Quality-of-Life Assessment
OtherAncillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
NCT Number: NCT03968406
This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of talazoparib in combination with radiation therapy and to see how well they work in treating patients with gynecologic cancers that have come back after previous treatment (recurrent). Talazoparib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Giving talazoparib in combination with radiation therapy may work better in treating patients with gynecologic cancers.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To determine the safety, tolerability, and maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of talazoparib combining talazoparib and fractionated radiotherapy in patients with refractory or recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal, cervical, or vaginal or endometrial carcinoma.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the safety profile of talazoparib in combination with fractionated radiotherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancers.
II. To determine a preliminary anti-cancer activity of this combination at the MTD.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To explore the potential feasibility of using biomarkers in tumor tissue, whole blood or serum as predictive markers of treatment response.
II. To explore the impact of talazoparib when combined with radiotherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancers on 1) patient reported acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and 2) overall longitudinal quality of life at week 5 of therapy.
OUTLINE: This is a dose escalation study of talazoparib.
Patients receive talazoparib orally (PO) once daily (QD) beginning on days -10 to -7 and continuing for up to 8 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo radiation therapy 5 days a week (Monday-Friday) for up to 7 weeks.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and then every 6 months for up to 1 year.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Undergo radiation therapy
Other names: Cancer Radiotherapy, Irradiate, Irradiated, Irradiation, Radiation, Radiation Therapy, NOS, Radiotherapeutics, Radiotherapy, RT, Therapy, Radiation
Given PO
Other names: BMN 673, BMN-673
Time frame: Up to 30 days
MTD is determined by dose limiting toxicity (DLT). The MTD will be determine using the time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval (TITE-BOIN) model, and it is defined as the dose for which the isotonic estimate of the DLT rate is closest to the target DLT rate.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Incidence of adverse events graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Time frame: From the start of study treatment until documentation of local or regional recurrence, progression, time to next therapy, and death, assessed up to 2 years
Anti-cancer activity will be measured by response rate by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Each endpoint will be analyzed using the cumulative incidence method when competing events exist or the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier when competing events are absent. Additionally, competing risk regression or proportional hazards modeling, whichever is appropriate, will be used to examine each endpoint while adjusting for disease. Estimates and 95% intervals will be reported.
Time frame: From the start of study treatment until documentation of local or regional recurrence, progression, time to next therapy, and death, assessed up to 2 years
Will be analyzed using the cumulative incidence method when competing events exist or the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier when competing events are absent. Additionally, competing risk regression or proportional hazards modeling, whichever is appropriate, will be used to examine each endpoint while adjusting for disease. Local control will be summarized as freedom from local failure calculated as 1 minus the cumulative incidence of local or regional recurrence. Estimates and 95% intervals will be reported.
Time frame: From the start of study treatment until documentation of local or regional recurrence, progression, time to next therapy, and death, assessed up to 2 years
Will be analyzed using the cumulative incidence method when competing events exist or the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier when competing events are absent. Additionally, competing risk regression or proportional hazards modeling, whichever is appropriate, will be used to examine each endpoint while adjusting for disease. Estimates and 95% intervals will be reported.
Time frame: From the start of study treatment until documentation of local or regional recurrence, progression, time to next therapy, and death, assessed up to 2 years
Will be analyzed using the cumulative incidence method when competing events exist or the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier when competing events are absent. Additionally, competing risk regression or proportional hazards modeling, whichever is appropriate, will be used to examine each endpoint while adjusting for disease. Estimates and 95% intervals will be reported.
Time frame: From the start of study treatment until documentation of local or regional recurrence, progression, time to next therapy, and death, assessed up to 2 years
Will be analyzed using the cumulative incidence method when competing events exist or the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier when competing events are absent. Additionally, competing risk regression or proportional hazards modeling, whichever is appropriate, will be used to examine each endpoint while adjusting for disease. Estimates and 95% intervals will be reported.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Ninety-five percent confidence intervals will be generated for all summary statistics. No formal statistical testing will be completed. Summary statistics and box plots will be created to examine Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) component scores at each assessment time as well as to examine the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) bowel questionnaire measured at week 5. Models will be created to examine impact of dosage upon quality of life (QoL) and acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. In the case of QoL, the models will examine QoL over time using linear mixed models, and we will test for an interaction effect between dose and time to examine whether any potential effects of dose upon QoL change over time. No testing will be completed; 95% confidence intervals will be created for all model coefficients.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Gamma-H2AX and RAD51 foci formation levels in peripheral mononuclear cells and CTCs will be tested for association with PAR inhibition using Pearson and Spearman correlation methods. An association between germline and tumor BRCA mutation status and PAR inhibition, H2AX. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals will be generated for all summary statistics. No formal statistical testing will be completed.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Will examine the component scores at each assessment time. as well as to examine the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) bowel questionnaire measured at week 5. . No testing will be completed; 95% confidence intervals will be created for all model coefficients.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Will examine the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) bowel questionnaire measured at week 5. No testing will be completed; 95% confidence intervals will be created for all model coefficients.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Models will be created to examine impact of dosage upon quality of life (QoL). In the case of QoL, the models will examine QoL over time using linear mixed models, and we will test for an interaction effect between dose and time to examine whether any potential effects of dose upon QoL change over time. No testing will be completed; 95% confidence intervals will be created for all model coefficients.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Other
Phase I Study of Talazoparib in Combination With Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Gynecologic Cancers
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04501913
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05564377
Adnexal Diseases, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05786456
Adnexal Diseases, Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04269837
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details