Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07379138

Studying Quality of Life Inclusive of Mental Health and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Cancer Distress for the Improvement of Quality of Life in Stage III-IV Melanoma Patients

This clinical trial studies how people feel and live during the first two years after being treated for melanoma and whether cognitive behavioral therapy for cancer distress (CBT-C) works to improve quality of life in patients with stage III-IV melanoma. The melanoma survivorship population is rapidly growing, given the increasing survival rates due to treatment advancements. An urgent need to better define and optimize comprehensive quality of life inclusive of mental health (QOL-MH) has been identified. Cognitive behavioral therapy is a type of psychotherapy that helps patients change their behavior by changing the way they think and feel about certain things. CBT-C is a new type of care that helps patients cope with cancer-related stress, which can include problems like trouble sleeping, trouble focusing, or changes in social life and daily activities. Gathering information on how melanoma patients feel and live during the first two years after treatment may help promote improved care and continued scientific advancements in the understanding of melanoma specific QOL-MH and survivorship as a whole, and may also help determine whether CBT-C improves qualify of life in patients with stage III-IV melanoma.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Clinical Trials Referral Office

CONTACT

[email protected]

855-776-0015

Deanna Hofschulte

CONTACT

507-255-2972

Shawna L. Ehlers, PhD, LP

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >= 18-years
  • Stage III-IV melanoma and =< 2 month duration of this diagnosis
  • Able to read English sufficient to complete survey, informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Does not meet inclusion criteria

Treatment and study plan

Best Practice

Other

Receive SOC

Other names: standard of care, standard therapy

Cognitive Behavior Therapy

Behavioral

Attend CBT-C sessions

Other names: CBT, cognitive therapy, CT

Electronic Health Record Review

Other

Ancillary studies

Questionnaire Administration

Other

Complete QOL-MH questionnaires

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in FACT-M total score (Aim 1)

    Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

    The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Melanoma (FACT-M) is a 52-item questionnaire used to measures quality of life (QoL) in melanoma cancer patients. Responses to each item are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). Scores range from 0-108 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. For this study, 8 items have been omitted, so the number of items is 44, with total scores ranging from 0-176. Descriptive statistics will be used to tabulate and graph the observed total scores and the change from baseline total scores over time.

  2. Change in FACT-ICM total score (Aim 1)

    Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

    The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM) is a 25-item subscale that measures symptom burden and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the past 7 days in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Responses to each question are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater symptom burden and poorer quality of life. Descriptive statistics will be used to tabulate and graph the observed total scores and the change from baseline total scores over time.

  3. Change in Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R) score (Aim 1)

    Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

    The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) is a 22-item self-report measure designed to assess subjective distress related to stressful life events. The IES-R consists of 22 items for which participants rate how distressing each difficulty has been during the past 7 days with regard to their cancer diagnosis. Responses are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Extremely). Scores range from 0-88 with higher scores indicating greater distress. Descriptive statistics will be used to tabulate and graph the observed total scores and the change from baseline total scores over time.

  4. Change in IES-R score (Aim 2)

    Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

    The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) is a 22-item self-report measure designed to assess distress related to stressful life events. The IES-R consists of 22 items which participants rate distress over the past 7 days with regard to their cancer diagnosis. Responses are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Extremely). Scores range from 0-88 with higher scores indicating greater distress.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in PHQ-8 score

    Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) is a brief, self-report tool used to screen for and measure the severity of depression by asking about 8 depressive symptoms over the past two weeks, scoring from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) for each, with total scores indicating severity (e.g., 0-4 minimal, 10-14 moderate) and a score of 10 or more often suggesting major depression.

  2. Change in GAD-7 Anxiety score

    Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

    The General Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale is used to assess symptoms and feelings of anxiety over the past two weeks. The GAD-7 consists of 7 questions answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 21 where 0 indicates no anxiety, 1-4 indicates minimal anxiety, 5-9 indicates mild anxiety, 10-14 indicates moderate anxiety, and 15-21 indicates severe anxiety. If patients indicate any problems they are asked to indicate how difficult the problems have made daily life: not difficult at all, somewhat difficult, very difficult, or extremely difficult.

  3. Change in PSQI score

    Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)measures the severity of sleep disturbances. Possible scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome/more severe symptoms of sleep disturbance.

  4. Change in PROMIS: Fatigue score

    Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Fatigue questionnaire, a subscale of the PROMIS-29, measures fatigue and related symptoms over the past seven days. It consists of four items rated on a scale of 1(not at all) to 5 (very much). A higher score indicates greater experience of fatigue.

  5. Change in PROMIS: Pain Interference score

    Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

    The PROMIS: Pain Interference questionnaire, a subscale of the PROMIS-29, is used to assess pain interference in daily life over the past seven days. It consists of four items rated on a scale of 1(not at all) to 5 (very much). A higher score indicates greater levels of pain interference.

  6. Change in COST-FACIT score

    Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

    The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COSTFACIT) measures financial toxicity among cancer patients. This measure reflects five themes of financial toxicity which include: financial, resource, affect, coping, and effect on family. It consists of 12 questions, each answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much), with higher scores indicating greater financial toxicity.

  7. Change in MEPS score

    Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

    The Medical Expenditures Survey (MEPS) measures the financial impact of cancer, its treatment, or the lasting effects of that treatment. It consists of 5 multiple choice questions, including free text/ / fill-in options where appropriate. Results are reported descriptively. .

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Clinical Trials Referral Office

CONTACT

[email protected]

855-776-0015

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Launching the Era of Melanoma Survivorship: Defining Benchmarks in Quality of Life Inclusive of Mental Health (QOL-MH)

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2031
Study completion
2031
First posted
Jan 30, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 22, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.