University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07267598
While an indoor upper temperature limit of 26 °C has been shown to protect heat-vulnerable older adults (DOI: 10.1289/EHP11651), this guideline has not been verified in young, habitually active adults. Public health recommendations during hot weather typically emphasize staying in cool environments, avoiding strenuous activity, wearing lightweight clothing, and maintaining adequate hydration. However, young adults may be less likely to follow these guidelines. They often do not reduce their physical activity during extreme heat events and may overdress for fashion, cultural, or religious reasons. These behaviors can impose an additional thermoregulatory burden and lead to greater physiological strain during heat exposure, even though young adults generally have a higher capacity for heat dissipation than older individuals. Accordingly, it is important to evaluate whether an indoor temperature limit of 26 °C is sufficient to protect young, habitually active adults.
To address this gap, the investigators aim to assess changes in body temperature and cardiovascular strain in young, habitually active adults (18-29 years) during an 8-hour exposure to the recommended indoor upper temperature limit of 26 °C and 45% relative humidity (humidex of 29, considered comfortable). Participants will complete two conditions:
A) seated rest while dressed in light clothing (T-shirt, shorts, and socks), and B) light exercise (stepping to simulate activities of daily living, 4-4.5 METs) performed once per hour (except for the lunch hour) while dressed in light clothing plus an additional insulating layer (sweatshirt and sweatpants).
This experimental design will allow investigators to determine the effects of added clothing insulation and light activity-representative of typical daily behaviors-on physiological strain in young adults, and to assess whether refinements to the recommended 26 °C indoor temperature limit are warranted for this population.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–29 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Young adults exposed to an 8-hour simulated exposure.
Time frame: End of 8 hour daylong exposure
Peak rectal temperature (15 min average) during exposure. Rectal temperature is measured continuously throughout the 8 hour exposure to the simulated indoor temperature upper limit.
Time frame: End of 8 hour daylong exposure
Areas under the curve (AUC) of rectal temperature during the 8 hour exposure to the simulate indoor temperature upper limit.
Time frame: End of 8 hour daylong exposure
Rectal temperature measured at hour 8 of exposure to indoor temperature limit (15-min average).
Time frame: End of 8 hour daylong exposure
Peak mean skin temperature (15 min average) during exposure. Mean skin temperature as calculated from skin temperature measured across 7 body regions is measured continuously throughout the 8 hour exposure to the simulated indoor temperature upper limit.
Time frame: End of 8 hour daylong exposure
Areas under the curve (AUC) of mean skin temperature as calculated over 7 body regions during the 8 hour exposure to the simulate indoor temperature upper limit.
Time frame: End of 8 hour daylong exposure
Mean skin temperature measured over 7 body regions at hour 8 of exposure to indoor temperature limit (15-min average).
Time frame: End of 8 hour daylong exposure
Peak heart rate (15 min average) during exposure. Heart rate is measured continuously throughout the 8 hour exposure to the simulated indoor temperature upper limit.
Time frame: End of 8 hour daylong exposure
Areas under the curve (AUC) of heart rate during the 8 hour exposure to the simulate indoor temperature upper limit.
Time frame: End of 8 hour daylong exposure
Heart rate measured at hour 8 of exposure to indoor temperature limit (15-min average).
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Root mean squared standard deviation of normal-to-normal R-wave to R-wave intervals (RMSSD) measured during 5 minutes of paced breathing (15 breaths/min) with participants in the supine position. RMSSD will be evaluated twice, during two paced breathing periods (separated by 4 min of supine rest).
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Standard deviation of normal-to-normal R-wave to R-wave intervals (SDNN) measured during 5 minutes of paced breathing (15 breaths/min) with participants in the supine position. SDNN will be evaluated twice, during two paced breathing periods (separated by 4 min of supine rest).
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Cardiac response to standing evaluated as the ratio between the highest R-wave to R-wave interval (lowest heart rate) measured at the 30th heart beat after standing from supine (+/- 5 beats) and the lowest R-wave to R-wave interval (highest heart rate) measured at the 15th heart beat after standing (+/- 5 beats). Cardiac response to standing will be evaluated twice, during two lying-to-standing tests (separated by 10 min of supine rest).
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Systolic blood pressure response to standing evaluated as the difference in blood pressure measured between the standing and supine. Standing systolic blood pressure will be taken as the lowest value of those measured after 60 and 120 seconds of standing. Systolic response to standing will be evaluated twice, during two lying-to-standing tests (separated by 10 min of supine rest).
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Systolic blood pressure measured in triplicate via automated oscillometry (~60 seconds between measures).
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Diastolic blood pressure measured in triplicate via automated oscillometry (~60 seconds between measures).
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Rate pressure product, an index of myocardial work and strain, calculated as systolic blood pressure x heart rate.
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Participants will be provided with a tablet device with the Sway Medical testing platform for the assessment of reaction time. Participants will be asked to initiate a movement of the device in response to a visual cue.
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Participants will be provided with a tablet device with the Sway Medical testing platform for the assessment of impulse control. Participants will be asked to respond to both "go" and "no-go" visual cues. In response to the "go" cue, participants will initiate a movement of the device.
