Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07558304

Suprapapillary Metal Stent vs. Routine Transpapillary Drainage in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction (SMART-B Trial)

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction is a condition in which the bile ducts near the liver become blocked due to cancer. This blockage can lead to jaundice (yellowing of the skin and eyes), itching, infection, and impaired liver function. To relieve the obstruction, doctors commonly perform procedures to drain bile and restore its flow.

There are different techniques available for biliary drainage. One common method is percutaneous transpapillary internal-external drainage, in which a catheter is placed through the liver and across the natural opening of the bile duct into the intestine. Another approach is percutaneous suprapapillary drainage using a self-expanding metal stent, which allows bile to drain without crossing into the intestine and may reduce the risk of contamination and infection.

Currently, there is no clear consensus on which of these two techniques is safer or more effective for patients with malignant proximal biliary obstruction. Some studies suggest that avoiding manipulation of the intestinal opening of the bile duct may reduce complications such as infection, but high-quality comparative evidence is lacking.

The purpose of this study is to compare percutaneous suprapapillary drainage with a self-expanding metal stent versus routine percutaneous transpapillary internal-external drainage in patients with malignant proximal biliary obstruction. The study aims to compare the rate of drainage-related complications between the two techniques, as well as to evaluate treatment success, stent patency, and the need for reintervention. In addition, in patients with potentially resectable disease undergoing preoperative biliary drainage, the study will assess and compare surgical outcomes between the two approaches. The results of this study may help determine the safest and most effective drainage strategy for these patients and improve future clinical decision-making.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903, Brazil

Location contact

Cleber R. P. Kruel, Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+55(51)3359-8232 ext. 8232

Cleber R. P. Kruel, Professor

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Flavia H. Feier, Professor

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Francisco C. B. Lemanski, General Surgery Resident

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Gabriel L. da Silva, Attending Physician

CONTACT

[email protected]

+55(51)3359-8232 ext. 8232

Gabriel L. da Silva, Attending Physician

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Leandro A. Scaffaro, Attending Physician

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Marcio F. Chedid, Attending Physician

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Mauricio Farenzena, Attending Physician

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Pablo D. Rodrigues, Attending Physician

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Tomaz J. M. Grezzana, Attending Physician

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

William F. Silvano, Attending Physician

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction is most commonly associated with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and represents a complex clinical condition characterized by impaired bile flow at or above the hepatic duct confluence. The resulting cholestasis may lead to progressive hepatic dysfunction, increased risk of infectious complications, and reduced tolerance to systemic or surgical therapies. In selected patients, preoperative biliary drainage is performed to optimize liver function and reduce perioperative risk prior to major hepatectomy.

Percutaneous biliary drainage is widely used in this setting due to its ability to selectively decompress specific hepatic segments, particularly in complex hilar strictures. The conventional approach consists of transpapillary internal-external drainage, in which a catheter is advanced across the obstruction and through the papilla into the duodenum. While effective in achieving biliary decompression, this technique may disrupt the function of the sphincter of Oddi and facilitate duodenobiliary reflux, which has been implicated as a potential mechanism for infectious complications.

Percutaneous suprapapillary drainage with placement of a self-expanding metal stent represents an alternative strategy. By avoiding transpapillary manipulation, this approach preserves sphincter function and may reduce bacterial contamination of the biliary tree. Early clinical data suggest a favorable safety profile, particularly regarding infectious outcomes; however, direct comparisons with conventional transpapillary drainage remain limited, and available studies are constrained by methodological limitations.

An additional area of uncertainty relates to patients with potentially resectable disease. In this subgroup, the choice of drainage technique may influence not only peri-procedural outcomes but also subsequent surgical management. Concerns have been raised regarding the potential impact of metallic stents on operative complexity and resectability, although robust data are lacking.

This randomized clinical trial is designed to compare two percutaneous drainage strategies within a standardized institutional framework. Patients with an indication for percutaneous biliary drainage will be allocated to receive either transpapillary internal-external drainage or suprapapillary drainage with a self-expanding metal stent. The study includes both patients with unresectable disease and those with potentially resectable malignancies, allowing for evaluation across different clinical scenarios.

All procedures will be performed by experienced interventional radiologists using uniform technical protocols, and patients will be managed according to institutional standards of care. Follow-up will include clinical, laboratory, and imaging assessment as appropriate to routine practice.

