DOR/ISL
Drug100 mg DOR/ 0.75 ISL FDC single tablet taken orally once daily
Other names: MK-8591A
NCT Number: NCT04223791
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a switch to Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) (MK-8591A) (a fixed dose combination of doravirine 100 mg and islatravir 0.75 mg) in participants living with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) virologically suppressed on a regimen of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF). The primary hypothesis is that a switch to DOR/ISL (MK-8591A) will be non-inferior to continued treatment with BIC/FTC/TAF as assessed by the proportion of participants with HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) ≥50 copies/mL at Week 48. Participants who benefit from their assigned intervention (as determined by investigator) will be able to continue treatment through a 24-week study extension.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
St Vincent's Hospital ( Site 3807), Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
100 mg DOR/ 0.75 ISL FDC single tablet taken orally once daily
Other names: MK-8591A
50 mg BIC, 200 mg FTC, and 25 mg TAF combined in a single tablet, taken orally once daily
Placebo to BIC/FTC/TAF in a single tablet taken orally, once daily
Placebo to FDC DOR/ISL in a single tablet taken orally, once daily
Other names: Placebo to MK-8591A
Time frame: Week 48
The Abbott RealTime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. Per protocol, the primary outcome measure, the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at Week 48, is presented using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot missing data approach. The percentage values were rounded to the nearest tenth digit.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The percentage of participants who experienced an AE up to week 48 is presented.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE up to week 48 is presented.
Time frame: Week 96
The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. Per protocol, the secondary outcome measure, percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at Week 96, is presented using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot missing data approach. The percentage values were rounded to the nearest tenth digit.
Time frame: Week 144
The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. Per protocol, the secondary outcome measure, percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at Week 144, is presented using the FDA snapshot missing data approach. The percentage values were rounded to the nearest tenth digit.
Time frame: Week 48
The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. Per protocol, the secondary outcome measure, the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48, is presented using the FDA snapshot missing data approach. The percentage values were rounded to the nearest tenth digit.
Time frame: Week 48
The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. Per protocol, the secondary outcome measure, the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 48, is presented using the FDA snapshot missing data approach.
Time frame: Week 96
The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. Per protocol, the secondary outcome measure, the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 96, is presented using the FDA snapshot missing data approach. The percentage values were rounded to the nearest tenth digit.
Time frame: Week 96
The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. Per protocol, the secondary outcome measure, the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 96, is presented using the FDA snapshot missing data approach.
Time frame: Week 144
The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. Per protocol, the secondary outcome measure, the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 144 is presented using the FDA snapshot missing data approach. The percentage values were rounded to the nearest tenth digit.
Time frame: Week 144
The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. Per protocol, the secondary outcome measure, percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 144, is presented using the FDA snapshot missing data approach.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 48
Plasma CD4+ T-cell count was measured in cells/mm^3 for baseline and 48 weeks by a central laboratory. Baseline measurement of CD4+ T-cell count is defined as the day 1 value for each participant. The mean change from baseline in CD4+ T-cell count at week 48 using the data as observed (DAO) approach is presented. A negative value indicates a mean decrease in CD4+ T-cell count from baseline and a positive value indicates a mean increase in CD4+ T-cell count from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 96
Plasma CD4+ T-cell count was measured in cells/mm^3 for baseline and 96 weeks by a central laboratory. Baseline measurement of CD4+ T-cell count is defined as the day 1 value for each participant. The mean change from baseline in CD4+ T-cell count at week 96 using the data as observed (DAO) approach is presented. A negative value indicates a mean decrease in CD4+ T-cell count from baseline and a positive value indicates a mean increase in CD4+ T-cell count from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 144
Plasma CD4+ T-cell count was measured in cells/mm^3 for baseline and 144 weeks by a central laboratory. Baseline measurement of CD4+ T-cell count is defined as the day 1 value for each participant. The mean change from baseline in CD4+ T-cell count at week 144 using the data as observed (DAO) approach is presented. A negative value indicates a mean decrease in CD4+ T-cell count from baseline and a positive value indicates a mean increase in CD4+ T-cell count from baseline.
Time frame: Week 48
Viral drug resistance is defined as participants with confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL having genotypic or phenotypic evidence of resistance to the study drug administered. The number of participants who demonstrate drug resistance is presented.
Time frame: Week 96
Viral drug resistance is defined as participants with confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL and/or genotypic or phenotypic analysis of data showing evidence of resistance to the study drug administered. The number of participants who demonstrate drug resistance at week 96 is presented.
Time frame: Week 144
Viral drug resistance is defined as participants with confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL and/or genotypic or phenotypic analysis of data showing evidence of resistance to the study drug administered. The number of participants who demonstrate drug resistance at week 144 is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 48
Body weight was measured and recorded at baseline and week 48. Participants removed their shoes and wore a single layer of clothing at each measurement. The mean change from baseline in body weight at week 48 is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 96
Body weight was measured and recorded at baseline and week 96. Participants removed their shoes and wore a single layer of clothing at each measurement. The mean change from baseline in body weight at week 96 is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 144
Body weight was measured and recorded at baseline and week 144. Participants removed their shoes and wore a single layer of clothing at each measurement. The mean change from baseline in body weight at week 144 is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 55 months
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one or more AEs is presented. Per protocol, pregnancy-related AEs collected for enrolled participants are reported separately and are presented in the AE module.
Time frame: Up to approximately 40 months
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE is presented. Per protocol, pregnancy-related AEs collected for enrolled participants are reported separately and are presented in the AE module.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study to Evaluate a Switch to Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) Once-Daily in Participants With HIV-1 Virologically Suppressed on Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06908252
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01621347
Behavior, Blood-Borne Infections
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT01322932
Behavior, Blood-Borne Infections
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT01621412
Behavior, Blood-Borne Infections
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
View Trial Details