Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02996344

Suicide Prevention Training for PC Providers-in-training

This randomized control study responds to the need for effective suicide prevention education/training that is grounded in adult learning theory and advances in education, in the context of a changing health care landscape where primary care providers are likely to encounter suicidal individuals. The study will test the effectiveness of suicide prevention education for providers-in-training by comparing two conditions: 1) A Control learning group: includes suicide prevention didactics (Commitment to Living: Primary Care) delivered online via brief videos, and 2) An Experimental learning group: includes didactics plus two standardized patient (SP) interactions. One Experimental learning group SP interaction will be in person and the other will be conducted remotely using a secure webcam service (OoVoo). All SP interactions will be recorded. Both groups will be compared in terms of their suicide prevention skills using an SP 'test case' at 6-month follow up. The primary research question is to learn about the impact of practice (though SP simulation) over and above didactics alone.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Rochester Medical Center

Rochester, New York, 14642, United States

About this study

Suicide is a national public health crisis and a critical patient safety issue. Suicide is the 10th leading cause of death overall and, shockingly, the 2nd leading cause of death in adolescents and young adults (15-34 years old). 1 A recent U.S. study of suicide reported that 45% of individuals who died by suicide had contact with primary care services within one month before their death. 2 Another study found that 80% of youth who died by suicide saw their primary care provider within the year of their death. 3 Patient safety is compromised when primary care providers lack the knowledge and skills to assess and respond to patients at risk for suicide.

This randomized control study responds to the need for effective suicide prevention education/training that is grounded in adult learning theory and advances in education, in the context of a changing health care landscape where primary care providers are likely to encounter suicidal individuals. 4 We will test the effectiveness of suicide prevention education for providers-in-training by comparing two conditions: 1) A Control learning group: includes suicide prevention didactics (Commitment to Living: Primary Care) delivered online via brief videos, and 2) An Experimental learning group: includes didactics plus two standardized patient (SP) interactions. One Experimental learning group SP interaction will be in person and the other will be conducted remotely using a secure webcam service (OoVoo). All SP interactions will be recorded. Both groups will be compared in terms of their suicide prevention skills using an SP 'test case' at 6-month follow up. The primary research question is to learn about the impact of practice (though SP simulation) over and above didactics alone. The hypotheses are as follows:

H1: All subjects will demonstrate improved suicide prevention knowledge from pre to post didactics and maintain improvement 6 months after didactics.

H2: Subjects in the experimental learning group will report greater satisfaction with the training, greater self-efficacy in identifying and responding to patients at risk for suicide, greater intention to use, as well as use of suicide prevention skills.

H3: Subjects in the experimental learning group will also be more skillful in responding to patients at risk for suicide (in an SP interview, measured by objective observed ratings) compared to the control learning group 6 months after didactics.

Exploratory Aims: We will examine moderators of outcomes, differences among SP simulations (i.e., face-to-face vs. telehealth modalities), and if there is growth in improved skills observed over multiple SP experiences in the experimental learning group.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • trainee in family medicine residency, pediatrics residency, or nurse practitioner program at URMC.
  • speaks/writes English.

Exclusion criteria

  • on academic probation

Treatment and study plan

Didactic training

Other

Six online training modules pertaining to suicide prevention in primary care.

Standardized patient interaction

Other

Two standardized patient practice interactions - 1 face-to-face, 1 remote/telehealth.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean score using the Commitment to Living: Primary Care Observational Rating form

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

    Each participant will be evaluated via standardized patient interactions which are video taped and reliably coded using the Commitment to Living: Primary Care Observational Rating form. Score will range from 0 - 32.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in suicide prevention knowledge

    Time frame: 1 day following enrollment and 15 days from enrollment

    Participants will complete a 17-item knowledge questionnaire prior to and following the online didactic training. Number of correct responses will be compared.

  2. Changes in suicide prevention self-efficacy

    Time frame: 1 day following enrollment and 15 days from enrollment

    Participants will complete a 20-item 5-point likert scale self-efficacy questionnaire prior to and following the online didactic training. Average responses will be compared.

  3. Changes in suicide prevention knowledge

    Time frame: 15 days from enrollment and through study completion, an average of 6 months

    Participants will complete a 17-item knowledge questionnaire following the online didactic training and end of study. Number of correct responses will be compared.

  4. Number of participants intending to transfer training to practice

    Time frame: 15 days from enrollment and through study completion, an average of 6 months

    Participants will complete a 8-item intentions to use training in practice on a 5-item likert scale questionnaire following the online didactic training and end of study. Number of participants who report positive intentions to use the training in practice will be compared.

  5. Changes in suicide prevention self-efficacy

    Time frame: 15 days from enrollment and through study completion, an average of 6 months

    Participants will complete a 20-item 5-point likert scale self-efficacy questionnaire following the online didactic training and end of study. Average responses will be compared.

  6. Use of suicide prevention skills

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

    Participants will self-report whether they used suicide prevention skills in practice on 0-4 point likert scale, with 0 defined as no use and 4 as frequently used.

  7. Feedback on training

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

    Participants will provide feedback on their experience with suicide prevention training on 15 items using a 5-point likert scale.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Rochester

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Suicide Prevention Training for Primary Care Providers-in-training

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Dec 19, 2016
Registry last updated
Feb 12, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.