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
To assess postural stability, participants hold a tablet to their chest, then auditory cues guide participants through four consecutive stances, feet side by side, instep of one foot touching the big toe of the other foot, tandem stand with one foot in front of the other, heel touching toe, and stand on one foot. The balance assessment will be evaluated based on movement detected by an accelerometer integrated into the hardware of the tablet device (Sway Medical Inc).
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
To assess postural stability, participants will be asked to stand on a BTracks force plate with their feet spread out to shoulder width while looking straight ahead. The assessment will comprise of one trial lasting 120 seconds in length. Center of pressure (COP) vector data along vertical (y) and horizontal (x) axes will be summed for the total path excursion length (cm) during each trial.
Time frame: End of 8 hour daylong exposure
Average hourly fluid consumption calculated by weighing participant water intake at the start and end of each hour of exposure (normalized to the exposure duration).
Time frame: End of 8 hour daylong exposure
Fluid loss calculated as the change in body mass during each exposure presented as a percentage of baseline body mass (corrected for food consumption).
Time frame: End of 8 hour daylong exposure
Change in plasma volume from baseline values calculated from duplicate measurements of hemoglobin and hematocrit at the start and end of each exposure using the technique by Dill and Costill.
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Thermal comfort assessed via a visual analog scale ("How comfortable does your body temperature feel?") ranging from "very uncomfortable" to "comfortable".
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Thirst sensation assessed via a visual analog scale ranging from "very, very thirsty" to "not thirsty at all".
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Felt arousal scale assessed via a visual analog scale ("How worked up are you?") ranging from "high arousal" to "low arousal".
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Thermal sensation assessed via a visual analog scale ("How hot do you feel?") ranging from "extremely hot" to "neutral"(midpoint: hot)
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Thermal sensation assessed via a visual analog scale ("How do you feel?") ranging from "hot" to "cold"(midpoint: neutral)
Time frame: At end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Cumulative sum of scores on 6 questions asking participant to rank symptoms associated with orthostatic intolerance during the lying to standing tests. All symptoms scored on a scale from 0 (none) to 10 (worst possible) and include feelings of: (1) "dizziness, lightheadedness, feeling faint, or feeling like you might black out"; (2) "Problems with vision (blurring, seeing spots, tunnel vision, etc.)"; (3) "Weakness"; (4) "Fatigue"; (5) "Trouble concentrating"; and (6) "Head and neck discomfort".
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Feel good assessed via a visual analog scale ("How good do you feel?") ranging from "very good" to "very bad"(midpoint: neutral).
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Perceived exertional assessed via a visual analog scale ("How hard are you working?") ranging from "no exertional at all" to "maximal exertion".
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Hydration status measured via assessing the urine specific gravity of a urine sample.
Time frame: End of 8 hour daylong exposure
Activity levels assessed via a wearable monitor (Actical) containing an accelerometer worn on the wrist and hip.
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Potential changes in mood (7 subscales of mood: tension, anger, depression, fatigue, confusion, vigor and esteem related affect). The POMS-40 is a validated, self-administered questionnaire that examines seven distinct aspects of mood state across two positive subscales (Esteem-Related Affect, and Vigor) and five negative subscales (Fatigue, Tension, Confusion, Anger, and Depression), which are described across 40 distinct adjectives. For each individual item, participants were asked to describe "how you feel right now" by responding using a 5-point Likert scale (0 = "Not at all", 1 = "A little", 2 = "Moderately", 3 = "Quite a lot", or 4 = "Extremely"). The values of items associated with a specific subscale (e.g., Fatigue) were summed to calculate its score.
Time frame: At the start (hour 0) and end of 8 hour daylong exposure
Self-reported environmental reactions and medical symptomatology associated with prolonged heat exposure. The ESQ-IV is a validated 68-item, self-administered questionnaire that has been used successfully in identifying symptomatology during exposure to a wide variety of environmental conditions, including heat exposure [24, 25].
Participants are asked to assess and described "how you have been feeling today" by responding to each item using a 6-point Likert scale (0 = "Not at all", 1 = "Slight", 2 = "Somewhat", 3 = "Moderate", 4 = "Quite a bit", or 5 = "Extreme"). Total Symptom Score was calculated from this data by taking the sum of the intensity ratings from all 68 individual items using reverse scores for the three positive items from the list ("I Felt Good", "I Felt Alert", and "I Felt Wide Awake").
Time frame: At the start of 8 hour daylong exposure.
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-report questionnaire that works by asking 19 questions about a person's sleep habits over the past month. It is scored by evaluating seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, and these are summed to create a global score from 0 to 21, where a higher score indicates poorer sleep quality.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Ottawa
Other
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a 26 °C Indoor Temperature Limit to Mitigate Physiological Strain in Young, Habitually Active Adults
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07383324
Behavior, Body Temperature Changes
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07261202
Behavior, Body Temperature Changes
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07664462
Altitude Sickness, Behavior
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07189507
Behavior, Body Temperature Changes
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details