Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
NCT Number: NCT01951885
This randomized clinical trial studies standard GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus and methotrexate compared to tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and a reduced-dose methotrexate in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Both mycophenolate mofetil and reduced-dose methotrexate, in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, have been shown to be safe and effective in GVHD prevention with less toxicity than standard dose methotrexate. It is not yet known, however, whether this combination of mycophenolate mofetil and reduced-dose methotrexate with tacrolimus is more effective than tacrolimus and standard dose methotrexate in preventing GVHD.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Study Design This is a prospective randomized trial to determine the effectiveness of different doses of GVHD prophylaxis on mucositis, engraftment and aGVHD. Study consists of two study groups of 50 subjects each.
Group A will receive Tac and MTX (15 mg/m2 day +1, 10 mg/m2 day +3, +6, +11). Group B will receive Tac, Mini-dose MTX (5 mg/m2 on day +1, +3, +6) and MMF.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
--- Busulfan dose may be adjusted according to pharmacokinetics targeting a daily AUC of 5000 μmol-min/L, per institution standard of practice.
Exclusion criteria
Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg/day beginning day -1 or tacrolimus 0.03mg/kg/dose BID orally beginning on day -3. If Tac is administered intravenously, it will be given over 24 hours and will be converted to oral administration 2 times a day when the patient has engrafted and/or can tolerate oral medication. Levels of Tac will be obtained to maintain a recommended target serum level of 5-12 ng/mL
Other names: FK 506, Prograf
MTX 15mg/m2 IV on day +1, followed by 10mg/m2 on day +3, +6, +11. If patient < 10 kg then MTX will be given at 0.5 mg/kg IV on day +1. Then MTX will be given at 0.33 mg/kg on days +3, +6 and +11.
Other names: amethopterin, Folex, methylaminopterin, Mexate, MTX
Patients will receive Mycophenolate beginning on day +1. Patients >40 kg will receive Mycophenolate 1000 mg twice a day. Mycophenolate should be given orally twice a day. IV formulation may be used if the patient cannot tolerate oral route. Patients < 40 kg will receive MMF 45 mg/kg/day (15 mg/kg three times a day). MMF may be given orally or intravenously as per institutional protocol
Other names: Cellcept, MMF
MTX 5mg/m2 IV on day +1, +3, +6. If patient<10 kg MTX will be given at 0.17 mg/kg on day +1, +3, and +6.
Other names: amethopterin, Folex, methylaminopterin, Mexate, MTX
Time frame: Up to day 28
Participants (percentage of) will be graded three times per week through day 28 of the study. Incidence will be compared through Wilcoxon rank sum tests.
The WHO grading scale for mucositis is scaled depending on the severity of mucositis symptoms, with a lower stage associated with a better outcome and greater stages associated with worse outcomes. The staging is as follows:
Stage 0: None Stage 1 (mild): Oral soreness, erythema Stage 2 (moderate): Oral erythema, ulcers, solid diet tolerated Stage 3 (severe): Oral ulcers, liquid diet only Stage 4 (life-threatening): Oral alimentation impossible
Time frame: Up to 28 days
The number of days to reach a neutrophil count of greater than or equal to 500/ul for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days. The day of engraftment will be the first day of the three consecutive laboratory values.
Time frame: The date the participant engrafts, up to 28 days
The number of days to reach a platelet count of greater than or equal to 20,000/ul for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days, independent of platelet transfusions the prior 7 days. The day of engraftment will be the first day of the three consecutive laboratory values. For cases of delayed engraftment beyond 28 days, results will be recorded once the participant engrafts.
Time frame: Day 7- Day 100
Acute GVHD by grade will be estimated using cumulative incidence methods and compared using the Gray test.
A lower clinical grade and/or stage of GVHD corresponds to a better participant outcome and a higher grade corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows:
Grade 0: No stage 1-4 of any organ Grade 1: Stage 1-2 skin without liver, upper GI, or lower GI involvement. Grade 2: Stage 3 rash and/or stage 1 liver and/or stage 1 upper GI and/or stage 1 lower GI.
