University of Haifa
Haifa, Israel
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Sigal Zilcha-Mano, PhD
CONTACT
Tohar Dolev-Amit, M.A.
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT04576182
This study will explore the mechanisms of change that are activated when individuals receive a treatment that targets their weakness and the mechanisms activated when the treatment capitalize on their strength. Patients will be assigned to one of two types of psychotherapies in treating people with a major depression disorder, expressive-supportive vs. emotion-focused treatment. Their ability to benefit from treatment based on their pre-treatment levels of insight and emotional processing will be examined. This is a four-month protocol, with a 2 year follow up period.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Haifa, Israel
Location status: Recruiting
Sigal Zilcha-Mano, PhD
CONTACT
Tohar Dolev-Amit, M.A.
CONTACT
One hundred and twenty-four patients suffering from major depressive disorder will be randomized to participate in 16 sessions of either supportive-expressive therapy or emotion-focused therapy. The two treatments are theorized to differ in their main mechanism of change: supportive-expressive therapy places emphasis on insight as its main mechanism of change, and emotion-focused therapy places emphasis on emotional processing as its main mechanism of change. Both can serve as strength- or weakness-focused treatments, based on the patient's baseline levels of insight and emotional processing. Importantly, this study will employ multiple complementary methods, which will include session-by-session self-report questionnaires from both patient and therapist, as well as interdisciplinary measures based on hormonal and acoustic measures, cognitive tasks, clinician interviews, and behavioral coding systems to complement the self-report measures. In addition, prior the beginning of treatment patients will complete diaries via mobile survey application. The findings will contribute to the research on personalized mechanisms of change and can help clinicians focus on more efficient treatment delivery, adapted to given subpopulations of patients, according to their strengths and weaknesses. If a mechanism most likely to stimulate change for a subpopulation is identified, a corresponding treatment can be chosen that is most likely to activate that particular mechanism and by that improve the rate of patients' respondent to treatment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Sixteen weeks of a time-limited psychodynamic therapy adapted for depression that includes the use of expressive techniques, such as interpretation, confrontation, clarification and the use of supportive techniques, such as affirmation and empathic validation. This treatment postulates insight as its core mechanism of change.
Sixteen weeks of a brief experiential therapy for depression that combine client-centered relational elements (unconditional positive regard, congruence, and empathy) with marker-guided experiential interventions designed to facilitate and deepen emotional processing and emotion regulation.
Time frame: up to 16 weeks.
A 17-item clinically administered measure assessing the severity of depression. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: up to 16 weeks
A 21-item, self-rated scale that evaluates key symptoms of depression. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: up to 16 weeks
A 30 items self-report measure designed to assess patient therapy outcomes on three primary dimensions: (a) subjective discomfort, (b) interpersonal relationships, and (c) social role performance. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: At intake and 6 times during the treatment (weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16)
A 32-item self-report measure designed to assess interpersonal problems. Each item is rated in terms of how distressing the problem is for the individual on a scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: At intake and 6 times during the treatment (weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16)
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Scale. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Haifa
Other
Investigating Mechanisms of Change in Supportive-Expressive vs. Emotion-Focused Treatment of Depression Using a Personalized Treatment Approach: The Case of the Theories of Weakness vs. Strength
Acronym: SETEFT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03437928
Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07592689
Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06462196
Analgesics, Anesthetics
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00018057
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details