Tonic Stimulation
DeviceProdigy Neurostimulation System with associated components
NCT Number: NCT02011893
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Prodigy system for the treatment of chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me22 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Newport Beach Headache and Pain, Mission Viejo, California, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Prodigy Neurostimulation System with associated components
Prodigy Neurostimulation System with associated components
Time frame: Over 7 days after 3 months of treatment of burst or tonic stimulation
Differences for average daily overall pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain diary between Burst and Tonic Stimulation. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were averaged using a 7 day diary where the subject rates his/her pain on a horizontal line, from 0 mm to 100mm in length, anchored by word descriptors on each end (no pain to worst imaginable pain). A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
Time frame: Over 7 days at baseline and after 3 months of treatment of burst or tonic stimulation
Number of subjects responding to Burst and Tonic Stimulation defined as 30% or greater decrease in overall Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score from baseline. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were averaged using a 7 day diary where the subject rates his/her pain on a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by word descriptors on each end (no pain to worst imaginable pain). A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
Time frame: During in-office visit after 3 months of treatment while utilizing burst or tonic stimulation
Paresthesia mapping (percentage of paresthesia coverage) analyzed to demonstrate the differences between Burst and Tonic Stimulation. Data is presented as areas of paresthesia reported while utilizing either Burst or Tonic Stimulation as a percentage of the total number of areas possible.
Time frame: Over 7 days after 3 months of treatment of burst or tonic stimulation
Differences for average daily overall pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain diary between Burst and Tonic Stimulation to evaluate for superiority of Burst Stimulation. Differences for average daily overall pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain diary between Burst and Tonic Stimulation. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were averaged using a 7 day diary where the subject rates his/her pain on a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by word descriptors on each end (no pain to worst imaginable pain). A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
Abbott Medical Devices
Industry
Success Using Neuromodulation With BURST (SUNBURST™) Study
Acronym: SUNBURST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07145788
Agnosia, Chronic Pain
Stuttgart, Auerbachstraße 112, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT07426497
Chronic Pain, Coccydynia
Istanbul, Sisli, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06931158
Chronic Low-back Pain, Chronic Pain
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06842381
Chronic Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Almería, Almeria, Spain
View Trial Details