Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
Munich, Bavaria, 81675, Germany
NCT Number: NCT00895609
This study is designed to compare recovery times after reversal of a residual neuromuscular block (TOF-ratio 0.5) with different doses of either neostigmine or sugammadex.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–64 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Munich, Bavaria, 81675, Germany
Muscle relaxants are integral part of modern anesthesia. They optimize intubating conditions, reduce laryngeal trauma and improve operating conditions. Drawback is a possible pharmacological (muscle relaxing) effect of these drugs beyond the end of the operation (i.e. post-operative residual curarization: PORC). Reportedly about 30% of all patients who received muscle relaxants show signs of PORC when arriving in the post-anesthesia care unit. PORC comprises the risk of impaired post-operative fine motor and coordinative skills with a possible impairment of swallowing pharyngeal secretions with an increased risk of aspiration after extubation. Possible deleterious effects of this could be pneumonia, bronchitis, myocardial infarction, cardiac insufficiency, stroke or re-operation.
In order to avoid PORC patients with residual neuromuscular block receive a muscle relaxant antagonist from the anesthetist at the end of the operation. However, these drugs (neostigmine, pyridostigmine, etc.) from the class of cholinesterase inhibitors have unwanted effects such as bradycardia, increased gastro-intestinal motility, post-operative nausea and vomiting, salivation etc. To decrease these unwanted side effects cholinesterase inhibitors have to be given in combination with parasympatholyics e.g. atropine or glycopyrrolate with their own spectrum of unwanted side effects.
From October 2008 on, Sugammadex, a completely new reversal drug was introduced in to clinical practice. Sugammadex, is a modified gamma-cyclodextrine able to specifically bind rocuronium (a steroidal muscle relaxant). The complex is eliminated via the kidneys. However, all studies so far have focussed on reversal of profound or deep neuromuscular blockade. This study is designed to compare recovery times after reversal of a residual neuromuscular block (TOF-ratio 0.5) with different doses of either the neostigmine or sugammadex.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Single intravenous injection of either:
Sugammadex 0.0625 mg/kg (Sgx 0.0625) Sugammadex 0.125 mg/kg (Sgx 0.125) Sugammadex 0.25 mg/kg (Sgx 0.25) Sugammadex 0.5 mg/kg (Sgx 0.5) Sugammadex 1.0 mg/kg (Sgx 1.0) Neostigmine 5 mg/kg (Neo 5) Neostigmine 8 mg/kg (Neo 8) Neostigmine 15 mg/kg (Neo 15) Neostigmine 25 mg/kg (Neo 25) Neostigmine 40 mg/kg (Neo 40) Saline 0.9% (Saline)
Time frame: Regular anesthesia time, approximately 1 hour
Technical University of Munich
Other
Dose Finding Study for Sugammadex and Neostigmine at Residual Neuromuscular Blockade (T4/T1 = 0.5)
Acronym: SUNDRO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02838134
Neuromuscular Block, Renal Transplant Donor of Left Kidney
Leiden, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT02484651
Neuromuscular Block
Porto, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT03734250
Avitaminosis, Deficiency Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT02320734
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
View Trial Details