Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv, N/A = Not Applicable, Israel
NCT Number: NCT02146495
The goal of this study is to test whether voluntary regulation of limbic system activation is possible in patients with fibromyalgia and to examine the neurobehavioral effects of specific neuromodulation of this circuit on somatosensory, limbic, and cognitive processes. This goal will be achieved by using a method previously developed for the construction of an fMRI-enriched EEG model ("EEG-Finger-Print", EFP) that selectively targets the amygdala BOLD activation (Amyg-EFP). The investigators conducted two studies: In the first study, the investigators conducted simultaneous recordings of EEG and fMRI during Amyg-EFP NF training on patients with FM. The main objective is to demonstrate target engagement following Amyg-EFP-NF training in FM patients. In the second study, the investigators aim to conduct a randomized clinical trial to examine the causal effect of the Amyg-EFP NF trial. The investigators will compare neurobehavioral effects between three groups. I. Amyg-EFP-NF group: a multisession NF trial using the Amyg-EFP model. II. Control group 1- sham-NF: a multisession NF trial using sham feedback. III. Control group 2: patients in this group will continue their usual treatment without intervention.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tel Aviv, N/A = Not Applicable, Israel
The current study aims to focus on the neural mechanism and brain-guided therapy of Fibromyalgia (FM); a chronic pain syndrome. Despite intense investigations, the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia remains elusive. Several studies demonstrated that morphological and functional changes in the central nervous system may play an important role in FM development and progression. The unknown etiopathology of FM contributed greatly to the absence of mechanism-specific cures. The insufficient treatment for FM, along with the understanding that CNS abnormality constitutes a major factor in FM pathophysiology, emphasizes the need for mechanism-based therapeutic intervention and opens the door for advanced neuromodulation techniques. Guided by this approach, the investigators aspired to establish a multi-function model with the potential to exert neuromodulation effects. To address this goal, the investigators employ a method previously developed for the construction of an fMRI-enriched EEG model ("EEG-Finger-Print", EFP). In this approach, EEG is used to predict specific brain activity, as measured by fMRI in a given region. Our main objective is to explore the neural mechanisms that underlie limbic neuromodulation and to gain a profound understanding of the functional processes that can potentially modify deficient functions in FM. The investigators intend to conduct two studies. In the first study, the investigators focus on the previously developed EFP model that selectively targets the amygdala BOLD activation (Amyg-EFP). The investigators aspired to investigate Amyg-EFP-NF effects on chronic pain in FM. To do so, the investigators conducted simultaneous recordings of EEG and fMRI during Amyg-EFP NF training on patients with FM. The main research objective of this study is to demonstrate target engagement following Amyg-EFP-NF training in FM patients. In the second study, the investigators aim to conduct a randomized clinical trial to examine the causal effect of the Amyg-EFP on patients with FM and to explore the clinical effect of this model on a wide range of symptoms related to FM. To examine the neural, clinical, and behavioral specific effects of the EFP-NF training, the investigators will implement a comprehensive clinical assessment. Furthermore, the investigators will conduct an MRI/fMRI scan before and after the EFP-NF trial, in order to explore the neural modification effects. Clinical follow-up will be conducted after 10-12 months from the post-intervention evaluation. The investigators will compare the neural, clinical, and behavioral effects between three groups. I. Amyg-EFP-NF group: a multisession NF trial using feedback driven by the Amyg-EFP model. II. Control group I- sham-NF: a multisession NF trial using sham feedback. III. Control group II: patients in this group will continue their usual treatment without any intervention. The investigators hypothesize that patients in the Amyg -EFP-NF group will exhibit wider and more robust changes in neural and behavioral outcomes associated with the wide range of symptoms related to FM. This study can significantly advance the understanding of the neural processes that mediate modification of somatic-affective functions in patients with FM and, therefore, enable the establishment of better treatment prediction and possibly more personalized procedures in future studies.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Neurofeedback training utilizing Amygdala Electrical Fingerprint (Amyg-EFP) methodology
Sham neurofeedback training based on a randomized artificial Amyg-EFP signal.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level
Scoring from 0 (no impairment) to 80 (maximum), with subscales ranging up to 10 (maximum).
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level
Ranges from 0 to 12 (highest severity).
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level
Ranges from 0 to 19 (highest level of pain distribution).
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level
Scores from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate better health).
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level
Ranges from 20 to 80 (highest anxiety level).
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level
Ranges from 0 to 63 (highest depression level).
Time frame: Change in symptoms at 10-12 months relative to the baseline level (Follow-up measure vs. Baseline)
Scoring from 0 (no impairment) to 80 (maximum), with subscales ranging up to 10 (maximum).
Time frame: Change in symptoms at 10-12 months relative to the baseline level (Follow-up measure vs. Baseline)
Ranges from 0 to 12 (highest severity).
Time frame: Change in symptoms at 10-12 months relative to the baseline level (Follow-up measure vs. Baseline)
Ranges from 0 to 19 (highest level of pain distribution).
Time frame: Change in symptoms at 10-12 months relative to the baseline level (Follow-up measure vs. Baseline)
Scores from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate better health).
Time frame: Change in symptoms at 10-12 months relative to the baseline level (Follow-up measure vs. Baseline)
Ranges from 20 to 80 (highest anxiety level).
Time frame: Change in symptoms at 10-12 months relative to the baseline level (Follow-up measure vs. Baseline)
Ranges from 0 to 63 (highest depression level).
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Simultaneous fMRI/EEG scan in order to identify whether the Amyg-EFP signal reliably predicts the amygdala BOLD activity
Time frame: Change in neural pattern immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level (Post-intervention vs. Baseline)
Measured via real-time fMRI; region of interest analysis in the amygdala; comparison between post vs pre scans: change in blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response to regulate > baseline condition during NF task.
Time frame: 1-10 weeks
Measured by change in Amyg-EFP power; based on the difference between regulate and baseline conditions during the neurofeedback cycles
Time frame: Change in pain level immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level (Post-intervention vs. Baseline)
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)- which assesses somatosensory function and provides thermal pain thresholds and sensory threshold.
Time frame: Change in sleep quality immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level (Post-intervention vs. Baseline)
The investigators were measured via one-night sleep monitoring using the WatchPAT-200 device.
While the specific range scores for sleep latency and sleep efficiency using the WatchPAT-200 are not explicitly detailed in the available documentation, it's generally accepted in sleep studies that normal sleep efficiency is considered to be 85% or higher. Normal sleep onset latency typically ranges from 10 to 25 minutes.
To evaluate sleep quality, the investigators calculate a combined score using two sleep metrics: sleep latency and sleep efficiency.
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Other Gov
Mechanistic Perspective on EEG Based Amygdala Driven NF in Fibromyalgia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07145788
Agnosia, Chronic Pain
Stuttgart, Auerbachstraße 112, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT07715877
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
The Bronx, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07661745
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Manresa, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07591766
Behavior, Fibromyalgia
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details