Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04352660

Subconjunctival Versus Direct Mitomycin C in Trabeculectomy

Trabeculectomy is routinely used as a surgical treatment for open angle glaucoma. Success of trabeculectomy is greatly augmented by the use of antimetabolites to inhibit wound healing, specifically Mitomycin C (MMC). MMC can be applied to the eye at various sites, concentrations and times. This study aims to compare the two application routes that are commonly employed: subconjunctival pre-operative injection and intraoperative direct scleral application in terms of IOP lowering effect, bleb appearance and complications.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

About this study

Trabeculectomy is widely used as a surgical treatment of uncontrolled open glaucoma. Success of trabeculectomy at halting or slowing glaucoma progression primarily relies on the extent of conjunctival and sclera wound healing. The success rates of trabeculectomy increased dramatically with the introduction of anti-metabolites. For more than two decades mitomycin-c (MMC), a chemotherapeutic agent capable of decreasing fibroblast activity and modulating wound healing at the bleb, has been used with trabeculectomy. The complications of MMC are well known and several studies have described various methods of application based on exposure time, dose and surface area. Numerous retrospective and prospective studies have compared the efficacy of MMC applied beneath the conjunctival flap with soaked sponges versus intrascleral application. In 2008, Lee et al. first described an alternative route of application: subconjunctival injection of MMC directly into the intra-Tenon area. Seventy-six eyes with primary and secondary open angle glaucoma underwent trabeculectomy with this approach and were followed for one year post-operatively. Eighty-six percent of eyes achieved an IOP <21 mm Hg and 57% an IOP<14 mm Hg at one year without adjunctive drops. Transient complications included hyphema, bleb leak and choroidal detachment. The advantages of injected MMC are primarily in controlling the exact dosage and area of application and reduced surgical time. Lim et al. retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of trabeculectomy in 57 eyes using sponge application directly to the sclera versus intra-tenon injection. IOP was significantly lower in the injection group at 1 month, 1, 2, and 3 years. Trabeculectomy success (IOP<21mm Hg or IOP >20% below baseline without medications or additional surgery) was greater in the injection group at 3 years. The sponge group experienced more encapsulated blebs but complication rates were similar in both groups. To date, there have been no prospective studies comparing the IOP-lowering efficacy and safety of intra-tenon injection versus direct scleral application of MMC.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • medically uncontrolled glaucoma
  • healthy and freely mobile conjunctiva in superior bulbar region

Exclusion criteria

  • previous incisional glaucoma surgery
  • no light perception vision
  • pregnant or nursing women
  • iris neovascularization or proliferative retinopathy
  • iridocorneal endothelial syndrome
  • chronic or recurrent uveitis
  • steroid-induced glaucoma
  • pathologic myopia or refractive error less than -6.00 diopters
  • unwillingness or inability to give consent
  • inability to return for scheduled protocol visits

Treatment and study plan

Mitomycin-C injection

Drug

MMC delivered by preoperative subconjunctival injection

Mitomycin-C sponge

Drug

MMC delivered by intraoperative direct scleral application with impregnated cellulose sponges

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Intraocular Pressure Reduction Thresholds

    Time frame: 6 months

    Percentage of patients achieving at least a 30% mean intraocular pressure reductions from baseline and with an intraocular pressure <21 mm Hg. Subjects that met this criteria without the use of intraocular pressure lowering medications were classified as "Complete Success." Subjects that met this criteria but required the use of intraocular pressure lowering medications were classified as "Qualified Success." Subjects that failed to meet this criteria were classified as "Failure." Subjects that failed to meet this criteria and required additional glaucoma surgery were classified as "Complete Failure."

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bleb Morphology

    Time frame: 6 months

    Bleb morphology at 6 months was graded using Indiana Bleb Appearance Grading Scale. Bleb height was graded on a scale of 0 to 3 (0: flat bleb without visible elevation, 1: low bleb elevation, 2: moderate bleb elevation, 3: high bleb elevation). Bleb extent was graded on a scale of 0 to 3 (0: no visible bleb extent to less than 1 clock hour, 1: extent equal to or greater than 1 clock hour but less than 2 clock hours, 2: extent equal to or greater than 2 clock hours but less than 4 clock hours, 3: extent equal to or greater than 4 clock hours). Bleb vascularity was graded on a scale of 0 to 4 (0: avascular/white, 1: avascular/cystic, 2: mild vascularity, 3: moderate vascularity, 4: extensive vascularity). Scales are descriptive and do not necessarily represent better or worse outcomes.

  2. Medications

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of intraocular pressure lowering medications used by the patient at follow up visit.

  3. Visual Acuity

    Time frame: 6 months

    Change in visual acuity from baseline

  4. Number of Participants With Surgical Complications

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of eyes that experienced surgical complications following surgery

  5. Number of Participants Requiring Additional Surgery

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of eyes requiring additional surgery from each group

  6. Postoperative Interventions

    Time frame: 6 months

    Mean number of postoperative interventions (needling, antifibrotic injections) performed in each group

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Diego

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Subconjunctival Versus Direct Scleral Application of Mitomycin-C in Trabeculectomy

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Apr 20, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 2, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.