FTC/RPV/TDF
DrugEmtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/rilpivirine (RPV) 25 mg/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg single-tablet regimen administered orally once daily with a meal
Other names: Complera®, Eviplera®
NCT Number: NCT01309243
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the emtricitabine (FTC)/rilpivirine (RPV)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) single-tablet regimen (STR) compared with the efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF STR in HIV-1 infected adults who had not previously received treatment with antiretroviral medications.
Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive one of the study treatments. Randomization was stratified by HIV-1 RNA level (≤ 100,000 copies/mL or > 100,000 copies/mL) at screening. A treatment duration of 96 weeks was planned, with the option for subjects in FTC/RPV/TDF STR arm to receive treatment following the Week 96 visit until FTC/RPV/TDF STR is commercially available or until Gilead Sciences elects to terminate development in that country.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Holdsworth House Medical Practice, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/rilpivirine (RPV) 25 mg/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg single-tablet regimen administered orally once daily with a meal
Other names: Complera®, Eviplera®
Efavirenz (EFV) 600 mg/FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg single-tablet regimen administered orally once daily on an empty stomach, preferably at bedtime
Other names: Atripla®
Time frame: Week 48
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the US FDA snapshot algorithm.
The snapshot algorithm defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 96
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the US FDA snapshot algorithm.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: Baseline to Week 96
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: Baseline to Week 96
Participants who experienced either suboptimal virologic response or virologic rebound were considered to have virologic failure and were analyzed for resistance. Suboptimal virologic response was assessed at Week 8 and was defined as having HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL and < 1-log10 reduction from baseline at the Week 8 visit, which was confirmed at the subsequent visit. Virologic rebound was defined as having 2 consecutive visits with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL after achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL, or as having 2 consecutive visits with > 1 log10 increase in HIV-1 RNA from their nadir. In addition, subjects who were on study drugs, had not been analyzed previously, and who had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 48, Week 96, or their last visit (at or after Week 8) were also analyzed for resistance at their last visit. Subsequent to the first resistance testing, subjects experiencing repeated confirmed virologic failure were assessed for resistance retesting on a case-by-case basis.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 96
Resistance Analysis Set: participants with either suboptimal virologic response or virologic rebound were considered to have virologic failure and were analyzed. Suboptimal virologic response was assessed at Week 8 and was defined as having HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL and < 1-log10 reduction from baseline at the Week 8 visit, which was confirmed at the subsequent visit. Virologic rebound was defined as having 2 consecutive visits with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL after achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL, or as having 2 consecutive visits with > 1 log10 increase in HIV-1 RNA from their nadir. In addition, subjects who were on study drugs, had not been analyzed previously, and who had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 48, Week 96, or their last visit (at or after Week 8) were also analyzed for resistance at their last visit. Subsequent to the first resistance testing, subjects experiencing repeated confirmed virologic failure were assessed for resistance retesting on a case-by-case basis.
Gilead Sciences
Industry
A Phase 3B, Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Single Tablet Regimen of Emtricitabine/Rilpivirine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Compared With a Single Tablet Regimen of Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04233879
HIV-1 Infection
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02906137
HIV-1 Infection
Toulouse, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01453192
Chronic Disease, Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04133012
HIV-1 Infection
Clamart, France
View Trial Details