Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05189379

Targeted Extinction of Drug Cues During Sleep - Olfactory Cue Reactivity Task

The study aims to utilise olfactory stimulation in addition to the visual stimulation in cue reactivity tasks to enhance precision in measuring alcohol based cues in individuals diagnosed with heavy drinking. The study consists of one cue reactivity task with visual stimuli, another cue reactivity task with matching odour/visual stimuli and lastly a monetary incentive delay task.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit Mannheim

Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68159, Germany

About this study

The intention of the study is to enhance the measurement precision in image-based cue reactivity task by introducing a new level of stimuli in the form of odours. During the course of the functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) screening, participants are required to finish three tasks, namely; odour-based cue reactivity task (OCRT), image-based cue reactivity task(ICRT) and monetary incentive delay task (MID).

Participants will be randomly divided into two groups, one group will receive tasks in the following order: OCRT-MID-ICRT and the other group will receive them in the following order: ICRT-MID-OCRT. With this, the habituation effect from receiving odours during OCRT is expected to be balanced.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • An Heavy Drinking diagnosis, confirmed by Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
  • Ability to provide fully informed consent and to use self-rating scales in fMRI
  • Understanding of the German language

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe mental or physical illnesses
  • Insomnia
  • Any metal parts and pieces in the body
  • Claustrophobia; fear of confined spaces

Treatment and study plan

Non-Alcoholic Odour

Other

A chemical used in fragrances and flavouring with a smell close to a nutty, buttery structure. Used as a 1:100 deionised water dilution.

Other names: Coffee furanone, 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran-3-one

Alcoholic Odour

Other

Alcoholic beverage beer / Alcoholic beverage red wine / Alcoholic beverage brandy / The type of the Alcoholic Odour intervention will be presented in a participant-preference basis.

Other names: Beer, Wine, Schnapps

Non-Alcoholic Images

Other

Images of non-alcoholic items, namely; broom, duster, clothing iron, lightbulb, mat, mulch, penlight, rack, rock, kitchen scissors, trough, vent are presented in parallel with the non-alcoholic odour

Alcoholic Images

Other

Images of alcoholic items, namely, beer, wine, schnapps are presented in parallel with the alcoholic odour

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) signal within selected Regions of Interest (ROI)

    Time frame: Once during the fMRI experiment

    Change in brain activation in the form of BOLD signals within 3 groups of ROIs:

    • Memory related ROIs: Hippocampus, Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
    • Cognitive Control related ROIs: Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex
    • Reward related ROIs: Striatum (ventral and dorsal) and Insula
  2. Odour based cue reactivity task

    Time frame: Once during the fMRI screening

    A cue reactivity task based on the odours and images of alcoholic and non-alcoholic items. Adapted from Vollstädt-Klein et al., 2011.

    Subjects are presented with odours and images of alcoholic (beer, wine, schnapps) and non-alcoholic (odour: 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran-3-one / images: broom, duster, clothing iron, lightbulb, mat, mulch, penlight, rack, rock, kitchen scissors, trough, vent) items during an fMRI session in blocks. For non-alcoholic items, in each block 5 images from the same stimuli group are presented with the non-alcoholic odour. For alcoholic items, in each block there are 5 images from the selected stimuli group with the congruent odour.

    After each block subjects are asked to rate their liking and wanting towards the items that have been presented to them in two 1-5 scales. Blocks are pseudorandomised to maximise balance between groups and minimise the effect of habituation.

    Minimum 1: "not at all", maximum 5: "very much".

  3. Image based cue reactivity task

    Time frame: Once during the fMRI screening

    A cue reactivity task based on the images of alcoholic and non-alcoholic items. Adapted from Vollstädt-Klein et al., 2011.

    Subjects are presented with images of the alcoholic (beer, wine, schnapps) and the non-alcoholic (broom, duster, clothing iron, lightbulb, mat, mulch, penlight, rack, rock, kitchen scissors, trough, vent) items during an fMRI session in blocks. In each block there are 5 images from the same stimuli group. After each block subjects are asked to rate their liking and wanting towards the items that have been presented to them in two 1-5 scales. Blocks are pseudorandomised to maximise balance between groups and minimise the effect of habituation.

    Minimum 1: "not at all", maximum 5: "very much".

  4. Monetary incentive delay task

    Time frame: Once during the fMRI screening

    A task to invoke reward based activations in the subjects. Adapted from Kirsch et al., 2003.

    Subjects are presented 3 different stimulus conditions, each linked either to a positive monetary reward (a vertically oriented arrow pointing upward), a positive verbal feedback (a vertically oriented double-sided arrow) or a neutral no reward or feedback (a horizontally oriented double-sided arrow). After presentation of the two positive stimuli types, a flashing screen is presented and during the flashing screen if the subjects can press the button fast enough they will either win 1€ or they will be shown a positive verbal feedback depending on the positive stimuli type. The negative stimuli is followed by a 3 second black screen to include a control condition. Each stimulus condition is presented 10 times in a pseudorandom schedule with no more than two equal conditions in succession. The inter-trial interval randomly varies between 6-9 seconds.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Psychomotor Vigilance Test (Roach et al. 2006)

    Time frame: Once before the fMRI screening

    Task measuring the objective vigilance of subjects. To distinguish vigilance between the wake and the sleep conditions, following measures will be compared: Median reaction speed (1/reaction time) and percentage of lapses (number of lapses divided by the number of all valid stimuli, excluding false starts. Lapse >= 500 ms, false start < 100ms). The task is prepared in JsPsych, and administered with using a tablet connected to internet. Participant data is securely stored in an encrypted server.

  2. Stanford Sleepiness Scale (Hoddes et al. 1973)

    Time frame: Once before the fMRI screening

    Test measuring current level of alertness of subjects on a seven point scale. A high test score indicates a high level of sleepiness and conversely a low test score yields a low level of sleepiness. Test scores will be utilized as a pre-measurement alertness indicator for participants. The task is prepared in JsPsych, and administered with using a tablet connected to internet. Participant data is securely stored in an encrypted server.

  3. Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (Bohn et al. 1995)

    Time frame: Once before the fMRI screening

    Questionnaire on self-assessment of current craving of subjects. Consists of 8 items on a Likert-type scale from 1-7 where higher scores represent stronger alcohol urges. The task is prepared in JsPsych, and administered with using a tablet connected to internet. Participant data is securely stored in an encrypted server.

  4. Sniffin' Sticks Test (Burghardt®, Wedel, Germany)(Hummel et al., 1997)

    Time frame: Once before the fMRI screening

    A psychophysical test that is developed for assessing individuals reactions to the olfactory stimuli (Hummel et al., 1997). The 12-stick test from Burghardt is chosen for the study and it consists of identifying one of the four items that are presented with each of the twelve odourant sticks. At the end, with the aid of the identification score, the participant's olfaction capability is assessed.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim

Other

Registry information

Acronym: TEDDS_OCRT

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jan 12, 2022
Registry last updated
Jan 31, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.