GSK Investigational Site
Fortaleza, Ceará, 60430 160, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT01391819
The aim of this study is to establish an active surveillance in order to generate dengue disease burden estimates including incidence rates, prevalence data, clinical presentation and cost of illness in Forteleza (Brazil).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me5 year–13 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Fortaleza, Ceará, 60430 160, Brazil
Prospective cohort study.
The study period initially planned to be two years, is extended by one year to cover one additional dengue season.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Socio-demographic information, medical history, yellow fever vaccination history and dengue suspicion data collection.
A blood sample will be collected at each of the three scheduled study visits and any time during the study that dengue is suspected. Samples collected at scheduled visits will be tested for anti-dengue antibodies. Samples collected at visits for dengue suspicion will be tested for dengue diagnosis.
Time frame: At Year 1 (2012)
Laboratory-confirmed dengue infection refers to suspected symptomatic dengue cases with positive dengue virus identification or serologic evidence of dengue infection through dengue virus identification through Reverse Transcriptase quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) from first blood sample or anti-dengue Immunoglobulin type M/G (IgM/G) seroconversions between first and second blood sampling. Note: In the study report the denominator for incidence estimation has not been expressed as an absolute number of subjects, but in person-years. Therefore, the category "number of subjects analysed" has been populated with the number of enrolled subjects attended the study visit after the specified season and in each age stratum.
Time frame: At Year 2 (2013)
Laboratory-confirmed dengue infection refers to suspected symptomatic dengue cases with positive dengue virus identification or serologic evidence of dengue infection through dengue virus identification through Reverse Transcriptase quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) from first blood sample or anti-dengue Immunoglobulin type M/G (IgM/G) seroconversions between first and second blood sampling. Note: In the study report the denominator for incidence estimation has not been expressed as an absolute number of subjects, but in person-years. Therefore, the category "number of subjects analysed" has been populated with the number of enrolled subjects attended the study visit after the specified season and in each age stratum.
Time frame: At Year 3 (2014)
Laboratory-confirmed dengue infection refers to suspected symptomatic dengue cases with positive dengue virus identification or serologic evidence of dengue infection through dengue virus identification through Reverse Transcriptase quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) from first blood sample or anti-dengue Immunoglobulin type M/G (IgM/G) seroconversions between first and second blood sampling. Note: In the study report the denominator for incidence estimation has not been expressed as an absolute number of subjects, but in person-years. Therefore, the category "number of subjects analysed" has been populated with the number of enrolled subjects attended the study visit after the specified season and in each age stratum.
Time frame: At Day 0 (At enrollment)
This outcome measures the occurrence of past dengue infections among subjects who had laboratory results. Proportion was estimated from logistic generalized estimating equations models (GEE) taking the clustering effect of the school into account and was presented per subject enrolment age. Immune response against dengue was assessed via Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA).
Time frame: From Day 0 to Year 3
Asymptomatic dengue primary infection was defined as a documented seroconversion (anti-dengue IgG antibodies) between two sequential sera samples obtained during the scheduled visits, without suspicion of dengue. Proportion of asymptomatic dengue primary infection was analyzed among subjects who had no past dengue infection reported before the beginning of the period.
Time frame: From Year 0 to Year 3
A case of primary or secondary symptomatic dengue infection was defined as laboratory confirmed or probable symptomatic dengue case whose previous sample collected at scheduled Visits 1- 4 (Day 0- Year 3) to detect anti-dengue IgG antibodies was seronegative or seropositive, respectively. A probable dengue case was defined as a suspected symptomatic dengue case with the following laboratory findings: -anti-dengue IgM or anti-dengue IgG positivity in at least one sample (in either blood sample 1 or 2) AND no evidence of viremia (negative dengue virus identification through RT-qPCR) in blood sample 1 AND no evidence of anti-dengue Ig M or IgG seroconversion between blood sample 1 and blood sample 2.
Time frame: At Year 1 (2012)
Incidence of laboratory confirmed or probable symptomatic dengue infection was assessed by calendar year and age strata. Note: In the study report the denominator for incidence estimation has not been expressed as an absolute number of subjects, but in person-years. Therefore, the category "number of subjects analysed" has been populated with the number of enrolled subjects attended the study visit after the specified season and in each age stratum.
Time frame: At Year 2 (2013)
Incidence of laboratory confirmed or probable symptomatic dengue infection was assessed by calendar year and age strata. Note: In the study report the denominator for incidence estimation has not been expressed as an absolute number of subjects, but in person-years. Therefore, the category "number of subjects analysed" has been populated with the number of enrolled subjects attended the study visit after the specified season and in each age stratum.
Time frame: At Year 3 (2014)
Incidence of laboratory confirmed or probable symptomatic dengue infection was assessed by calendar year and age strata. Note: In the study report the denominator for incidence estimation has not been expressed as an absolute number of subjects, but in person-years. Therefore, the category "number of subjects analysed" has been populated with the number of enrolled subjects attended the study visit after the specified season and in each age stratum.
Time frame: From Day 0 to Year 3
Among virus types causing dengue infection were DENV-4 in 2012 and 2013 and DENV-1 in 2014, as assessed by PCR.
Time frame: At Year 1 (2012)
Primary symptomatic dengue infection cases are defined as laboratory confirmed symptomatic dengue cases whose previous sample collected at scheduled visits to detect anti-dengue IgG antibodies were seronegative. Analysis was done by calendar year and age strata. Note: In the study report the denominator for incidence estimation has not been expressed as an absolute number of subjects, but in person-years. Therefore the category "number of subjects analysed" has been populated with the number of enrolled subjects seronegative for anti-dengue IgG antibodies before the specified season and attended the study visit after the specified season, and in each age stratum.
