SLF Dialysis Center, National University Hospital
Singapore, SGN, 298135
NCT Number: NCT02064153
Hemodialysis (HD) is widely used treatment for end stage renal diseases (ESRD) patients. The chief aims of HD are solute and fluid removal. Decades of practice have improved HD care, but more can be done to improve morbidity and mortality. Enhancing toxin removal is an important consideration for improved patient outcomes. Also, decreasing the incidence of intra-dialytic hypotensive (IDH) episodes (dominant in Singapore patient cohort) can significantly reduce associated morbidities and mortality. A simple maneuver for clinicians is the dialysate temperature. Literature suggests that a lower dialysate temperature (35ºC) results in reduced hypotensive episodes by vasoconstriction. Conversely, higher dialysate temperature resulting in higher blood temperature decreases the peripheral resistance, leading to increased toxin removal, but may cause IDH episodes partly due to vasodilation. Optimal manipulation of the dialysate temperature is therefore primary handles to obtain the improved patient outcomes. In this study, the effect of dialysate temperature (cool vs. warm dialysate) on toxin removal will be studied. In both the interventions, outcome measure will be patient hemodynamic response and amount of toxins removed. The spent dialysate will be collected to study the quantum of toxin removed.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Singapore, SGN, 298135
Cool dialysate, by vasoconstriction, is simple maneuver to control and/or prevent incidence of intra-dialytic hypotension (IDH). During dialysis fluid is continuously removed. IDH occurs when plasma refilling rate is smaller than the set ultra-filtration rate. When plasma refiling rate is small, continuous fluid removal bring patient to the threshold state where patient does not have sufficient fluid in central compartment. This leads to the cascade of events, viz., low blood pressure, muscle cramps, dizziness, being first few manifestation. To minimize the occurrence of such events, clinicians often prescribe cool dialysate resulting in vasoconstriction, which ensures sufficient fluid volume in central body compartment so that continuous fluid loss does not impact patient hemodynamics severely.
It is important to note that vasoconstriction may also inhibit the toxin movement from remote peripheral compartments to central blood compartment, and thus less toxin will be removed. On the other hand warm dialysate leading to vasodilation will mobilize the toxins in remote peripheral compartments and increase the toxin influx in central blood compartment. Few researchers have investigate the effect of dialysate temperature on urea removal, but urea is not a true marker of toxin milieu. In this pilot clinical research, we will compare the effect of dialysate temperature on removal of both small and large sized uremic toxins. Our objective is not to study the effect of dialysate temperature on incidence of IDH, so we will recruit subjects who are stable on dialysis and have no prior history of IDH episodes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Each recruited patient undergoes a cool dialysate session ( 35.5ºC) and a warm dialysate session (37ºC). The sessions are minimum a week apart to remove the carryover effect.
Other names: Cool dialysate at 35.5ºC, Warm dialysate at 37ºC
All recruited patients will undergo two study sessions - Cool dialysis (35.5ºC) and Warm dialysis (37ºC)
Other names: Warm dialysate at 37ºC
Time frame: 1 month
Collect the whole dialysate and measure the toxin concentration. This will provide the amount of toxin removed during study session. Compare the removed toxin mass for cool vs warm dialysate session.
Time frame: 1 month
Cool dialysate may lead to stability of patient, but may also result in chilling sensation during dialysis. On the other hand, warm dialysate may cause intra-dialytic hypotensive episode. In both sessions, patient physiological changes will be monitored.
National University Hospital, Singapore
Other
Potential of Manipulating the Dialysate Temperature for Prevention of Intra-dialytic Hypotensive Episodes in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04160351
Dialysis Amyloidosis, Hemodialysis-Associated Amyloidosis
Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia
View Trial DetailsNCT03211676
Chronic Disease, Dialysis Amyloidosis
Poitiers, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02952144
Dialysis Amyloidosis
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07627607
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypotension
Kütahya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details