Alazhar university
Asyut, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05631353
Carriere Motion appliance (CMA) was designed to correct a Class II molar relationship into a Class I relationship by distalizing the whole posterior maxillary segment by means of class II elastics and mandibular anchorage. To revoke the adverse effects of CMA with class II elastics, we can use the CMA to distalize the maxillary posterior segment with TADs anchorage using miniscrews. The aim of this study is to evaluate TADs anchored CMA vs. conventionally anchored CMA for distalization of the maxillary buccal segment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me11 year–16 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Asyut, Egypt
Twenty class II malocclusion patients with age (11-16) years will be randomly allocated in the two groups:
Group I: Patients will be treated by Carriere Motion Appliance using passive lingual arch.
Group II: Patients will be treated by Carriere Motion Appliance using direct mini-screw.
For each patient, two CBCT will be obtained: one preoperatively and another after completion of distalization.
Comparing skeletal and dental measurements obtained from CBCT radiographs obtained prior to treatment (T0) and immediately after correction of class II and remval of the appliance (T1).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patient will be randomly allocated into two groups:
Group I: conventional mandibular anchorage using passive lingual arch. Group II: anchorage by direct mini-screws. In the group I, Class II elastics will be attached from the maxillary canine to the mandibular first molar bilaterally with passive lingual arch in the lower arch as anchorage means.
In the group I, Class II elastics will be attached from the maxillary canine to mandiular miniscrews bilaterally.
For each patient, two CBCT radiographs will be obtained: one preoperatively and another after completion of distalization.
Other names: Passive lingual arch., Mini-screw.
Time frame: from date of appliance delivery to date of removal after reaching class I molar relationship (about 4-6 months)
months
Time frame: from date of appliance delivery to date of removal after reaching class I molar relationship (about 4-6 months) ]
degrees
Time frame: from date of appliance delivery to date of removal after reaching class I molar relationship (about 4-6 months)
degrees
Al-Azhar University
Other
Carriere Motion Appliance in The Treatment of Class II Malocclusion Using Different Methods of Anchorage Control (Cone Beam Study)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07454694
Class II Malocclusion, Malocclusion
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07390357
Class II Malocclusion, Malocclusion
Wschowa, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05227859
Class II Malocclusion, Malocclusion
Damascus, Syria
View Trial DetailsNCT06832475
Class II Malocclusion, IMPA Angle
Rome, Italy
View Trial Details