Placebo
OtherPlacebo vaginal inserts.
NCT Number: NCT03930745
A Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study screening approximately 600 adult females, aged 18-55, with a goal to enroll approximately 250 participants to achieve 200 evaluable participants at the test of cure (TOC) visit. The study is designed to determine the clinical efficacy of an investigational product (IP), TOL-463 Insert, in suppressing Recurrent Bacterial Vaginosis (RBV) when administered to women who have a history of RBV and have been successfully cleared of their current Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) infection administering 500 mg of oral metronidazole, twice a day for 7 days or another CDC-recommended BV treatment. Patient participation will be approximately 100 days while the study is conducted at 4 sites within the United States. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a twice-weekly application of TOL-463 vaginal insert in suppression of BV in women with a history of RBV following successful induction with oral metronidazole or a CDC-recommended BV treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 2
University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine - Infectious Disease, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
This is a Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study screening approximately 600 adult females, aged 18-55, with a goal to enroll approximately 250 participants to achieve 200 evaluable participants at the test of cure (TOC) visit. The study is designed to determine the clinical efficacy of an investigational product (IP), TOL-463 Insert, in suppressing Recurrent Bacterial Vaginosis (RBV) when administered to women who have a history of RBV and have been successfully cleared of their current Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) infection administering 500 mg of oral metronidazole, twice a day for 7 days or another CDC-recommended BV treatment. Patient participation will be approximately 100 days while the study is conducted at 4 sites within the United States. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a twice-weekly application of TOL-463 vaginal insert in suppression of BV in women with a history of RBV following successful induction with oral metronidazole or a CDC-recommended BV treatment. Secondary objectives of the study are: 1) to evaluate the time to BV recurrence as defined by clinical criteria, 2) to evaluate the incidence of vaginal symptoms over study participation, 3) to evaluate acceptability of a twice-weekly application of TOL-463 vaginal insert in suppression of BV, and 4) to evaluate the safety of TOL-463 vaginal insert compared to placebo, including the incidence of secondary vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). The null hypothesis for the comparison is that there is no difference in cure rates between treatments, with a two-sided alternative.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Screening Visit(s) Inclusion Criteria:
*Consistent with current Pap screening guidelines, a Pap smear must be performed at V0, for women who meet the following criteria and cannot provide documentation or self-report of a normal or ASCUS HPV negative Pap smear, conducted within the prior 3 years: (a) has not had a hysterectomy or (b) has had a hysterectomy and has a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 plus (CIN2plus) in the past 20 years.
Note: If a Pap smear is conducted at V0, the results are not required prior to enrollment.
*Defined as post-menopausal or status post bilateral tubal ligation, or status post bilateral oophorectomy or status post hysterectomy.
**Acceptable methods are defined as:
Enrollment Visit Inclusion Criteria:
In addition to confirming all relevant Screening Visit Inclusion Criteria, women must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for enrollment in the study.
*For example: douches, antifungal or antibacterial preparations, lubricants, contraceptive creams, gels, foams, sponges, spermicides.
Exclusion criteria
Screening Visit(s) Exclusion Criteria:
*Women may be rescreened for eligibility following successful treatment of confounding Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI).
**Results of Nucleic Acid amplification Test (NAAT) testing will be reviewed prior to enrollment.
Enrollment Visit Exclusion Criteria:
In addition to confirming all Screening Visit Exclusion Criteria, women who meet any of the following criteria will not be eligible for enrollment in the study.
*Note: women who are menstruating may be reevaluated for study enrollment within the enrollment window.
Placebo vaginal inserts.
TOL-463 is a non-azole vaginal anti-infective drug candidate designed as a dual-indication therapy for BV and VVC.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 91
Recurrent bacterial vaginosis (RBV) was defined as the presence of at least three out of the following four Amsel criteria: positive KOH whiff test, homogeneous discharge characteristic of BV, clue cells comprising at least 20% of vaginal squamous epithelial cells, and vaginal pH > 4.5. Participants who had post-baseline efficacy results but were lost to follow-up before study completion were considered "treatment failures" and counted toward the number of participants with recurrence of BV.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 91
Recurrent bacterial vaginosis (RBV) was defined as the presence of at least three out of the following four Amsel criteria: positive KOH whiff test, homogeneous discharge characteristic of BV, clue cells comprising at least 20% of vaginal squamous epithelial cells, and vaginal pH > 4.5. Participants who had post-baseline efficacy results but were lost to follow-up before study completion were censored in secondary time-to-event analyses. Participants with off-study diagnosis of BV were excluded from secondary time-to-event analyses.
The median time to BV recurrence was calculated as the first event time at which the Kaplan-Meier estimator drops to or below 0.5.
Time frame: Assessed at Visit 1 (Day 1), Visit 2 (Window: Days 29-35), Visit 3 (Window: Days 57-63) and Visit 4 (Window: Days 85-91).
The BV symptoms evaluated for efficacy at each clinic visit included abnormal vaginal discharge and vaginal odor. Both symptoms were assessed by a clinician as either consistent with BV, not consistent with BV, or absent. Only symptoms deemed consistent with BV were reported as BV symptoms.
Time frame: Assessed at Visit 1 (Day 1), Visit 2 (Window: Days 29-35), Visit 3 (Window: Days 57-63) and Visit 4 (Window: Days 85-91).
The BV symptoms evaluated for efficacy at each clinic visit included abnormal vaginal discharge and vaginal odor. Both symptoms were assessed by a clinician as either consistent with BV, not consistent with BV, or absent. Only symptoms deemed consistent with BV were reported as BV symptoms.
Time frame: Assessed at study completion (the visit at which the participant was diagnosed with BV, or Visit 4 for participants remaining BV suppressed). This may occur at Visit 2 (Window: Days 29-35), Visit 3 (Window: Days 57-63) or Visit 4 (Window: Days 85-91).
The satisfaction questionnaire contained five questions assessing participant satisfaction with the study treatment. For questions regarding ease of use, frequency of use, and overall satisfaction, participants could respond on a scale ranging from "Extremely dissatisfied" to "Extremely satisfied." Participants who responded with "Somewhat satisfied" through "Extremely satisfied" were considered "Satisfied" with those categories. For the question regarding convenience of use, participants could respond on a scale ranging from "Extremely inconvenient" to "Extremely convenient." Participants who responded with "Somewhat convenient" through "Extremely convenient" were considered "Satisfied" with study treatment convenience. For the question of whether the participant would use the study treatment again, participants who responded with "Yes" were considered "Satisfied" with the study treatment.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 91
Safety was monitored throughout the study, including via participant reporting. Study clinicians assessed whether or not reported adverse events (AEs) were related to study treatment.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 91
Assessment of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) was performed by pelvic examination at baseline and at each follow-up visit. If clinical diagnosis of VVC was determined at any visit, then a confirmatory Candida culture was performed.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Nih
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Of TOL-463 Insert for Suppression Of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) [SUBVert]
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06438575
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07418918
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Chaozhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06985433
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Odense C, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07247851
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt
View Trial Details