Etokimab
DrugHumanized monoclonal antibody, administered by intravenous infusion
Other names: ANB020
NCT Number: NCT02920021
The purpose of this study is to determine etokimab safety, tolerability and activity in adult participants with peanut allergy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Stanford Univ. Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, United States
This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof of concept study to assess the safety and tolerability of etokimab in adult participants with peanut allergy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Humanized monoclonal antibody, administered by intravenous infusion
Other names: ANB020
Administered by intravenous infusion
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 45 days.
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation patient administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs include any clinical laboratory test results determined to be clinically significant by the investigator. AE was considered "serious" if there was any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect, other important medical events. Each AE was evaluated for severity (mild, moderate, or severe) and causal relationship to the study drug. AE was considered TEAE if the date of onset was during or after first dose of study treatment, or if the AE present at baseline worsened in either intensity or frequency after first dose of study treatment.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 14
Oral food challenges were performed at Baseline and Day 14 in accordance with the Practical Allergy (PRACTALL) consensus report. Escalating doses of peanut protein (peanut flour mixed with a non-allergic food vehicle such as apple sauce) consisting of 5, 20, 50, 100, 100, 100, and 125 mg (for a cumulative maximum dose of 500 mg) were given at 20 minute intervals. If the participant developed any signs of an objective allergic reaction, the challenge was stopped. The total cumulative tolerated dose of blinded peanut reached prior to reaction was recorded.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 14
Oral food challenges were performed at Baseline and Day 14 in accordance with the PRACTALL consensus report.
During OFC the OFC Symptom Scoring Assessment Tool was used to assess participants for common symptoms that can be suspected to be an allergic reaction involving the skin, upper respiratory, lower respiratory, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular systems. Each symptom was scored according to the following scale: Grade 0 = sign or symptom not observed; Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe. The score from each symptom was averaged to calculate the overall score at Baseline and on Day 14.
Time frame: Day 1 predose, 0.5 hours after the start of the infusion, end of infusion (EOI), 3 hours after EOI, 24, 96, 336 (Day 15), and 1056 (Day 45) hours after the start of infusion.
The concentration of etokimab was measured using a validated assay method. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.400 microgram per milliliter (μg/mL).
Time frame: Day 1 predose, 0.5 hours after the start of the infusion, EOI, 3 hours after EOI, 24, 96, 336 (Day 15), and 1056 (Day 45) hours after the start of infusion.
The concentration of etokimab was measured using a validated assay method. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.400 μg/mL.
Time frame: Day 1 predose, 0.5 hours after the start of the infusion, EOI, 3 hours after EOI, 24, 96, 336 (Day 15), and 1056 (Day 45) hours after the start of infusion.
Area under the concentration-time curve in serum from time zero (predose) extrapolated to infinite time, calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation and extrapolated to infinity by addition of the last quantifiable concentration (Clast) divided by the apparent terminal rate constant (λz): AUC(0-last) + Clast/λz.
Time frame: Day 1 predose, 0.5 hours after the start of the infusion, EOI, 3 hours after EOI, 24, 96, 336 (Day 15), and 1056 (Day 45) hours after the start of infusion.
Area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation.
Time frame: Day 1 predose, 0.5 hours after the start of the infusion, EOI, 3 hours after EOI, 24, 96, 336 (Day 15), and 1056 (Day 45) hours after the start of infusion.
Time frame: Day 1 predose, 0.5 hours after the start of the infusion, EOI, 3 hours after EOI, 24, 96, 336 (Day 15), and 1056 (Day 45) hours after the start of infusion.
Systemic clearance calculated as dose/ AUC(0-inf).
Time frame: Day 1 predose, 0.5 hours after the start of the infusion, EOI, 3 hours after EOI, 24, 96, 336 (Day 15), and 1056 (Day 45) hours after the start of infusion.
Volume of distribution at steady state following intravenous dosing, calculated as mean residence time (extrapolated to infinity) multiplied by systemic clearance.
Time frame: Day 1 predose, 0.5 hours after the start of the infusion, EOI, 3 hours after EOI, 24, 96, 336 (Day 15), and 1056 (Day 45) hours after the start of infusion.
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Volume of distribution was estimated by dividing the systemic clearance by apparent terminal rate constant (λz).
Time frame: Day 1 predose, 0.5 hours after the start of the infusion, EOI, 3 hours after EOI, 24, 96, 336 (Day 15), and 1056 (Day 45) hours after the start of infusion.
The terminal elimination rate constant (λz) is defined as the first-order rate constant describing the rate of decrease of drug concentration in the terminal phase. Apparent terminal rate constant was determined by linear regression of the terminal points of the log-linear concentration-time curve.
AnaptysBio, Inc.
Industry
Placebo-Controlled Proof of Concept Study to Investigate ANB020 Activity in Adult Patients With Peanut Allergy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03679676
Food Allergy, Food Hypersensitivity
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05440643
Food Hypersensitivity, Hypersensitivity
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02960074
Food Hypersensitivity, Hypersensitivity
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05138757
Anaphylaxis, Food Hypersensitivity
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details