Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03464409

Supporting Patient Decisions About UE Surgery in Cervical SCI

The goal of this study is to collect and describe patient and caregiver reported outcomes regarding surgical and non-surgical treatment for improving hand and arm function in the setting of cervical spinal cord injury. Eligible study participants will be recruited across the 4 sites and the investigators plan to recruit the following groups and numbers of participants:

1. Nerve or tendon transfer recipients: people who have elected to undergo nerve (N=10) or tendon (N=10) transfer surgery to restore some hand and arm function as part of their standard clinical care and their caregiver (N=20) 2. Non-surgical control group: people with cervical SCI (N=20) and their caregiver (N=20)

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

At present, there is limited information that provides the exact time course and probability of gain in specific function (such as hand function) that might help patients and clinicians make decisions regarding novel and time-sensitive surgical treatment options.

Understanding the pros and cons of any surgical intervention, especially in the setting of complex and often incomplete information, is challenging. Ultimately, this project will create a decision support intervention (DSI) that can be used to help clinicians and people living with cervical level SCI and their caregivers. It will be most useful to those with acute or sub-acute injury (< 1year after SCI) for both military personnel and the general public. Clinicians and patients will have evidence to help them make decisions about treatments to improve upper extremity function.

In such a manner, patients can make more well-informed choices that are consistent with their values, needs and goals.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

CERVICAL SPINAL CORD INJURY PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult subjects (≥18 years and < 80 years) with cervical level SCI ASIA A, B or C (minimum 6 months and maximum 20 years post-injury).

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient who chooses simultaneous tendon and nerve transfer procedure (this would preclude separation of the influence of one surgery compared to the other)
  • Patient has ASIA D status (these patients may have progressive return of functionally useful motor function below the level of the SCI and would not routinely be offered acute surgical intervention and their experiences are less-relevant to the target patient population).

CAREGIVER PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Able to answer questions about the primary participant's experiences with cervical spinal cord injury

Exclusion criteria

  • The caregiver/spouse declines to participate in the study. Note: Caregiver participation is preferred, but not required, for SCI participant enrollment.

Treatment and study plan

semi-structured interview

Other

Semi-structured interviews to be conducted by a study team member.

Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-SR)

Other

The Spinal Cord Independence Measure - Self Report (SCIM-SR) is a self-report instrument for assessing functional independence of persons with spinal cord injury.

SF-36

Other

A health-related quality of life (QoL) self-reported survey.

Primary outcomes

  1. Qualitative (interview) Analysis

    Time frame: 24 months

    All interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using standard qualitative text analysis. Members of the research team will read the transcripts for accuracy and to determine potential topics for coding. The investigators will develop a codebook using inductive and deductive codes. Deductive codes will be directly linked to our research questions. Adding inductive codes, where topics and codes are not pre-determined but are derived directly from the data, will allow the research team to develop a sense of how patients experience the surgical process, and allows for unexpected findings to emerge. Once the codebook is determined, two members of the research team will code the transcripts. Codes will be compared between raters. The investigators will use the codes to infer themes in the data.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quantitative (survey) Data Analysis

    Time frame: 24 months

    The data analysis will be conducted within each group. To account for correlations among repeated measures from the same patient, the longitudinal data will be analyzed using a mixed model to examine the change in survey outcomes.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine

Other

Collaborators

  • Stanford University
  • United States Department of Defense
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System
  • VA St. Louis Health Care System

Registry information

Official study title

Supporting Patient Decisions About Upper Extremity Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (Aim 2)

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Mar 14, 2018
Registry last updated
Nov 3, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.