grader or higher reading level

Exclusion criteria

  • Meet DSM-5 criteria for a bipolar or schizophrenic disorder.
  • Who have a legal case pending such that incarceration during the 4-week protocol is likely.
  • Are physically dependent on alcohol, opioids or benzodiazepines or who report recent PCP use.
  • Have a baseline Shipley estimated IQ less than 70
  • Have 3 or more head injuries with loss of consciousness for over 30 minutes or lasting effects
  • Have a history of chronic illness or neurological disorders (e.g., epilepsy or stroke) that would complicate evaluation of effects of cognitive training

Treatment and study plan

TAU plus Cognitive Remediation Program

Behavioral

Treatment normally received at this clinic that generally includes individual or group sessions and regular urine monitoring PLUS computerized games that focus on cognitive-affective self-regulatory processes.

TAU plus Control Tasks

Behavioral

Treatment normally received at this clinic that generally includes individual or group sessions and regular urine monitoring PLUS a series of computerized word games.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Stop Signal Reaction Time

    Time frame: Training visit 1 through 4 weeks of training

    Improved functioning on cognitive-affective battery: Examining Stop Signal reaction time changed across the 4-week training period. A change score was calculated. A negative number indicates better inhibition over time.

  2. Change From Pre-Post in Substance Use

    Time frame: 4 weeks before First Training Session through the 4-week training period

    The cube root of the number of days the participant endorsed using their primary substance. The number of days was submitted to a cube root transformation given skewness and a change score was calculated (post minus pre). A negative number indicated decreased substance use over time.

  3. Change in Pre-Post Cognitive Affective Battery- Negative Urgency Subscale (Part of the Urgency, Premeditation (Lack of), Perseverance (Lack of), Sensation Seeking, Positive Urgency, Impulsive Behavior Scale)

    Time frame: from the week prior to training to the week after training

    Negative urgency (NU) subscale. The scale score range is 11-44. Higher values indicate stronger agreement with this pathway toward impulsivity. A change score was calculated. A negative number indicates less agreement with negative urgency.

  4. Change in Experimental Performance-Change in Percentage of Risky Choices Under Risk Condition of the Lottery Task

    Time frame: Training visit 1 through 4 weeks of training

    The percent of risky choices per session. This would indicate that the participant selected the lottery option that reflected a riskier bet.

    A change score was calculated. A negative number indicates improved decision-making (selecting fewer risky options).

  5. Change in Experimental Performance- Change in Percentage of Ambiguous Choices Under 24% Ambiguity in Lottery Task

    Time frame: Training visit 1 through 4 weeks of training

    Percent of choices the participant made that reflected selecting the ambiguous option.

    A change score was calculated. A negative number reflects improved decision-making (selecting more safe options).

  6. Change in Experimental Performance- Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT)

    Time frame: from the week prior to training (pre) to the week after training (post)

    Estimated change in percentage of trial attempts on round 3 of the PASAT. A positive number reflects more trial attempts in the third round of PASAT.

  7. Change in Pre-Post Cognitive Affective Battery: Digit Backwards

    Time frame: from the week prior to training (pre) to the week after training (post)

    Score on digit backwards. Fourteen strings of varying lengths (2 to 7 digits) are presented. A participant receives a point for each string they correctly repeat backwards. Range 0-14 points. Change score was calculated-positive values indicate improved working memory over time.

  8. Change in Pre-Post Cognitive Affective Battery: Breath Holding

    Time frame: from the week prior to training (pre) to the week after training (post)

    Negative emotionality-distress tolerance as measured by the difference between when the participant says they are uncomfortable and when they let go of holding their breath. Measured in seconds (this was natural log-transformed due to skewness for analyses). Positive change indicates improved distress tolerance over time.

  9. Change in Pre-Post Cognitive Affective Battery: Perceived Stress Scale

    Time frame: from the week prior to training (pre) to the week after training (post)

    Negative emotionality-perceived stress. The total score ranges from 0-4. Higher scores indicate a higher level of perceived stress. A change score was calculated. Negative change indicates an improvement (reduction in perceived stress) over time.

  10. Change in Pre-Post Cognitive Affective Battery: Delay Discounting

    Time frame: from the week prior to training (pre) to the week after training (post)

    Incentive salience- delay discounting. Five-Trial Adjusting-Delay Discounting Task (Koffarnus & Bickel, 2014) is a 5-item behavioral assessment used to estimate the extent to which individuals prefer smaller immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards. A discount rate (ln (k)) is calculated for each time the measure is used. Discount rates for the 5- trial delay task were calculated by taking the inverse of the obtained Effective Delay 50 value, which is equivalent to the value of k, when fitted to this singular point. Ln(k) is the natural log of the discount rate. A change score was calculated. Negative change indicates improved decision-making

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Yale University

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Dec 14, 2017
Registry last updated
Jan 8, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.