University of São Paulo Medical School
São Paulo, 01246903, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT00789087
The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare radiological lung expansion after talc pleurodesis performed either by videothoracoscopy or chest tube and correlate it with clinical outcome. Secondary endpoints evaluated were: clinical efficacy, safety, quality of life and survival.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
São Paulo, 01246903, Brazil
Talc pleurodesis is the most popular method to control symptoms of recurrent malignant pleural effusion. The intrapleural talc delivery may be by videothoracoscopy and talc poudrage or talc slurry thought a chest tube and the best method is still controversial. Although the lung expansion is a key criteria for success of the procedure, its characteristics are poorly studied.
Patients were enrolled into two groups: videothoracoscopic talc poudrage (VT) and talc slurry through a chest tube (DT). Lung expansion was evaluated through chest CT scans obtained obtained in the first 7 days and 1, 3 and 6 months after pleurodesis. All examinations were revised by two independent observers. Clinical efficacy (considered as lack of new procedures during follow up), complications, drainage duration, hospital stay and quality of life (general and specific questionnaires) were also analyzed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Videothoracoscopic talc poudrage
Other names: Videothoracoscopic talc poudrage
Talc slurry through a chest tube
Other names: Talc slurry through a chest tube
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
University of Sao Paulo
Other
Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Results of Two Methods of Talc Pleurodesis in Patients With Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusion
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06436807
Ascites, Ascites, Malignant
Augsburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT06729931
Malignant Pleural Effusions, Neoplasms
Kathmandu, Nepal
View Trial DetailsNCT04235998
Malignant Pleural Effusion, Neoplasms
Næstved, Region Sjælland, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT01999985
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial Details