Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06400498

Surprise Question in End of Life (SeQuEL) Care and the Effect of Prompting Palliative Care Consultation: End-Stage Liver Disease

This is a single center randomized platform trial determining whether prompting consideration of palliative care consultation through the electronic health record impacts the number of palliative consultations placed and hospital-free days among hospitalized adults with End-Stage Liver Disease.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States

About this study

Palliative care is specialized medical care focused on providing patients with relief from the symptoms, pain, and stress of serious illness, regardless of diagnosis, by anticipating, preventing, and treating suffering. The goal is to improve quality of life for both the patient and the patient's family. Palliative care is appropriate at any age and at any stage in a serious illness. It may be provided together with curative treatment, and includes intensive focus on symptom and pain management, psychosocial and spiritual support, and assistance in advance care planning.

There is potential benefit to introducing palliative care earlier in the course of illness for patients with chronic liver disease. For some patients with cirrhosis, palliative care has been shown to improve physical and emotional symptoms. In a recent observational study, it was found that for patients with End-Stage Liver Disease (ESLD) on the waiting list for liver transplant, an early palliative care intervention counteracted the progression of worsening symptoms and significantly improved pruritus, appetite, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and well-being. Moreover, the introduction of palliative care within the care course of patients with decompensated cirrhosis is endorsed by an AASLD (American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases) practice guidance document.

Despite the available evidence regarding the potential benefits of specialized palliative care across multiple serious illnesses, the incorporation of palliative care consultation into clinical practice in many settings is inconsistent and often too late in the clinical trajectory. In an effort to introduce palliative care sooner and more consistently into patients' care pathways, the study team will explore an interruptive provider nudge to prompt palliative care consideration in ESLD. This integrated approach will also help bridge the knowledge gap as to whether systematically prompting palliative care consultation can improve referral rates and outcomes for patients with ESLD.

The processes used to 1) identify hospitalized patients with ESLD, 2) query a provider about their status, and 3) prompt consideration of palliative care consultation are amenable to conduct through the electronic health record. Step 1 will employ phenotyping of clinical and admission characteristics readily extractable from the medical record. Step 2 will utilize the "Surprise Question" as a screening tool for identification of potentially unmet palliative care needs. In previous studies of serious illness, patients for whom consideration of palliative care consultation might be appropriate have used the "Surprise Question", which asks the treating clinician "would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?" Step 3 will harness the capability to prompt a provider to consider appropriately indicated, complementary, supportive care that may be otherwise underutilized while managing the patient's immediate health crisis.

Given the preliminary evidence that specialist palliative care may improve the quality and quantity of time spent alive and outside of the hospital for patients with serious illness and the incomplete implementation of specialty palliative care in current clinical practice, the study team will evaluate the effect of prompting consideration of palliative care consultation in the electronic health record on provider referral rates to the palliative care service and hospital-free days among hospitalized patients with ESLD.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is an adult (age ≥ 18 years).
  • Patient is admitted to the study hospital.
  • Patient meets phenotype criteria for End-Stage Liver Disease.
  • Patient's treating physician, physician associate, or nurse practitioner answers "No" to a prompt in the electronic health record asking, "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?"

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient is known to have received any VUMC palliative care consultation during the prior 3 months and/or the current admission.
  • Patient is known to be a prisoner.
  • Patient has received a liver transplant.

Treatment and study plan

Prompted Palliative Care Consult

Behavioral

When a patient is randomized to the Palliative Care Consultation Prompt Group, a clinical decision support tool in the electronic health record will inform the treating clinician of the patient's serious illness and the results of the Surprise Question and prompt the treating clinician to consider a palliative care consultation. If the treating clinician feels a palliative care consultation would be indicated for the patient, the clinical decision support tool will facilitate the placement of a palliative care consultation by the treating clinician. If the treating clinician feels that a palliative care consultation would not be indicated, then the clinical decision support will record a reason it is not indicated.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients with palliative care consults placed within 48 hours after enrollment

    Time frame: 48 hours post-enrollment

    Percentage of patients identified within the EHR identified with palliative care consults.

  2. Hospital-free days by day 90

    Time frame: 90 days post-enrollment

    The number of calendar days between enrollment and day 90 in which the patient is alive and outside of an acute-care hospital. Days spent at home, at a rehabilitation facility, at a nursing facility, and at an inpatient hospice facility will count as hospital-free.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Survival to day 90

    Time frame: 90 days post-enrollment

    The number of calendar days in which the patient is alive between enrollment and day 90.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Pragmatic Trial Investigating Surprise Question in End of Life (SeQuEL) Care and the Effect of Prompting Palliative Care Consultation on Provider Referral Rates and Subsequent Outcomes for Hospitalized Adults With Serious Illnesses: End-Stage Liver Disease

Acronym: SeQuEL

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
May 6, 2024
Registry last updated
Aug 19, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.