Universitair Ziekenhuis UZBrussel
Jette, Brussels Capital, 1090, Belgium
NCT Number: NCT03883542
The aim of this study is to identify different origin in carcinogenesis between serous borderline ovarian tumors presenting a. without implants, b. with non-invasive implants, c. with invasive implants and d. with micropapillary pattern.
The presence of specific mutations could suggest for a more aggressive primary treatment if a higher risk of recurrence can be expected.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Observational
Jette, Brussels Capital, 1090, Belgium
Introduction Borderline Ovarian Tumors (BOTs) behave indolently in the vast majority of cases and the prognosis is usually favorable. There is more evidence that two subtypes of BOTs represent a higher risk of recurrence or even progression to an invasive ovarian cancer. In case of a presentation with a micro-papillary grow pattern or when invasive implants are diagnosed the prognosis tend to be less favorable.
Genome sequencing in ovarian cancer helped to differentiate two different pathways in the carcinogenesis.
Low grade serous carcinomas evolving from adenofibromas or borderline tumors over non-invasive micropapillary serous borderline tumors to invasive micropapillary serous carcinoma, show frequent mutations in the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma gene (KRAS), B-Raf Kinase gene(BRAF), Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 gene (ERBB2), Phosphatase and Tensin homolog gene (PTEN), Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha gene (PIK3CA) and Catenin Beta 1 gene (CTNNB1). This pathway is called Type I and is characterized by a slow step-wise process. These low-grade invasive tumors are indolent and are known with a better outcome than high-grade invasive tumors.
In contrast the Type II pathway development of invasive tumors is rapid and vast majority of tumors show a Tumor Protein p53 (TP53) mutation and loss of Breast Cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1).
The aim of this study is to identify different origin in carcinogenesis between serous borderline ovarian tumors presenting a. without implants, b. with non-invasive implants, c. with invasive implants and d. with micropapillary pattern.
The presence of specific mutations could suggest for a more aggressive primary treatment if a higher risk of recurrence can be expected.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the subgroups
Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the serous BOT tissue with invasive implants will undergo a more comprehensive examination (large panel +- 1000 genes checked)
Time frame: 2020
amount and type of genetic mutations in different subgroups will be analyzed and compared between the different subgroups. Are the mutations suggestive for a type I or type II pathway differentiation?
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Other
Sub-type Specific Genomic Mutations in Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumors
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05605535
Adnexal Diseases, Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
View Trial DetailsNCT06466382
Adnexal Diseases, Fallopian Tube Diseases
Baden, Canton of Aargau, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT04111978
Abdominal Neoplasms, Adnexal Diseases
Graz, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT06728670
Ovarian Neoplasm Epithelial
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial Details