Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06816641

Surgical Evacuation Of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hematoma: Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of surgical evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

20 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Sohag University hospitals

Sohag, Egypt

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Magdy M Amin, Professor

CONTACT

+20 109 0801900

About this study

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), i.e., nontraumatic hemorrhage into the brain parenchyma with or without ventricles, is a severe type of stroke with high mortality rates. Systemic arterial hypertension and cerebral amyloid angiopathy represent the two main risk factors of primary ICH. (1) ICH is understood to injure surrounding brain tissue through the direct pressure effects of an acutely expanding mass lesion and through secondary physiological and cellular pathways triggered by the hematoma and its metabolized blood products. Direct pressure effects can include both local compression of immediately surrounding brain tissue and more widespread mechanical injury caused by increased intracranial pressure (ICP), hydrocephalus, or herniation. Early hematoma expansion, possibly driven by mechanical shearing of surrounding vessels by the initial hematoma, is common and a consistent predictor of worse ICH outcome. Secondary physiological and cellular injury mechanisms postulated to be triggered by ICH include cerebral edema, inflammation, and biochemical toxicity of blood products such as hemoglobin, iron, and thrombin. Several of the major medical therapies for ICH such as BP lowering and reversal of anticoagulation are aimed at limiting hematoma expansion. The search for effective medical treatments for protecting tissue from secondary post-ICH injury, like the search for effective neuroprotectants for ischemic stroke, has to date been unsuccessful. Surgical hematoma evacuation through craniotomy or minimally invasive approaches is aimed at both preventing further pressure-related injury and protecting against secondary physiological and cellular injury. (2) Hematoma evacuation may have therapeutic potential, based on the theoretical advantages of preventing or correcting the acute effects of hematoma and its blood products into the surrounding healthy brain parenchyma. However, because the most common sites of spontaneous ICH are the deep brain structures, such as the basal ganglia and the thalamus, a large layer of healthy brain tissue would be damaged. Additionally, neurosurgical procedures are not free of risks and adverse effects. Post-surgical complications (e.g., hemorrhages and infections) are common in this clinical scenario and carry high rates of morbidity and mortality. (3) Recent meta-analyses suggested the benefits of neurosurgical hematoma evacuation, especially when performed earlier and done using minimally invasive procedures. In MISTIE III (Minimally invasive surgery plus alteplase for intracranial hematoma evacuation), to confirm hemostasis and reduce the risk of rebleeding, the mean time from onset of ICH to surgery was 47 hours while the mean time from onset of ICH to treatment completion was 123 hours. Theoretically, the earlier the hematoma is removed, the better the outcome. Therefore, a higher rate of hematoma reduction within an earlier time course may be beneficial. (4) Although the role of open surgery to treat patients with spontaneous ICH remains controversial, the use of craniotomy for intracerebral hematoma drainage is the most common strategy applied in most centers and also the most studied approach so far. (5) Controversy remains over the efficacy of surgery for ICH, particularly in the early (<12 hours) and very early (<8 hours) time windows. Further data are needed before definitive conclusions can be reached. However, the sum of preclinical and clinical data strongly suggests that early evacuation may be a necessary component of any successful surgical approach. Furthermore, recent data have suggested improved safety of such procedures using modern minimally invasive approaches. Such approaches may minimize collateral injury, allow safe management of intraoperative bleeding, and prevent postoperative rebleeding, all of which may facilitate the potential value of early ICH evacuation. (6)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • • Patients with radiological findings of ICH.
  • Age group 20-70 years.

Exclusion criteria

  • • Traumatic ICH or ruptured aneurysm or AVM or brain tumor.
  • Postoperative cranial surgery ICH.
  • Secondary hydrocephalus.
  • Patients with other comorbidities e.g., Liver cell failure and renal cell failure.
  • Patients with bleeding disorders.
  • Patients who are regular on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.
  • Small sized ICH< 30 ml.
  • GCS less than 6 preoperatively.

Treatment and study plan

Surgical Evacuation of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Procedure

Surgical Evacuation of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Primary outcomes

  1. Morbidity after surgical evacuation of Intracerebral hematoma

    Time frame: 1 month

    Complications within first month

  2. Mortality after surgical evacuation of Intracerebral hematoma

    Time frame: 1 month

    Death of patient within first month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Morbidity after surgical evacuation of Intracerebral hematoma

    Time frame: 3 months

    Complications from end of 1st month to end of 3rd month

  2. Mortality after surgical evacuation of Intracerebral hematoma

    Time frame: 3 months

    Death of patient

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ahmed S Mohamed, Professor

CONTACT

0100 3911767

Mohamed A Ragheb, Demonstrator

CONTACT

[email protected]

01025921006

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sohag University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Feb 10, 2025
Registry last updated
Feb 11, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.