Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07663110

Tackling Resistance And HealthCare Economics Through CPE Screening

The goal of this clinical study is to learn if it is possible to reduce the spread of resistant bacteria called CPEs (Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales) between patients admitted to hospital.

CPEs can be carried in the gut of people without making them ill. Normally when patients come into hospital, they may undergo a swab test on their bottom to see if CPEs can be grown. This test can take up to 24 hours to produce a result.

The investigators want to use a faster test which takes 2 hours to produce a result, and whether this can make a difference to CPE spread between person to person.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Why do people carry, transmit or get infected with CPE? 2. If a faster test was used to look for CPE, would this be better at reducing patient spread in hospital? 3. Is a faster test also more cost effective?

Participants will:

1. Be tested by both the usual and faster test when they come into hospital by a swab on their bottom 2. Where they test positive for CPE they will be asked to answer some questions about their health

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are a significant threat to healthcare through their ability to cause drug-resistant infections. These group of bacteria posses enzymes which break down and inactivate carbapenems, a broad spectrum class of antibiotics reserved for severe infections. Transmission of CPEs between patients occur through proximity / contact within their environment in hospital - and is therefore preventable.

Within the individual, initial colonisation with CPE is an important risk factor for development of multi-drug resistant infections which are associated with significant mortality and high hospital costs. The in-hospital transmission of CPE exerts a complex burden across almost all healthcare domains - for example, CPE infection or colonisation renders common surgical antibiotic prophylaxis ineffective, increases morbidity and mortality in vulnerable patient groups such as intensive care, places burdens on the use of single occupancy beds and imposes considerable cost and disruption to care pathways through outbreaks.

Existing microbiological diagnoses of CPEs vary, but commonly involve bacterial culture of a sample such as a rectal swab in laboratory settings followed by phenotypic testing and characterisation of common antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) through molecular or immunochromatographic approaches, mostly focusing on the "big 5" mechanisms of CPE. Such testing pathways can however be time-consuming, with the median result turnaround time to be between 24-48 hours. Rapid molecular testing for CPE bypasses the bacterial culture step and may allow for robust IPC measures to be implemented in a near real-time fashion including rapid risk stratification of CPE carriage status. Where transmission is suspected, contact tracing using rapid testing early in the transmission cascade could reduce unwanted impact and be cost-effective.

The proposed study examines the utility, cost-benefit in adoption of a rapid based screening approach using rapid CPE testing coupled with an enhanced reporting workflow operating 24 hours a day, compared with existing standard practice. Given the complex interactions of AMR and CPE acquisition and transmission within hospital settings, a comprehensive approach including clinical, epidemiological and health economic costings will be utilised and modelled in order to accurately understand impact. Rapid CPE screening will be incorporated into clinical processes to minimise adverse impact and the research conducted as a pragmatic study.

The rapid test for use in this study is the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R which can detect genes in 5 most prevalent Carbapenemase gene families (including KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP and OXA classes) directly from a rectal swab sample in 50 minutes - this technology is CE-mark approved as an in vitro diagnostic and has undergone NICE technological appraisal

Research hypotheses to be addressed through the study:

  • The implementation of rapid molecular CPE detection through the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R with an enhanced reporting workflow is associated with greater effectiveness and timeliness in IPC interventions, compared with the existing use of culture-based screening strategies alone. This will lead to reductions in in-hospital transmission of CPE and result in downstream effects for organisation and individuals.
  • In-hospital screening strategies through rapid molecular CPE testing can be cost-effective from a health economic perspective and acceptable to patient and stakeholders, given particular clinical settings and baseline local CPE prevalence.

This is a multi-centre mixed methods research study consisting of:

  • A pragmatic prospective interventional interrupted time series study to examine impact of rapid Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) diagnostics and an enhanced reporting workflow in parallel with screening on clinical practice and transmission.
  • A clinical observational cohort study to characterise individual risk factors for CPE colonisation, epidemiology of colonisation including point-prevalence, and subsequent in-hospital transmission dynamics.
  • A health economic modelling study utilising hospital and national data to estimate medical costs, patient experience and systems level impact of screening, CPE colonisation and acquisition

The study will take place across two hospital Trusts:

i) Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (ICNHT), London ii) Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London

Project 1 will implement the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R rapid test in parallel to routine culture for CPE screening at two hospital sites to understand impact on IPC practice.

Project 2 will capture transmission dynamics, healthcare cost, patient acceptability and quality of life metrics using national datasets, and de-identified healthcare data collected from Project 1. Modelling using health economics outcome research methods will be performed to evaluate CPE screening strategies for a range of scenarios and settings with a view of informing policy. Health economic costings will utilise routinely available clinical data as well as costings metrics and health related grouping code from NHS Hospital Episode Statistics.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All adult (18 years or older) medical patients admitted to the acute medical unit during the implementation period who undergo routine rectal CPE testing as per local Trust policy and test positive for CPE colonisation through either the rapid test or culture-based methods.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient refusal for rectal screening or
  • Clinical contraindication to rectal swab collection

Treatment and study plan

Rapid molecular diagnostic test for CPE identification

Diagnostic Test

Participants will undergo a rectal swab and undergo rapid molecular testing for CPE colonisation

Primary outcomes

  1. In-hospital secondary transmission of CPE colonisation

    Time frame: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months

    The primary outcome measure is the change in secondary in-hospital CPE transmission risk with the introduction of rapid rectal CPE screening. Quantification of transmission risk will be done using transmission dynamics modelling informed by collected clinical and epidemiological data.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health economic outcomes of CPE colonisation, infection and screening approaches

    Time frame: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months

    Direct, indirect and opportunity costs associated with CPE colonisation and infection using health economic cost analysis

  2. Laboratory measures of diagnostic comparison

    Time frame: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months

    Concordance metrics between CPE rapid testing and culture including rate, genotype and species.

  3. Epidemiological measures of CPE colonisation

    Time frame: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months

    Patient level risk factors for CPE acquisition, colonisation, and transmission.

  4. Qualitative measures including public, stakeholder understanding and acceptability

    Time frame: 24 months

    Perspectives on CPE diagnostic implementation, patient and provider acceptability of CPE screening through stakeholder interviews, public engagement and workshops.

  5. Qualitative study on CPE perspectives through stakeholder interviews, public engagement and focused workshops

    Time frame: 24 months

    This will be an adjunctive study with separate approvals process involving interviews with stakeholders to understand views and approaches to the management of CPE and detection. These findings will feed back into the main TRACE-CPE project.

  6. Point prevalence of CPE

    Time frame: Over the point prevalence period of 1 week

    Prevalence of CPE colonisation derived from the number of positive CPE cases divided by the number of individuals undergoing screening.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Research Governance and Integrity

CONTACT

[email protected]

020 7594 9832

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Imperial College London

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Multi-centre Evaluation of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) Prevalence and Transmission Dynamics, Recommendations on Screening Strategies, and Health Economics Outcomes Research Impact to Inform Policy Change

Acronym: TRACE-CPE

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jun 23, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 23, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.