Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07093788

Super High-pressure Balloon Versus Intravascular Lithotripsy to Prepare Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions

this trial aimed to evaluate the stent expansion through intravascular imaging (optical coherence tomography (OCT) & intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)) among individuals underwent different preparation techniques ,then comparing the efficacy and safety of super high-pressure balloon to IVL in severely calcified lesions

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Lianyungang First People's Hospital, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Calcified lesions posed a significant challenge in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The existence of calcified plaque increased the difficulty of optimal stent expansion and the risk of target lesion failure(TLF). Consequently, optimizing the preparation techniques for calcified lesions before stent implantation has assumed growing importance.

As a kind of novel double-layered balloon, super high-pressure balloon can expand uniformly under extreme pressure. Previous studies have demonstrated that super high-pressure balloon perform non-inferiorly or superiorly to other strategies in terms of final stent expansion.

Through triggering localized pulsatile sonic pressure, intravascular lithotripsy(IVL) cracked intimal and medial calcium plaque within the artery. In present series of studies(DISRUPT), the optimized preparation of calcified lesions with IVL has been proved to be safe and effective. According to guidelines and clinical practice, IVL is applicable to different types of severe calcification lesions, including concentric and eccentric calcifications. However, considering its technological and economic costs, finding other preparation techniques non-inferiority to IVL was essential. In clinical practice, super high-pressure balloon had shown considerable effects of preparation for calcified lesions. However, study focused on the comparison of super high-pressure balloon with IVL for severe calcified lesions was limited.

In summary, this randomized trial aimed to evaluate the stent expansion through intravascular imaging among individuals underwent different preparation techniques ,then comparing the efficacy and safety of super high-pressure balloon to IVL in severely calcified lesions

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years and < 80 years
  • Presented as asymptomatic angina, stable angina, unstable angina, prior myocardial infarction (MI), or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
  • Have an indication for drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation
  • Denovo coronary artery calcified lesions
  • Target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 70%, or target lesion diameter stenosis between ≥ 50% and < 70%, accompanied by evidence of myocardial ischemia(such as fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤ 0.80 or minimal lumen area (MLA) ≤ 4.0 mm²).
  • Reference vessel diameter of the target vessel between 2.5 mm - 4.5 mm
  • Maximum calcium arc within the lesion ≥ 270⁰ assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)
  • Unsatisfactory lesion preparation with non-compliant balloon, defined as baseline diameter stenosis reduction of < 30% under maximal inflation pressure.
  • Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Presented as acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), cardiogenic shock and multiple organ failure
  • Presented as severe contrast agent allergy
  • Intolerant to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and/or anticoagulation therapy
  • Presented as active phase of autoimmune disease
  • Calcified nodules or eccentric calcification lesions
  • Failure to reach the target lesion with guidewires or catheters
  • Complex coronary bifurcation lesions
  • Target vessel thrombosis or aneurysm within 10 mm of the target lesion

Treatment and study plan

super high-pressure balloon

Device

preparation strategy for calcified lesions after unsatisfactory dilation

intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)

Device

preparation strategy for calcified lesions after unsatisfactory dilation

Primary outcomes

  1. stent expansion index

    Time frame: Intraprocedural

    The stent expansion was associated with post-PCI clinical outcomes and the risk of stent failure.In this study, the primary endpoint was stent expansion index, which was defined as the final minimal luminal area (MLA) within the treated segment divided by the average reference vessel area assessed with intravascular imaging (optical coherence tomography(OCT)&intravascular ultrasound(IVUS)).

Secondary outcomes

  1. 30-days major adverse cardiac event (MACE)

    Time frame: 30 days

    The secondary endpoint was defined as the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events within 30 days, which was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction [TVMI] and clinically driven target vessel revascularisation[TVR].

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Fei Ye, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

18951670287 ext. +86

Yi-fei Wang, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

18852577798 ext. +86

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Super High-pressure Balloon Versus Intravascular Lithotripsy to Prepare Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions: a Randomized Controlled Trial (Shape)

Acronym: Shape

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jul 30, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.