Opole University Hospital
Opole, 45-401, Poland
NCT Number: NCT06188039
The goal of this prospective study is to validate the superior vena cava collapsibility index (SVC-CI) as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during laparotomy and open aortic surgery. The SVC-CI and patients' response to fluid will be assessed based on transesophageal echocardiography.
The study has three arms, in order to validate SVC-CI under the conditions of laparotomy, aortic cross clamping and high PEEP levels. One of the study arms will be an active comparator arm.
The data obtained from this study may help physicians guide intraoperative fluid therapy in a more efficient manner, in order to decrease perioperative mortality.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Opole, 45-401, Poland
Patients undergoing high-risk non-cardiac surgery, including acute laparotomies and open aortic surgery, are at high risk of postoperative complications and adverse cardiovascular events. Perioperative fluid therapy is a factor which is strongly associated with postoperative outcomes. To avoid both hypovolemia and excessive fluid administration a strategy of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been coined. Traditionally in the setting of operating rooms GDFT relied on stroke-volume variation (SVV) measured by hemodynamic monitors, based on uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output analysis (uAPCO). However in the described cohort of patients uAPCO methods show a significantly increased measurement error, which is mainly attributed to dynamic changes in peripheral vascular tone. Furthermore, frequent occurrence of arhytmias in those patients limits the use of SVV and all other dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness based on those methods. Superior vena cava collapsibility index (SVC-CI) is a parameter which is devoid of the above mentioned limitations. It relies on respiratory variation of superior vena cava during the respiratory cycle and is therefore reliable in patients with irregular heart rhytm and seems independent from changing afterload conditions.
The main purpose of this study is to validate SVC-CI in patients undergoing controlled mechanical ventilation during laparotomies and during open aortic surgery, with focus on elevated PEEP levels and aortic cross-clamping.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
After induction of general anaesthesia following interventions will be performed.
Several volume trials per patient will be allowed, until safety criteria are met. In such cases further testing will be stopped.
Other names: SVC-CI, fluid bolus, transesophageal echocardiography
A transient elevation of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) will be applied, in order to validate SVC-CI in the setting of elevated PEEP.
A PEEP level of 8-10cmH2O will be applied for 1 minute prior to every measurement of SVC-CI. Then the previous PEEP level will be reinstated.
Time frame: Directly after infusing fluid bolus.
Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase of 10% or more of cardiac output (CO) following an administered 250ml fluid bolus. Changes in CO will be estimated using changes in left ventricle outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) assessed by transesophageal echocardiography to avoid errors associated with measuring LVOT area, which is necessary to calculate CO.
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Opolu
Other
Predicting Fluid REsponsiveness Using Superior Vena Cava Collapsibility IndEx duriNg High-risk Non-Cardiac surgEry (PRESCIENCE)
Acronym: PRESCIENCE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05320718
Anesthesia, Local, Regional Anesthesia
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05552092
Surgery
Gwangju, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT03369210
Anemia, Hematologic Diseases
Aachen, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT04846855
Anesthesia, Local, Hematologic Diseases
Quincy-sous-Sénart, IDF, France
View Trial Details