Oral Lenacapavir
DrugTablets administered without regard to food
Other names: GS-6207
NCT Number: NCT04811040
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a combination of the broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) teropavimab (formerly GS-5423) and zinlirvimab (formerly GS-2872) in combination with the HIV capsid inhibitor lenacapavir (LEN).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Mills Clinical Research, Los Angeles, California, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
-- In both cohorts, teropavimab sensitivity is defined as 90% inhibitory concentration (IC90) ≤ 2 μg/mL; zinlirvimab sensitivity is defined as IC90 ≤ 2 μg/mL;
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Tablets administered without regard to food
Other names: GS-6207
Administered in the abdomen via subcutaneous injections
Other names: GS-6207
Administered intravenously
Other names: 3BNC117-LS, GS-5423
Administered intravenously
Other names: 10-1074-LS, GS-2872
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 26
A treatment emergent SAE was defined as an event that, at any dose, resulted in the following: death; life-threatening situation; in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly/birth defect; a medically important event or reaction: such events may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the subject or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes constituting SAEs. These events had an onset date on or after the study drug start date and prior to the last exposure date of long-acting (LA) regimen period for the LA regimen period analysis. The long acting regimen period included participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of the complete LA study drug regimen (ie, SC LEN + Teropavimab + Zinlirvimab).
Time frame: Week 26
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 26 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic outcome and included participants who had the last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL in the Week 26 analysis window. Week 26 window was between Days 176 and 224 (inclusive).
Time frame: Week 26
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 26 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic outcome and included participants a) who had the last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL in the Week 26 analysis window; b) who did not have on-treatment HIV-1 RNA data in the Week 26 analysis window and i) discontinued study drug prior to or in the Week 26 analysis window due to lack of efficacy, or ii) discontinued study drug prior to or in the Week 26 analysis window due to AE or death and had the last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL, or iii) discontinued study drug prior to or in the Week 26 analysis window due to reasons other than AE, death, or lack of efficacy and had the last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.
Week 26 window was between Days 176 and 224 (inclusive).
Time frame: Week 26
Anti-teropavimab antibodies positive participants are participants with positive treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody.
Time frame: Week 26
Anti-zinlirvimab antibodies positive participants are participants with positive treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 26
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 26
Participants in the Resistance Analysis Population analyzed for this outcome included any participant who had received 1 dose of study drug, maintained their study drug regimen, and met one of the following virologic failure criteria:
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 26
TEAEs were those adverse events that began on or after the first dose date of study drug and prior to last exposure date of LA regimen from participants who prematurely discontinued study or completed study, or any adverse events led to premature study drug discontinuation.
Time frame: Predose and at End of Infusion (EOI) of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26
AUC0-26 is defined as the concentration of drug over time from Week zero to Week 26.
Time frame: Predose and at EOI of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26
AUC0-26 is defined as the concentration of drug over time from Week zero to Week 26.
Time frame: Predose and at EOI of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 38, 52, up to end of study (up to Week 55)
AUClast is defined as the concentration of drug from time zero to the last observable concentration.
Time frame: Predose and at EOI of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 38, 52, up to end of study (up to Week 55)
AUClast is defined as the concentration of drug from time zero to the last observable concentration.
Time frame: Predose and at EOI of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 38, 52, up to end of study (up to Week 55)
T1/2 is defined as the estimate of the terminal elimination half-life of the drug.
Time frame: Predose and at EOI of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 38, 52, up to end of study (up to Week 55)
T1/2 is defined as the estimate of the terminal elimination half-life of the drug.
Time frame: Predose and at EOI of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 38, 52, up to end of study (up to Week 55)
T1/2 is defined as the estimate of the terminal elimination half-life of the drug.
Time frame: Predose and at EOI of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 38, 52, up to end of study (up to Week 55)
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug.
Time frame: Predose and at EOI of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 38, 52, up to end of study (up to Week 55)
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug.
Time frame: Predose and at EOI of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 38, 52, up to end of study (up to Week 55)
Tmax is defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax.
Time frame: Predose and at EOI of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 38, 52, up to end of study (up to Week 55)
Tmax is defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax.
Time frame: Predose and at EOI of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 38, 52, up to end of study (up to Week 55)
Tlast is defined as the time (observed time point) of Clast (the last observable concentration of drug).
Time frame: Predose and at EOI of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 38, 52, up to end of study (up to Week 55)
Tlast is defined as the time (observed time point) of Clast (the last observable concentration of drug).
Time frame: Predose and at EOI of teropavimab and zinlirvimab on Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 38, 52, up to end of study (up to Week 55)
Tlast is defined as the time (observed time point) of Clast (the last observable concentration of drug).
Time frame: Week 26
C26week is the concentration at week 26.
Time frame: Week 26
C26week is the concentration at week 26.
Time frame: Week 26
C26week is the concentration at week 26.
Gilead Sciences
Industry
A Phase 1b Randomized, Blinded, Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies (bNAbs) GS-5423 and GS-2872 in Combination With Capsid Inhibitor Lenacapavir (GS-6207) in Virologically Suppressed Adults With HIV-1 Infection
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04233879
HIV-1 Infection
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02906137
HIV-1 Infection
Toulouse, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01453192
Chronic Disease, Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04133012
HIV-1 Infection
Clamart, France
View Trial Details