The study is designed to generate comparative evidence regarding the safety and performance of these two techniques. In addition, a prespecified subgroup analysis will focus on patients with potentially resectable cholangiocarcinoma undergoing preoperative biliary drainage, in order to explore the impact of drainage strategy on subsequent surgical outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >18 years.
  • Malignant proximal biliary obstruction on imaging (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography) with histopathological confirmation or high clinical and radiological suspicion.
  • Total bilirubin > 3 mg/dL.
  • Patients not candidates for potentially curative surgical resection due to locally advanced disease, metastatic disease, or inadequate clinical condition.
  • Patients with potentially resectable neoplasms, defined as the possibility of achieving complete resection (R0), who meet at least one of the following criteria:

5.1 Estimated future liver remnant <40%, in whom percutaneous portal vein embolization of the side to be resected will also be indicated after initial drainage.

5.2 Prolonged jaundice with total bilirubin >10 mg/dL for more than 14 days. 5.3 Malnutrition, defined as ≥10% unintentional weight loss or albumin <3 g/dL, presumably attributable to cholestasis.

5.4 Indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Exclusion criteria

  • Tumor with distal extension to the duodenal papilla, precluding suprapapillary drainage.
  • Prior biliary drainage procedure, either percutaneous (PTBD) or endoscopic (ERCP).
  • Acute cholangitis, clinically defined as fever (axillary temperature >38°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count >10,000/mm³).
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy.
  • Iodinated contrast allergy not amenable to desensitization.

Treatment and study plan

Percutaneous transpapillary internal-external biliary drainage

Procedure

Percutaneous biliary drainage performed by advancing a catheter across the biliary obstruction and through the papilla into the duodenum, allowing internal and external bile drainage.

Other names: Intervention 1

Percutaneous suprapapillary biliary drainage with self-expanding metal stent

Procedure

Percutaneous biliary drainage performed by placing a self-expanding metal stent across the biliary obstruction without crossing the papilla.

Other names: Intervention 2

Primary outcomes

  1. Acute cholangitis

    Time frame: Within 90 days after intervention

    Defined by clinical criteria, including fever (axillary temperature >38°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count >10,000/mm³), in the absence of another infectious source on abdominal and chest imaging.

  2. Acute cholecystitis

    Time frame: Within 90 days after intervention

    Defined by radiological evidence of cholecystitis associated with fever (axillary temperature >38°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count >10,000/mm³).

  3. Acute pancreatitis

    Time frame: Within 90 days after intervention

    Defined by the presence of at least two of the following criteria: abdominal pain consistent with pancreatitis, elevation of amylase and/or lipase greater than three times the upper limit of normal, or characteristic imaging findings.

  4. Bile leak

    Time frame: Within 90 days after intervention

    Defined as intra-abdominal bile leakage due to biliary perforation or at the hepatic puncture site, confirmed by imaging.

  5. Hemorrhage

    Time frame: Within 90 days after intervention

    Defined as clinical or radiological evidence of bleeding requiring blood transfusion or reintervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Therapeutic success

    Time frame: Within 30 days after intervention

    Defined as a decrease in total bilirubin to <3 mg/dL or a reduction of more than 50% compared to pre-drainage levels

  2. Mortality

    Time frame: Within 90 days after intervention

    All-cause mortality following biliary drainage.

  3. Need for reintervention

    Time frame: Within 30 days after intervention

    Requirement for additional percutaneous or endoscopic procedures

Other outcomes

  1. Rate of curative surgery

    Time frame: Within 180 days of intervention

    Number of patients from group A (patients with potentially resectable neoplasms) who undergo potentially curative surgery

  2. 90-day postoperative mortality

    Time frame: Within 90 days of curative surgery

    Surgical mortality in patients from Group A (patients with potentially ressectable neoplasms) who undergo potentially curative surgery

  3. 90-day postoperative morbidity

    Time frame: Within 90 days of curative surgery

    Surgical morbidity in patients from Group A (patients with potentially ressectable neoplasms) who undergo potentially curative surgery according to Clavien-Dindo classification

  4. Incidence of postoperative liver failure

    Time frame: Within 90 days of curative surgery

    Incidence of postoperative liver failure in patients from Group A (patients with potentially ressectable neoplasms) who undergo potentially resectable surgery

  5. Stent patency duration

    Time frame: Within 180 days of intervention

    Duration of stent patency in patients from group B (patients not candidates for potentially curative resection)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Cleber R. P. Kruel, Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+55(51)3359-8232 ext. 8232

Gabriel L. da Silva, Attending Physician

CONTACT

[email protected]

+55(51)3359-8232 ext. 8232

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Clinical Trial of Suprapapillary Drainage With Metal Stent vs. Routine Internal-External Transpapillary Drainage in Patients With Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

Acronym: SMART-B

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Apr 30, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 16, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.