Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of NKTR-102 in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Ovarian Cancer

The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.0 based upon the best response as assessed by the Investigator. CR was defined by RECIST 1.1 as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined by RECIST 1.1 as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. The analysis was performed for patients in the Primary Efficacy Population.

Best overall response was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR as assessed per GCIG criteria. The GCIG proposed the following definition for the date of progression which used both the RECIST and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) criteria. "A response according to CA-125 has occurred if there is ≥ 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from a pretreatment sample. The response had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. Patients can be evaluated according to CA-125 only if they had a pretreatment sample that was at least twice the upper limit of normal (ULN) and within 2 weeks prior to starting treatment." Analysis was performed in MITT Population.

Best overall response was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per assessed per GCIG criteria. The GCIG proposed the following definition for the date of progression which used both the RECIST and CA-125 criteria. "A response according to CA-125 has occurred if there is ≥ 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from a pretreatment sample. The response had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. Patients can be evaluated according to CA-125 only if they had a pretreatment sample that was at least twice the ULN and within 2 weeks prior to starting treatment." Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.

Best overall response was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per assessed per GCIG criteria. The GCIG proposed the following definition for the date of progression which used both the RECIST and CA-125 criteria. "A response according to CA-125 has occurred if there is ≥ 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from a pretreatment sample. The response had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. Patients can be evaluated according to CA-125 only if they had a pretreatment sample that was at least twice the ULN and within 2 weeks prior to starting treatment." Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.

Best overall response was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per assessed per GCIG criteria. The GCIG proposed the following definition for the date of progression which used both the RECIST and CA-125 criteria. "A response according to CA-125 has occurred if there is ≥ 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from a pretreatment sample. The response had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. Patients can be evaluated according to CA-125 only if they had a pretreatment sample that was at least twice the ULN and within 2 weeks prior to starting treatment." Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.

According to enhanced RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was the appearance of one or more new lesions, OR an unambiguous increase in the sum of target lesion volumes with both 1) >20% increase in the sum of volumes (SOV) of all target lesions (taking as reference the nadir) and 2) greater than two times the variability of the measurements estimated by the sponsor and/or its designees.

PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first NKTR-102 administration to the date of PD or death due to any cause. Progressive disease was determined by Investigators using RECIST criteria. Patients who were alive without disease progression at the time of data-cut-off were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment that demonstrated a lack of disease progression (or on Cycle 1 Day 1 if the patient did not undergo repeated imaging while on study). Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.

PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first NKTR-102 administration to the date of PD or death due to any cause. Progressive disease was determined by Investigators using RECIST criteria. Patients who were alive without disease progression at the time of data-cut-off were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment that demonstrated a lack of disease progression (or on Cycle 1 Day 1 if the patient did not undergo repeated imaging while on study). Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.

PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first NKTR-102 administration to the date of PD or death due to any cause. Progressive disease was determined by Investigators using RECIST criteria. Patients who were alive without disease progression at the time of data-cut-off were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment that demonstrated a lack of disease progression (or on Cycle 1 Day 1 if the patient did not undergo repeated imaging while on study). Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Population.

DoR was defined as the time from the first documented CR or PR, the date of PD (assessed by central radiological review according to RECIST), or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Patients who were alive without documented PD per RECIST were censored at the date of last tumor assessment without disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy for the study disease, whichever was earlier. Analysis was performed in MITT Population.

DoR was defined as the time from the first documented CR or PR, the date of PD (assessed by central radiological review according to RECIST), or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Patients who were alive without documented PD per RECIST were censored at the date of last tumor assessment without disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy for the study disease, whichever was earlier. Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.

DoR was defined as the time from the first documented CR or PR, the date of PD (assessed by central radiological review according to RECIST), or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Patients who were alive without documented PD per RECIST were censored at the date of last tumor assessment without disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy for the study disease, whichever was earlier. Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.

DoR was defined as the time from the first documented CR or PR, the date of PD (assessed by central radiological review according to RECIST), or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Patients who were alive without documented PD per RECIST were censored at the date of last tumor assessment without disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy for the study disease, whichever was earlier. Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.

CA-125 response was determined by having achieved a ≥50% reduction in serum levels of CA-125 from a pre-treatment level of at least twice the ULN within 2 weeks of starting treatment according to the GCIG criteria. The CA-125 response rate was calculated as the number of patients meeting the endpoint definition divided by the total number of eligible patients per the GCIG criteria for CA-125 in the analysis population. Analysis was performed in MITT Population.

CA-125 response was determined by having achieved a ≥50% reduction in serum levels of CA-125 from a pre-treatment level of at least twice the ULN within 2 weeks of starting treatment according to the GCIG criteria. The CA-125 response rate was calculated as the number of patients meeting the endpoint definition divided by the total number of eligible patients per the GCIG criteria for CA-125 in the analysis population. Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.

CA-125 response was determined by having achieved a ≥50% reduction in serum levels of CA-125 from a pre-treatment level of at least twice the ULN within 2 weeks of starting treatment according to the GCIG criteria. The CA-125 response rate was calculated as the number of patients meeting the endpoint definition divided by the total number of eligible patients per the GCIG criteria for CA-125 in the analysis population. Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.

CA-125 response was determined by having achieved a ≥50% reduction in serum levels of CA-125 from a pre-treatment level of at least twice the ULN within 2 weeks of starting treatment according to the GCIG criteria. The CA-125 response rate was calculated as the number of patients meeting the endpoint definition divided by the total number of eligible patients per the GCIG criteria for CA-125 in the analysis population. Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.

Clinical benefit rate was calculated as the number of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or SD (where the duration of SD should be ≥ 3 months) by RECIST divided by the total number of measurable patients in the population. Analysis was performed in MITT Population.

Clinical benefit rate was calculated as the number of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or SD (where the duration of SD should be ≥ 3 months) by RECIST divided by the total number of measurable patients in the population. Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.

Clinical benefit rate was calculated as the number of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or SD (where the duration of SD should be ≥ 3 months) by RECIST divided by the total number of measurable patients in the population. Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.

Clinical benefit rate was calculated as the number of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or SD (where the duration of SD should be ≥ 3 months) by RECIST divided by the total number of measurable patients in the population. Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.

Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization. Analysis was performed in MITT Population.

Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization. Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.

Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization. Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.

Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization. Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.

The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per RECIST 1.0 based upon the best response as assessed by the Investigator assessment. The analysis was performed for patients in the MITT Population.

The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per RECIST 1.0 based upon the best response as assessed by the Investigator assessment. The analysis was performed for patients in the PLD Population.

The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per RECIST 1.0 based upon the best response as assessed by the Investigator assessment. The analysis was performed for patients in the Platinum-Refractory Population.