University of Florida Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Francesco Franchi, MD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06691191
Ticagrelor currently represents the most tested and commonly used P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following percutaneous coronary intervention. The purpose of this study is to conduct a head-to-head comparison on the pharmacodynamic efficacy of ticagrelor-based and prasugrel-based single antiplatelet therapy. To determine if the PD profiles of ticagrelor- and prasugrel-based SAPT are comparable, we aim to conduct a non-inferiority study between the two strategies.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Francesco Franchi, MD
CONTACT
A strategy of P2Y12 monotherapy after 1-3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is associated with a substantial reduction in bleeding events without an increase in atherothrombotic events, including in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, different P2Y12 inhibitors vary in safety and efficacy profiles in the setting of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). In the TICO (Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3 Months in the Patients Treated With New Generation Sirolimus-eluting Stent for Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial, DAPT discontinuation at 3 months with transition to ticagrelor monotherapy was superior to standard 12-month DAPT for 1-year net adverse cardiac events in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Similarly, the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor with Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention) trial showed that in high-risk patients who have completed an initial 3-month course of DAPT following PCI, ticagrelor monotherapy reduced clinically meaningful bleeding events without increasing ischemic risk as compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin. In contrast, in STOPDAPT-2 ACS (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-2 Study for the Patients With ACS), discontinuation of DAPT at 1 to 2 months after ACS PCI with transition to clopidogrel monotherapy was not noninferior to 12-month DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel for 1-year net adverse cardiac events, due to a numerical increase in atherothrombotic events despite reduction in bleeding events. These data suggest that potent P2Y12 inhibitors should be preferred over clopidogrel in the setting of early SAPT after PCI in high-risk patients.
The ISAR-REACT (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment) 5 trial showed that in ACS patients the incidence of major cardiovascular events was lower among those who received prasugrel than among those who received ticagrelor, and the incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between the two groups. Based on these findings, European guidelines now suggest that prasugrel should be considered in preference to ticagrelor for ACS patients who proceed to PCI. Moreover, PD studies showed that, compared with ticagrelor, prasugrel provides similar or even superior platelet inhibition [16,17]. However, this clinical PD data is in the context of using prasugrel in the context of a DAPT regimen (i.e., in adjunct to aspirin) and data on the use of prasugrel-based SAPT following PCI are limited.
Overall, these observations as well as the lack of head-to-head comparisons on the clinical and PD efficacy of ticagrelor-based and prasugrel-based SAPT underscore the importance of conducting dedicated investigations to compare these approaches. To determine if the PD profiles of ticagrelor- and prasugrel-based SAPT are comparable, we aim to conduct a non-inferiority study between the two strategies. Such investigation may provide insights into the safety and efficacy of these strategies and set the foundation for larger-scale investigations assessing clinical outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
After providing written informed consent, patients on DAPT meeting study entry criteria will stop aspirin and be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion using a computer-based randomization system to either: a) ticagrelor 90 mg bid monotherapy or b) prasugrel 10 mg qd monotherapy. Patients will continue the randomized treatment for 21±7 days.
Other names: Brilinta
After providing written informed consent, patients on DAPT meeting study entry criteria will stop aspirin and be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion using a computer-based randomization system to either: a) ticagrelor 90 mg bid monotherapy or b) prasugrel 10 mg qd monotherapy. Patients will continue the randomized treatment for 21±7 days.
Other names: Effient
Time frame: 21±7 days
The primary endpoint of the study is the comparison of P2Y12 reaction unites (PRU) levels determined by VerifyNow between prasugrel monotherapy and ticagrelor monotherapy
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Andrea Burton
CONTACT
Francesco Franchi, MD
CONTACT
University of Florida
Other
Switching From Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Monotherapy With Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors: Pharmadodynamic Comparison Between Prasugrel and Ticagrelor Monotherapy. The Switching Antiplatelet -7 (SWAP-7) Study
Acronym: SWAP-7
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05681702
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06541691
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran
View Trial DetailsNCT06542393
Anemia, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT04436978
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Aalst, Belgium
View Trial Details