Sohag University
Sohag, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07688473
This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) undergoing surgical evacuation using either single or double burr-hole craniostomy.
The comparison focuses on key outcome measures including recurrence rate, postoperative complications, neurological improvement, length of hospital stay, and overall functional recovery, in order to determine the most effective and safe surgical technique.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Sohag, Egypt
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Single burr-hole technique: A single burr hole was made over the maximum thickness of the hematoma followed by dural opening, irrigation with warm saline, and placement of a drain.
Double burr-hole technique: Two burr holes were created (frontal and parietal), allowing more extensive irrigation and evacuation of the hematoma, followed by drain placement.
Time frame: 6 months
re-accumulation requiring re-operation
Time frame: 6 months
invasion and multiplication of pathogenic microorganisms in a host, causing a local or systemic immune response, which may or may not result in clinical disease.
Time frame: 6 months
sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain that can cause changes in behavior, movement, sensation, consciousness, or autonomic function
Time frame: 6 months
presence of air within the intracranial cavity
Time frame: 6 months
evaluate the level of consciousness in patients with acute brain injury by assessing three components: eye opening, verbal response, and motor response.score ranges from 3 to 15, with lower scores indicating more severe impairment of consciousness.
Time frame: 6 months
strength generated by voluntary contraction of a muscle or muscle group and is assessed during neurological examination to evaluate the integrity of the motor system. It is commonly graded using the Medical Research Council (MRC) Muscle Strength Scale.ranging from 0 (no contraction) to 5 (normal strength), with higher vlaues indicating better outcomes.
Sohag University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04750200
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07197840
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07731620
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07729098
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
View Trial Details