University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065, United States
NCT Number: NCT02129582
This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of targeted marrow irradiation when given with fludarabine phosphate and busulfan before donor progenitor cell transplant in treating patients with hematologic malignancies. Targeted marrow irradiation is a type of specialized radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the cancer cells, which may kill more cancer cells and cause less damage to normal cells. Giving targeted marrow irradiation and chemotherapy drugs, such as fludarabine phosphate and busulfan, before a donor progenitor cell transplant may help stop the growth of cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's progenitor cells. When the healthy progenitor cells from a donor are infused into the patient they may help the patient's bone marrow make progenitor cells, red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the maximum tolerated dose of targeted marrow irradiation given in combination with fludarabine (fludarabine phosphate) and busulfan as conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To describe the toxicity profile of the conditioning regimen of targeted marrow irradiation (TMI), fludarabine and busulfan for allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor transplantation.
II. To describe the use of two techniques of delivering TMI, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and TomoTherapy, on patient's computed tomography (CT) simulation images and describe differences in organ avoidance and target coverage, planning time, and treatment delivery time.
III. To determine the disease response status 100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation with the conditioning regimen of TMI, fludarabine and busulfan.
IV. To determine the rates of acute graft versus host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation with the conditioning regimen of TMI, fludarabine and busulfan.
OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study of TMI.
CONDITIONING: Patients undergo TMI twice daily (BID) on days -10 to -7. Patients also receive fludarabine phosphate intravenously (IV) over 1 hour on days -6 to -2 and busulfan IV or orally (PO) on days -5 and -4.
TRANSPLANT: Patients undergo allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplant on day 0.
GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE (GVHD) PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive anti-thymocyte globulin IV on days -3 and -2, tacrolimus IV or PO beginning on day -1 for at least 6 months with taper beginning at 4 months, and methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, 6, and 11.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 100 days, 6 months, and 12 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo TMI
Given IV
Other names: 2-F-ara-AMP, Beneflur, Fludara
Given IV or PO
Other names: BSF, BU, Misulfan, Mitosan, Myeloleukon
Undergo allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplant
Other names: MPCT
Given IV
Other names: ATG, ATGAM, lymphocyte immune globulin, Thymoglobulin
Given IV or PO
Other names: FK 506, Prograf
Given IV
Other names: amethopterin, Folex, methylaminopterin, Mexate, MTX
Correlative studies
Time frame: Up to day 32
Time frame: Up to day 32
Time frame: Day 100
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Will be compared between the two techniques of delivering TMI (VMAT and TomoTherapy) using patients' CT simulation images.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Will be compared between the two techniques of delivering TMI (VMAT and TomoTherapy) using patients' CT simulation images.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Will be compared between the two techniques of delivering TMI (VMAT and TomoTherapy) using patients' CT simulation images.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Will be compared between the two techniques of delivering TMI (VMAT and TomoTherapy) using patients' CT simulation images.
Time frame: Day 100
Time frame: Up to 100 days
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Other
Phase I Trial of Escalated Doses of Targeted Marrow Irradiation (TMI) Combined With Fludarabine and Busulfan as Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Transplantation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05972577
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05031897
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Philadephia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01572662
Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02890758
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details