Treatment with IPL device
DeviceExposure of body parts to the IPL device
NCT Number: NCT03921814
This is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm, single blinded study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Sunstone IPL (Intense Pulsed Light) device to remove hair.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Sera Collection, Montebello, California, United States
Prospective, multi-center, single-arm, single blinded (Philips hair counter) study in healthy women of skin types I up to and including V.
Safety and efficacy of hair removal with the Investigational Philips IPL-device will be investigated.
In-clinic, each study subject will undergo twelve IPL-treatments at four areas bilaterally (face, axilla, bikini line, and legs) with an investigational IPL device applied by a device operator.
Hair re-growth in four body areas, face, axillae, bikini line and leg will be evaluated separately.
After the 4 bi-weekly treatments, one follow-up visit will be organized. After the completion of full treatment cycle (12 treatments), subjects will be followed for 1 and 3 months (short-term follow-up) and for 6, 9 and 12 months (long-term follow up).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
-
Exposure of body parts to the IPL device
Time frame: approximately 18 months
The analysis of the Primary safety endpoint will be based on the safety population which include all the enrolled subjects with at least one treatment. The primary safety endpoints include the treatment-emerged, anticipated adverse events (e.g. pain/discomfort, anticipated skin reactions.), non-anticipated adverse events, serious adverse events and reasons for discontinuation. Pain/discomfort will be evaluated per treatment per body area using the 5-point pain score grade. The percentage of the top-two scores will be calculated. Skin reactions will be assessed per treatment and body area, and will be described for type, onset, duration and severity. Incidence of adverse events will be summarized by frequency, severity and by relationship to device. Safety data will be summarized with descriptive statistics by body area, time points and clinical sites and combined.
Time frame: approximately 11 months
The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects with successful hair reduction at 1 month post-final treatment per body area. Successful hair reduction is defined as an average reduction in hair count at the given time point, that is greater than or equal to 30% relative to baseline hair count. Post-final treatment is defined as time point after the last of 12 treatments.
Time frame: approximately 14 months
The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects with successful hair reduction at 3 months post-final treatment per body area. Successful hair reduction is defined as an average reduction in hair count at the given time point, that is greater than or equal to 30% relative to baseline hair count. Post-final treatment is defined as time point after the last of 12 treatments.
Time frame: Approximately 2 months
Proportion of subjects with successful hair reduction (greater than or equal to 30% relative to baseline) at 8 weeks post-baseline (2 weeks after the 4th treatment) per body area.
Time frame: Approximately 4.5 months
Proportion of subjects with successful hair reduction (greater than or equal to 30% relative to baseline) at 10 weeks post-baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment) per body area.
Time frame: Approximately 22 months
Proportion of subjects with successful hair reduction (greater than or equal to 30% relative to baseline) at 6, 9 and 12 months post-final treatment (12 treatments) per body area.
Time frame: Approximately 22 months
Percent of top-two category answers of 5-point Likert satisfaction scale in assessment of subjective satisfaction with the treatment results in all body areas.
Time frame: Approximately 22 months
Percent of top-two category answers in assessment of acceptance of hair reduction, skin smoothness, and comfort after treatment with Philips investigational IPL devices in all body areas.
Time frame: Approximately 2 months
Evaluate the time course of hair reduction to baseline achieved by the Philips investigational IPL device for each body area during the first four treatments, i.e. during the Intensive Treatment phase.
Time frame: Approximately 18 months
Exploratory objective:
Assess the percentage of subjects who select a setting based on comfort, which is the same setting as indicated by the device.
Philips Healthcare
Industry
Clinical Investigation of Safety and Efficacy of a Philips Intense Pulsed Light Device for Hair Reduction (Sunstone 2019)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04807205
Benign Vascular Lesion, Hair Removal
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01057134
Hair Removal
View Trial DetailsNCT03945383
Hair Removal
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01529931
Hair Removal
Tustin, California, United States
View Trial Details