Grade 3: Stage 2-3 liver and/or stage 2-3 lower GI, with stage 0-3 skin and/or stage 0-1 upper GI.
Grade 4: Stage 4 skin, liver, or lower GI involvement, with stage 0-1 upper GI.
A greater stage of GVHD involves worsening end-organ involvement and worse participant outcomes based on the skin, liver, lower GI, and upper GI.
Time frame: Date of transplant to date of discharge, assessed up to 1 year
Hospital stay will be compared between patients in groups A and B using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Time frame: Up to day 100
TPN use will be compared using the Chi-square test.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the 2 groups using the log-rank test.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the 2 groups using the log-rank test.
Time frame: at 6 months
Chronic GVHD will be graded as mild, moderate, or severe based on the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project. The type and duration of immunosuppressive treatment given for cGVHD will be recorded. Mild grades are associated with a better participant outcome and severe corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows:
Mild: 1 or 2 organs involved with no more than score 1 plus Lung score 0
Moderate: 3 or more organs involved with no more than score 1 OR At least 1 organ (not lung) with a score of 2 OR Lung score 1
Severe: At least 1 organ with a score of 3 OR Lung score of 2 or 3
Organ scores can range from 0 to 3, with 0 being no symptoms on the target organ and a better participant outcome while a score of 3 correlates to severe symptoms on the target organ and worse participant outcomes.
Potential target organs include: skin, mouth, eyes, GI tract, liver, lungs, joint /fascia, and genital tract
Time frame: at 12 months
Chronic GVHD will be graded as mild, moderate, or severe based on the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project. The type and duration of immunosuppressive treatment given for cGVHD will be recorded. Mild grades are associated with a better participant outcome and severe corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows:
Mild: 1 or 2 organs involved with no more than score 1 plus Lung score 0
Moderate: 3 or more organs involved with no more than score 1 OR At least 1 organ (not lung) with a score of 2 OR Lung score 1
Severe: At least 1 organ with a score of 3 OR Lung score of 2 or 3
Organ scores can range from 0 to 3, with 0 being no symptoms on the target organ and a better participant outcome while a score of 3 correlates to severe symptoms on the target organ and worse participant outcomes.
Potential target organs include: skin, mouth, eyes, GI tract, liver, lungs, joint /fascia, and genital tract
Time frame: up to +28 day
Start and stop dates for the need of continuous IV infusion of narcotics for severe mucositis pain will be recorded. Time on IV infusion will be compared between patients in groups A and B using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Time frame: Up to day +100
100-day incidence of infection will be compared using a the Gray test.
Time frame: Up to day +100
100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using a Gray test. Median and range of largest total bilirubin (mg/dL),
Time frame: Up to day +100
100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using a Gray test. Percentage of patients with elevated Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase and a 95% confidence interval
Time frame: Up to day +100
100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with VOD and 95% confidence interval
Time frame: Up to day +100
100-day incidence of nephrotoxicity will be compared using a Chi-squared test. Percentage of patients requiring dialysis and those with elevated creatinine using a 95% confidence interval
Time frame: Up to day +180
180-day incidence of pulmonary toxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with pulmonary hemorrhage and 95% confidence interval
Time frame: Up to day +180
180-day incidence of pulmonary toxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with pulmonary edema and 95% confidence interval
Time frame: Up to day +180
180-day incidence of pulmonary toxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with respiratory failure and 95% confidence interval
Time frame: Up to one year
Donor chimerism will be assessed by analysis of single-tandem repeats on whole marrow and in lymphocyte enriched or sorted CD3+ T cells and CD33+ granulocytes. Blood will be obtained for donor chimerism "Bone Marrow Engraftment analysis" at approximately 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months or as clinically indicated.
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Other
Tacrolimus, Mini-dose Methotrexate and Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Tacrolimus and Methotrexate for the Prevention of Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02639559
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00723099
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01634217
Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00807677
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details