The Outpatient Clinics, Faculty of Physical Therapy Suez Canal University
Ismailia, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07505368
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and pulsed electromagnetic field in reducing pain, improving function, and increasing ROM in knee osteoarthritis patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ismailia, Egypt
Knee osteoarthritis is a prevalent and debilitating condition that affects millions of people worldwide. It is particularly common in older adults and is a major cause of disability and reduced quality of life. The disease is characterized by the progressive degradation of articular cartilage, leading to pain, stiffness, and impaired function. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis has been reported to range between 22% to 39% globally, and in specific regions like India, it is approximately 28.7%.
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy has emerged as a promising non-invasive treatment for knee osteoarthritis. The advantages of extracorporeal shock wave therapy include its ability to alleviate pain and improve joint function. Studies have demonstrated that extracorporeal shock wave therapy can significantly reduce pain scores and enhance physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis, making it a viable treatment option. Additionally, extracorporeal shock wave therapy has been shown to positively affect cartilage regeneration and reduce inflammation markers like matrix metalloproteinase-3, which is involved in cartilage degradation.
However, the disadvantages of extracorporeal shock wave therapy include the potential for adverse effects on articular cartilage, particularly at higher intensities, which may result in the worsening of cartilage conditions in some cases. Furthermore, while extracorporeal shock wave therapy is generally well-tolerated, its efficacy may vary depending on the energy levels used, with moderate intensity showing the best outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Electrotherapy application
Electrotherapy application
Hot pack, stretching exercises and strengthening exercises
Time frame: Pretreatment measurement and posttreatment (4 weeks) measurement.
Measurement of physical function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.
Time frame: Pretreatment measurement and posttreatment (4 weeks) measurement.
Measurement of pain intensity using the visual analogue scale.
Time frame: Pretreatment measurement and posttreatment (4 weeks) measurement.
Measurement of range of motion using the digital goniometer.
Suez Canal University
Other
SHOCK WAVE THERAPY VERSUS ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THERAPY IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03353233
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04958213
Arthritis, Dextrose Prolotherapy Injection
Hatay, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07618403
Arthritis, Gonarthrosis; Primary
Ankara, Yenimahalle, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07640529
Arthritis, Excercise
Riyadh, Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia
View Trial Details