Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, 21512, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT04237532
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of Dexmedetomidine drug either used sublingually or intranasally in managing healthy children during dental treatment
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me5 year–7 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Alexandria, 21512, Egypt
Each child should fulfill the requirements of having a dental condition which needs treatment in two dental sessions, where each session should not exceed thirty minutes. At the first visit ,either sublingual or intranasal Dexmedetomidine will be used, while at the second visit the alternate route will be implemented in a cross-over design. At least one week interval between the two visits will be secured.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The mucosal atomizing device will be used intranasally where the sedative drug will be equally divided and sprayed into each nostril while the child semi reclined position.
The mucosal atomizing device will be used sublingually by asking the child to touch their maxillary incisor teeth with the tip of their tongue and instruct the child not to swallow the drug for 30 seconds.
Time frame: during the sedation procedure
Assessed by a 4 point Likert scale as follows: 1 (Good) the child accepted the drug without any refusal. 2 (fair) the child accepted the drug with some verbal resistance. 3 (poor) the child accepted the drug with some physical resistance. 4 (refused) the child refused but drug administration was possible after persuation.
Time frame: during the sedation procedure
Time taken by both routes to reach the desired level of sedation using Wilton et al sedation scale and it is scored as follows: 1. Agitated: Clinging parent and/or crying. 2.Alert: Awake, but not clinging to parent may whimper but not crying. 3.Calm: Sitting or lying comfortably with eyes spontaneously open. 4.Drowsy: Sitting or lying comfortably with eyes spontaneously closing but responds to minor stimulation. 5. Asleep: Eyes closed, rousable, does not respond to minor stimulation.
Time frame: during the sedation procedure
Anxiety level during local anesthesia administration will be evaluated using Venham's clinical anxiety scale. 0: Relaxed child, 1: Uneasy, concerned, 2:Child appears scared, 3:Shows reluctance to enter situation, difficulty in correctly assessing situational threat, 4:Anxiety interferes with ability to assess situation.
Nourhan M.Aly
Other
Effectiveness of Sublingual Versus Intranasal Administration of Dexmedetomidine for Sedation of Children Undergoing Dental Treatment (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06752759
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic, Anesthetics Agent
Brooklyn, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04695509
Deep Sedation, Moderate Sedation
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT02708212
Endoscopy, Moderate Sedation
View Trial DetailsNCT01941888
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Moderate Sedation
Milan, Italy
View Trial Details