Anakinra
DrugStandard-of-care and anakinra. Anakinra is injected subcutaneously as 100 mg once daily for 10 days
Other names: Kineret
NCT Number: NCT04680949
The SAVE-MORE is a pivotal, confirmatory, phase III randomized clinical trial (RCT) aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early start of anakinra guided by suPAR in patients with LRTI by SARS-CoV-2 in improving the clinical state of COVID-19 over 28 days as measured by the ordinal scale of the 11-point World Health Organization (WHO) clinical progression scale (CPS).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
2nd Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupoli, Greece
Since March 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic started in Europe, the Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis has launched in Greece the SAVE clinical trial (suPAR-guided Anakinra treatment for Validation of the risk and Early management of severe respiratory failure by COVID-19) (EudraCT number 2020-001466-11; approval 38/20 of the National Ethics Committee of Greece, approval IS 028/20 of the National Organization for Medicine of Greece, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04357366). The concept of the SAVE trial was that early recognition of the risk for the progression of patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) by the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 into severe respiratory failure (SRF) may guide anakinra therapy to prevent SRF. The tool that was used for the diagnosis of risk for SRF is the biomarker suPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) at measurable concentrations in the blood ≥6 ng/ml. The trial was designed to be open-label non-randomized and the idea was το the start of treatment well before any sign of respiratory failure emerges. Patients hospitalized at tertiary hospitals during the same time period as the SAVE trial was ongoing and who were receiving the same standard-of-care (SOC) treatment were studied as comparators. An interim analysis was submitted to the National Organization for Medicines; number 108002/23.10/2020. In this interim analysis, 130 patients receiving anakinra treatment and SOC were analysed and they were compared to 130 patients receiving SOC. The 130 SOC parallel comparators were selected by propensity score matching to be fully matched to the anakinra-treated patients for age, comorbidities, severity scores on the day of hospital admission, i.e. APACHE II score, Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and WHO severity, and for the intake of azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine and dexamethasone. SRF was defined as any respiratory ratio (pO2/FiO2) less than 150 mmHg necessitating mechanical ventilation or non-invasive ventilation (NIV). The results of this analysis may be summarized as follows:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Standard-of-care and anakinra. Anakinra is injected subcutaneously as 100 mg once daily for 10 days
Other names: Kineret
Standard-of-care and placebo. Placebo is injected subcutaneously once daily for 10 days
Time frame: 28 days
Comparison of the distribution of frequencies of each score of the 5-scale patient state evaluated from the 11-point WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment by Day 28. This will be expressed as the distribution of the frequencies of each score of the scale in each arm of treatment by Day 28. The scale ranges from 0 (best outcome-asymptomatic) to 11 (worst outcome-death).
Time frame: 28 days
Comparison of the absolute change of the measure of the 11-point of WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment. The scale ranges from 0 (best outcome-asymptomatic) to 11 (worst outcome-death).
Time frame: 28 days
Comparison of the relative change (%) of the measure of the 11-point of WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment. The scale ranges from 0 (best outcome-asymptomatic) to 11 (worst outcome-death).
Time frame: 14 days
Comparison of the absolute change of the measure of the 11-point of WHO Clinical Progression nordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment. The scale ranges from 0 (best outcome-asymptomatic) to 11 (worst outcome-death).
Time frame: 14 days
Comparison of the relative (%) change of the measure of the 11-point of WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment. The scale ranges from 0 (best outcome-asymptomatic) to 11 (worst outcome-death).
Time frame: 14 days
Comparison of the absolute change of the SOFA score (in points) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 14 days
Comparison of the relative (%) change of the SOFA score (in points) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Comparison of the absolute change of the SOFA score between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Comparison of the relative (%) change of the SOFA score between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 90 days
Comparison of the time until hospital discharge between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 90 days
Comparison of the time until discharge from the intensive care unit between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 90 days
Comparison of the rate of serious and non-serious adverse events between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 60 days
Comparison of the rate of serious and non-serious adverse events between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Comparison of the relative changes of circulating concentrations of suPAR (μg/liter),D-dimers (μg/liter), ferritin (μg/liter), and Interleukin-6 (μg/liter) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Comparison of the relative changes of circulating concentrations of C-reactive protein (mg/liter) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 4 days
Comparison of the relative changes of circulating concentrations of suPAR (μg/liter),D-dimers (μg/liter), ferritin (μg/liter), and Interleukin-6 (μg/liter) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 4 days
Comparison of the relative changes of circulating concentrations of C-reactive protein (mg/liter) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Comparison of the absolute change of the viral load (in copies) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Comparison of the relative (%) change of the viral load between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 4 days
Comparison of the absolute change of the viral load (in copies) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 4 days
Comparison of the relative change (%) of the viral load between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Expression of messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) will be compared between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Protein composition will be compared between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 90 days
Comparison of the cost of hospitalization between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 60 days
Comparison of the distribution of frequencies of each score of the 5-scale patient state evaluated from the 11-point WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment by Day 28. This will be expressed as the distribution of the frequencies of each score of the scale in each arm of treatment by Day 60. The scale ranges from 0 (best outcome outpatients) to 5 (worst outcome-death)
Time frame: 90 days
Comparison of the distribution of frequencies of each score of the 5-scale patient state evaluated from the 11-point WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment by Day 28. This will be expressed as the distribution of the frequencies of each score of the scale in each arm of treatment by Day 90. The scale ranges from ) (best outcome-outpatients) to 5 (worst outcome-death)
Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis
Other
suPAR-Guided Anakinra Treatment for Validation of the Risk and Early Management of Severe Respiratory Failure by COVID-19: The SAVE-MORE Double-blind, Randomized, Phase III Confirmatory Trial
Acronym: SAVE-MORE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04747249
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Caen, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04924881
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Shatin, Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT04939506
Behavior, COVID-19
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04705116
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details