Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05828693

Systemic Stress Prevention Via Application SysLife© for Companies

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of systemic stress prevention via SysLife© application in a prospective, interventive, balanced, monocentric, explanatory pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), with participants' subjective stress experience as the primary endpoint.

Research Question: Which implementations are necessary, based on the experience from this pilot RCT, to ensure the quality of a subsequent confirmatory RCT?

Hypothesis: We expect improvement of participants' subjective stress experience, goal achievement, systemic functioning in private and organisational social systems while using the SysLife© application.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Witten/Herdecke University

Witten, North Rhine-Westphalia, 58455, Germany

About this study

Background: Systemic prevention serves the prophylaxis of disease and/or illness, and/or damage to health. For social subsystems such as professional teams, there however still is a lack of effective preventive or health-promoting interventions. With the Prevention Act introduced in 2015 (Social Security Code, Germany: § 20 para. 1 SGB V), prevention now has to address the social context of people's everyday life as well ("setting/life-world approach"). Positive changes in terms of reduced stress perception or acute exposition to stress factors are supposed to be accompanied by improved systemic, psychological and physical well-being. This RCT will investigate the efficacy of the systemic stress prevention program SysLife© application.

Methods: This prospective, interventive, balanced, monocentric, explanatory pilot RCT compares an experimental group (n = 19) receiving SysLife© application with a control group (n = 19) with subsequent intervention, i.e. the SysLife@ application 4 months after the experimental group. The primary endpoint is the participants' subjective stress experience.

The data collection encompasses 5 measurement points: t1, i.e. baseline for the experimental group; t2: 2-month follow-up; t3: 4-month follow-up for the experimental group and baseline for the control group; t4: 6-month follow-up for the experimental group and 2-month follow-up for the control group; t5: 8-month follow-up for the experimental group and 2-month follow-up for the control group).

This allows for the calculation of trends considering the potential efficacy of the SysLife© application in the RCT design on the one hand (n = 19, 2-study arm approach), and in a cumulative study (n = 38, 1-study arm approach).

Research Question: Which implementations are necessary, based on the experience from this pilot RCT, to ensure the quality of a subsequent confirmatory RCT?

Hypothesis: We expect improvement of participants' subjective stress experience, goal achievement, systemic functioning in private and organisational social systems while using the SysLife© application.

Questionnaires: Stress and Coping Inventory (SCI); Trier Stress Inventory (TICS); Experience in Social Systems (EXIS), Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). Further items: demographic data, use of additional health care interventions, user behavior and effect of the SysLife© application.

Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first prospective, interventive, balanced, monocentric, explanatory pilot RCT comparing SysLife© application with a waiting group. For study purposes, it is a challenge to implement SysLife© application in organizational contexts such as teams: systemic prevention is an innovative health-promoting approach which is not (yet) covered by the German health insurance companies; the SysLife© application is an innovative program in digital health management with high flexibility how to approach it while being standardized in its structure; though companies are increasingly interested in health-promoting interventions for their employees, they are sparing considering the investment of time and financial resources in occupational health care.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Minimum age: 18 years
  • Interest in active use of the SysLife© application
  • Knowledge of German at native language level or the ability to use German language independently (at least B-level)
  • Only persons capable of giving consent will be included in the study
  • Written consent to participate after information about the study

Exclusion criteria

  • No written consent

Treatment and study plan

SysLife©

Behavioral

Use of the SysLife© application, with 2-, 4-, 6- and 8-month follow-up.

SysLife©, as intervention after closing the RCT-design

Behavioral

Use of the SysLife© application after 4-month waiting period, with 2- and 4-month follow-up.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline stress and coping at 4 months

    Time frame: baseline, 4-month follow-up

    Stress and Coping Inventory (SCI; Satow, 2012): Self-report measure to assess psychological and physical stress symptoms; Likert scale: 1 = not modified (positive), 7 = very strongly modified (negative)

  2. Change from baseline chronic stress at 4 months

    Time frame: baseline, 4-month follow-up

    Trier Inventory on Chronic Stress (TICS; Schulz, Schlotz & Becker, 2004): Self-report measure to assess chronic stress; Likert scale: 0 = never (positive), 4 = very often (negative)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS; Grosse Holtforth & Grawe, 2002)

    Time frame: baseline, 2-month follow-up, 4-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 8-month follow-up

    Self-report measure to assess participants' previously set goals and their achievement; Visual analogue scale: 0% = not reached at all, 100% = fully achieved

  2. Experience in Social Systems (EXIS; Hunger et al., 2017)

    Time frame: baseline, 2-month follow-up, 4-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 8-month follow-up

    Self-report measure to assess systemic functioning in private and organizational social systems; Likert scale: 1 = not at all (negative), 6 = fully (positive)

  3. Stress and Coping Inventory (SCI; Satow, 2012)

    Time frame: baseline, 2-month follow-up, 4-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 8-month follow-up

    Self-report measure to assess psychological and physical stress symptoms; Likert scale: 1 = not modified (positive), 7 = very strongly modified (negative)

  4. Trier Inventory on Chronic Stress (TICS; Schulz, Schlotz & Becker, 2004)

    Time frame: baseline, 2-month follow-up, 4-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 8-month follow-up

    Self-report measure to assess chronic stress; Likert scale: 0 = never (positive), 4 = very often (negative)

  5. Frequency of application use

    Time frame: baseline, 2-month follow-up, 4-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 8-month follow-up

    Program registration of user frequency; 0-1/week = infrequent use; 2-3/week = moderate use; 4-5/week = frequent use; 6-7/week = very frequent use

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Witten/Herdecke

Other

Collaborators

  • Murtfeldt Kunststoffe GmbH & Co. KG
  • Sysba solutions GmbH

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy of Systemic Stress Prevention Via Application SysLife© for Companies: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Apr 25, 2023
Registry last updated
May 8, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.