Time frame: At Year 2 (2013)
Primary symptomatic dengue infection cases are defined as laboratory confirmed symptomatic dengue cases whose previous sample collected at scheduled visits to detect anti-dengue IgG antibodies were seronegative. Analysis was done by calendar year and age strata. Note: In the study report the denominator for incidence estimation has not been expressed as an absolute number of subjects, but in person-years. Therefore the category "number of subjects analysed" has been populated with the number of enrolled subjects seronegative for anti-dengue IgG antibodies before the specified season and attended the study visit after the specified season, and in each age stratum.
Time frame: At Year 3 (2014)
Primary symptomatic dengue infection cases are defined as laboratory confirmed symptomatic dengue cases whose previous sample collected at scheduled visits to detect anti-dengue IgG antibodies were seronegative. Analysis was done by calendar year and age strata. Note: In the study report the denominator for incidence estimation has not been expressed as an absolute number of subjects, but in person-years. Therefore the category "number of subjects analysed" has been populated with the number of enrolled subjects seronegative for anti-dengue IgG antibodies before the specified season and attended the study visit after the specified season, and in each age stratum.
Time frame: At Year 1 (2012)
Secondary symptomatic dengue infection cases are defined as laboratory confirmed symptomatic dengue cases whose previous sample collected at scheduled visits to detect anti-dengue IgG antibodies were seropositive. Note: In the study report the denominator for incidence estimation has not been expressed as an absolute number of subjects, but in person-years. Therefore the category "number of subjects analysed" has been populated with the number of enrolled subjects seropositive for anti-dengue IgG antibodies before the specified season and attended the study visit after the specified season, and in each age stratum.
Time frame: At Year 2 (2013)
Secondary symptomatic dengue infection cases are defined as laboratory confirmed symptomatic dengue cases whose previous sample collected at scheduled visits to detect anti-dengue IgG antibodies were seropositive. Note: In the study report the denominator for incidence estimation has not been expressed as an absolute number of subjects, but in person-years. Therefore the category "number of subjects analysed" has been populated with the number of enrolled subjects seropositive for anti-dengue IgG antibodies before the specified season and attended the study visit after the specified season, and in each age stratum.
Time frame: At Year 3 (2014)
Secondary symptomatic dengue infection cases are defined as laboratory confirmed symptomatic dengue cases whose previous sample collected at scheduled visits to detect anti-dengue IgG antibodies were seropositive. Note: In the study report the denominator for incidence estimation has not been expressed as an absolute number of subjects, but in person-years. Therefore the category "number of subjects analysed" has been populated with the number of enrolled subjects seropositive for anti-dengue IgG antibodies before the specified season and attended the study visit after the specified season, and in each age stratum.
Time frame: From 21 up to 35 days post laboratory confirmed dengue onset
The number of days off work from caregiver were recorded as part of health economics indirect resource utilization associated with symptomatic dengue infection.
Time frame: From 21 up to 35 days post laboratory confirmed dengue onset
The number of days off work from caregiver were recorded as part of health economics indirect resource utilization associated with symptomatic dengue infection.
Time frame: From 21 up to 35 days post laboratory confirmed dengue onset
The number of laboratory confirmed dengue infections with primary caregivers missing from work was recorded as part of health economics indirect resource utilization associated with symptomatic dengue infection.
Time frame: From 21 up to 35 days post laboratory confirmed dengue onset
The number of school days missed by subjects due to dengue infection were recorded as part of the dengue active surveillance and indirect resource utilization associated with symptomatic dengue infection.
Time frame: From 21 up to 35 days post laboratory confirmed dengue onset
The number of laboratory confirmed dengue infection cases with subjects missing from school due to dengue infection were recorded as part of the dengue active surveillance and indirect resource utilization associated with symptomatic dengue infection.
Time frame: From Day 0 to Year 3
Serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected on the enrolled subjects. SAEs assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study subject.
Time frame: From Day 0 to Year 3
Direct medical resource included hospitalization, stay in intensive care units (ICU), medications, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures
Time frame: From Day 0 to Year 3
Length of hospitalization was part of the direct medical resource, associated with dengue infection.
Time frame: From Day 0 to Year 3
Temperature, expressed in degrees Celsius (°C), was among symptoms of symptomatic dengue infection.
Time frame: From Day 0 to Year 3
Temperature intervals assessed varied from hypothermia 33.5 to 36.4 degrees Celsius (°C), to normal temperature 36.5-35.9 °C and hyperthermia 37 - 39.9 °C, or were unknown.
Time frame: From Day 0 to Year 3
Dengue related clinical symptoms included general symptoms, digestive symptoms, respiratory symptoms, hemorrhagic symptoms and any other signs among first symptoms.
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
An Epidemiological Study to Evaluate the Incidence, Clinical Characteristics and Economic Burden of Dengue in Brazilian Children
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06121934
Arbovirus Infections, Dengue
Dhaka, Bangladesh
View Trial DetailsNCT07517731
Aedes-borne Diseases, Alphavirus Infections
Cúcuta, Norte de Satander, Colombia
View Trial DetailsNCT04478370
Arbovirus Infections, Dengue
Mae Sot, Changwat Tak, Thailand
View Trial DetailsNCT06837116
Arbovirus Infections, Dengue
Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, Thailand
View Trial Details