Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT02592499

Swedish Evaluation of Left Ventricular Assist Device as Permanent Treatment in End-stage Heart Failure

The study is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded, national, multi-center study. The study will consist of the assignment of eligible patients to treatment with either a HeartMate III (HM III) left ventricular assist device system or to pharmacological treatment (optimal medical management, OMM) according to current guidelines. Eighty (80) patients will be enrolled in this study and randomized in a 1:1 fashion between the HM III and OMM, based on a modified power calculation.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Sahlgrenska Univesitetssjukhustet, Transplantationscentrum, Gothenburg, Sweden

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The primary objective is to compare survival between left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) destination therapy and optimal medical management in a Swedish end stage heart failure population ineligible for cardiac transplantation.

The secondary objective is to compare treatment groups with respect to organ function, functional capacity, quality of life and adverse events.

All patients enrolled in the study will be followed through 2 years. Patients who continue to be on going with the HM III or on OMM past 2 years will continue be followed for their outcomes and adverse events for up to 5 years. Patient recruitment was expected to occur over 24 months, but due to difficulties in recruiting patients will be longer (approximately 48 months)

The study will be conducted in Sweden at all 7 University Hospitals and implantations will be performed in 5 sites.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed informed consent
  • Adult (≥ 18 years)
  • Chronic heart failure ≥ 45 days or stable not supported by mechanical circulatory support since >7days on single inotrope.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 30%.
  • NYHA IIIB-IV, INTERMACS profile 2-6
  • At least 2 of 4 adverse prognostic criteria:
  • SHFM estimated 1-year survival ≤75%
  • NTproBNP ≥ 2000 ng/l
  • VO2 max < 14 ml/kg/min or <50% of predicted VO2max with attainment of anaerobic threshold (AT), or unable to perform.
  • Need for continuous or intermittent inotropic support or >2 hospitalizations during last 6 months.
  • Receiving medical management with optimal doses of betablockers, ACE-inhibitors or ARBs, and MRAs for at least 30 days if tolerated.
  • Receiving CRT if indicated for at least 45 days.
  • Receiving ICD if indicated and appropriate.
  • Ineligible for cardiac transplantation (e.g. high age and/or co-morbidities)
  • Considered suitable for the study by a multidisciplinary board

Exclusion criteria

  • Eligible for heart transplantation or is likely to become eligible after VAD treatment (bridge-to-candidacy)
  • Indication for revascularisation, valvular surgery or other cardiac intervention expected to improve cardiac function and prognosis (CABG, PCI TAVI, mitraclip etc.)
  • INTERMACS profile 1 "crash and burn"
  • On-going mechanical circulatory support.
  • Heart failure due to restrictive cardiomyopathy pericardial disease, active myocarditis or uncorrected thyroid disease.
  • Mechanical aortic valve that will not be converted to a bioprosthesis or patch
  • Moderate to severe aortic insufficiency without plans for correction
  • Technical obstacles, which pose an inordinately high surgical risk
  • Active, uncontrolled infection
  • Stroke within 90 days or carotid artery stenosis > 80 % 12. Significant vascular disease. 13. Severe COPD or severe restrictive lung disease. 14. Intrinsic hepatic disease as defined by liver enzyme values (AST or ALT or total bilirubin) > 5 times the upper limit of normal, or INR > 2.0, which is not due to anti-coagulant therapy.
  • Intolerance to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies or any other operative therapy the patient will require based upon the patient's health status.
  • Platelet count < 50,000. 17. Measured GFR <20 ml/min/1.73m2 unresponsive to inotrope treatment or chronic dialysis.
  • High risk for right ventricular failure according to echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamic measurements as judged by the investigator (>2 parameter constitute an exclusion criteria) using a combination of the:

a. Severe TI b. TAPSE < 0.72 cm c. RVEDD/LVEDD > 0.72 d. CVP > 16 mm Hg e. MPAP - RAP < 10 mmHg SPAP-DPAP/CVPm >1 ok, <0.5 very bad, in between borderline f. CVP/PCWP > 0.63 g. RVSWI < 300 mm Hg x ml/m2 h. Bilirubin > 34 micromol/L 19. Body Mass Index (BMI) > 42 kg/m2. 20. Psychiatric disease, cognitive dysfunction, alcohol or drug abuse, or psychosocial issues that are likely to impair study compliance 21. Female of childbearing age with a positive pregnancy test or not willing to use adequate contraceptive precautions during the study.

  • Condition, other than heart failure, that could limit survival to less than 2 years.

Treatment and study plan

HM III

Device

Other names: left ventrical assist device, LVAD

OMM, optimal medical management

Other

Patients randomized to OMM will be treated according to international guidelines. All patients should receive a beta blocker, an ACE-inhibitor or an Angiotension II receptor blocker, and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist if tolerated and at optimally titrated doses according to guidelines. Loop diuretics should also be used as needed to control fluid retention. Other drugs that may relieve symptoms and improve prognosis can be used (incl ivabradin, digoxin, hydralazine,isosorbiddinitrate, anticoagulant agents). Patients that have an indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and/or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) should receive such therapy. Surgical interventions that may be indicated for specific underlying or contributing causes of heart failure.

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival at two years of follow-up

    Time frame: 2 years,

    survival

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants free from disabling stroke during the 2-year follow-up period

    Time frame: 2 years

    Survival free from disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) >3)

  2. A composite endpoint of "survival free from disabling stroke", survival and non-planned hospitalizations

    Time frame: 2 years

    Survival free from a composite endpoint of disabling stroke, survival and non-planned hospitalizations

  3. Survival at year of follow-up

    Time frame: 1 year

    Survival at year

  4. Functional capacity (NYHA) during the 2-year follow-up period

    Time frame: 2 years

    functional capacity determined by NYHA classification

  5. Functional capacity (6 min walk-test) during the 2-year follow-up period

    Time frame: 2 years

    functional capacity determined by 6 min walk-test

  6. Functional capacity (peak VO2)

    Time frame: 2 years

    functional capacity determined by peak VO2

  7. Health-related quality of Life during the 2-year follow-up period

    Time frame: 2 years

    Health-related quality of Life asses with EQ-5D-5L, SF-36 and KCCQ

  8. Number of participants with heart-failure related events

    Time frame: 2 years

  9. Cost-effectiveness during the 2-year follow-up period

    Time frame: 2 years

    Cost effectiveness calculated with QUALY (Quality-adjusted Life-year) and LY (Life year)

  10. Renal function during the 2-year follow-up period

    Time frame: 2 years

    Glomerular filtration rate evaluated by 51 chrome-EDTA or Iohexol clearance

  11. Hospital admissions during the 2-year follow-up period

    Time frame: 2 years

    Number of hospital admissions

  12. Number of participants with serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Time frame: 2 years

  13. Functional capacity (peak VO2)

    Time frame: 1 year

    functional capacity determined by peak VO2

  14. Three-years survival

    Time frame: 3 years

    survival

  15. Four-years survival

    Time frame: 4 years

    survival

  16. Five-years survival

    Time frame: 5 years

    survival

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Vastra Gotaland Region

Other Gov

Collaborators

  • Karolinska University Hospital
  • Region Örebro County
  • Skane University Hospital
  • University Hospital, Linkoeping
  • University Hospital, Umeå
  • Uppsala University Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Swedish Evaluation of Left Ventricular Assist Device

Acronym: SweVAD

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Oct 30, 2015
Registry last updated
Jul 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.