Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07569549

Surgery for Thumb Base Osteoarthritis: Joint Replacement vs. Trapeziectomy

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the surgical method with total joint arthroplasty, (TOUCH joint prosthesis), is as good as or better than the traditional surgical method, trapezectomy, to treat thumb base joint osteoarthritis.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does surgery with total joint arthroplasty provide better power grip and pinch grip strength compared to traditional surgery?

What is the long-term risk of complications for both methods?

Which method is more cost-effective for the healthcare system?

Researchers will compare total joint arthroplasty (TOUCH) to trapezectomy (a procedure where a bone in the thumb base is removed) to see which method provides the best results for the patient.

Participants will:

Be randomized to undergo either an operation with total joint arthroplasty or a trapezectomy.

Undergo an initial evaluation and a health economic cost analysis after one year.

Attend follow-up checkups at 2, 5, and 10 years post-surgery to evaluate long-term function and the durability of the prosthesis.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

40 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Handsurgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background and Rationale:

Basal joint arthritis of the thumb (trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis) is a common condition causing pain and reduced hand function. While trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction/capsuloplasty has long been a gold standard, total joint arthroplasty, such as the TOUCH prosthesis, has gained popularity. However, there is a lack of high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these methods regarding long-term functional outcomes, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to compare the clinical and health-economic outcomes of total joint arthroplasty with TOUCH prosthesis versus trapeziectomy with capsuloplasty.

Study Design and Randomization:

This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Following informed consent obtained by the attending surgeon, participants are randomized to either:

  • Total joint arthroplasty using the TOUCH prosthesis.
  • Trapeziectomy with capsuloplasty. Randomization is performed in close proximity to the day of surgery. Due to the nature of the interventions, participants are informed of the surgical method postoperatively.

Procedures and Follow-up

  • Surgical Intervention: Both procedures are performed according to standardized institutional protocols.
  • Postoperative Care (Trapeziectomy): The thumb is immobilized in a cast for 3 weeks, followed by a standardized rehabilitation program led by occupational and physical therapists.
  • Postoperative Care (total joint arthroplasty): A stable soft dressing is applied for 3 weeks, followed by the same rehabilitation protocol.
  • Follow-up Schedule: Participants are evaluated at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, and 10 years postoperatively.
  • Imaging: Radiographic evaluations are performed for the prosthesis group at 6 weeks, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, and 10 years to monitor for prosthesis loosening or "z-deformity" (MCP joint hyperextension) compared to the trapeziectomy group.

Data Management and Quality Assurance:

Data is collected and managed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) to ensure data integrity and validation. Physical informed consent forms are stored securely at the Department of Hand Surgery. Source data verification is performed by comparing registry data against electronic medical records and paper-based Case Report Forms (CRFs).

Sample Size and Power Calculation:

The primary outcome is Jamar grip strength at 12 months. Based on a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of 6.5 kg and a standard deviation (SD) of 8.5 kg (derived from existing literature and pilot data), a power calculation (90% power, alpha 0.05, two-sided t-test) determined a requirement of 37 patients per group. To account for a 10% dropout rate, the total cohort size is set at 84 patients (42 per arm).

Health Economic Analysis:

A comprehensive health economic evaluation will be conducted to compare the total costs of both methods. This analysis includes:

  • Direct Costs: Implant costs, anesthesia, surgical time, and healthcare utilization (number of visits).
  • Indirect Costs: Duration of sick leave and time to return to work.
  • Secondary Metrics: Analgesic consumption (paracetamol and opioids), patient-reported quality of life (EQ-5D), and "pain-free days" based on NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) assessments.

The objective is to determine if the higher initial cost of the TOUCH prosthesis is offset by faster recovery, reduced sick leave, and improved long-term productivity.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 40-80 years at inclusion
  • CMC-joint osteoarthritis grade 1-3 (Eaton-Littler classification)
  • Rest pain or pain reducing hand function with indication for surgery
  • Insufficient relief from non-operative treatment for ≥3 months (orthosis, OTC analgesics, cortisone injection)
  • Eligible for both prosthesis and trapezectomy per including surgeon
  • Non-smoker or complete smoking cessation ≥6 weeks prior to surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous surgery to thumb base or STT-joint
  • Ongoing chronic pain condition
  • Dementia or cognitive impairment
  • Trapezium height <7 mm on plain radiograph
  • Active smoker
  • Osteoarthritis grade 4 (Eaton-Littler)

Treatment and study plan

Implantation of trapeziometacarpal prosthesis

Device

Surgical implantation of the TOUCH trapeziometacarpal total joint prosthesis (Kerimedical). The prosthesis consists of an uncemented stainless steel stem inserted into the first metacarpal and a dual cup mobility system with a polyethylene ball articulating against a metal cup fixed in the trapezium. The stem is available in straight or 15-degree angled neck configurations. Postoperative management consists of a stable soft dressing for 3 weeks to allow early controlled mobilization, followed by a standardized hand therapy rehabilitation protocol.

Other names: TOUCH Dual-Mobility Prosthesis

Trapeziectomy with Capsuloplasty

Procedure

Surgical excision of the trapezium bone (trapeziectomy) followed by capsuloplasty using a distally based dorsal capsular flap, without tendon interposition. The capsular flap is sutured to stabilize the base of the first metacarpal. No implant or tendon graft is used. Postoperatively, a cast immobilizing the thumb in functional position is applied for 3 weeks, followed by a standardized hand therapy rehabilitation protocol.

Primary outcomes

  1. Hand grip strength

    Time frame: Measured at 12 months postoperatively

    Hand grip strength (JAMAR dynamometer) at 12 months post operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Key-pinch grip strength

    Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 12 months postoperatively

    Key-pinch strength measured by pinch-gauge in kilograms

  2. Pinch grip strength

    Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively

    3-finger pinch strength measured by pinch gauge in kilograms

  3. Postoperative Pain Intensity on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively

    Pain measured with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and load, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "worst imaginable pain"

  4. Range of movement

    Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively

    Range of movement of thumb measured by physiotherapist. Extension, flexion, volar abduction, radial abduction. In degrees.

  5. Metacarpophalangeal (MCP)-joint hyperextension

    Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively

    Radiographic MCP-joint hyperextension (Z-deformity)

  6. Complications

    Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively

    Complications, such as trigger thumb, de Quervain's, reoperation, and infection, reported within 12 months of surgery.

  7. Use of analgesics

    Time frame: Measured at 12 months postoperatively

    Total usage of analgesic during the post operative period.

  8. Duration of sick leave

    Time frame: Measured at 12 months postoperatively

    Total duration of sick leave.

  9. Patient-reported outcomes EQ-5D

    Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively

    Patient-reported outcome of the hand surgery using validated questionnaire EQ-5D

  10. Patient-reported outcomes PRWHE

    Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively

    Patient-reported outcome of the hand surgery using validated questionnaire PRWHE

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Elias Gardell, MD, attending hand surgeon

CONTACT

[email protected]

+46 (0) 186171544

Eva Nordin, Clinical research nurse

CONTACT

[email protected]

+46(0) 186119630

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Uppsala University

Other

Collaborators

  • Uppsala County Council, Sweden
  • Örebro County Council

Registry information

Official study title

BASTION - BASe of Thumb Osteoarthritis Management Non-inferiority Trial: Surgical Treatment of First Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Comparison Between Joint Replacement and Trapeziectomy

Acronym: BASTION

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2038
First posted
May 6, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 25, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.