RPH-104
Biologicalsolution for subcutaneous administration 40 mg/mL, 2 mL in the 4-mL transparent glass vial
NCT Number: NCT04692766
The goal of this study was to evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RPH-104 Treatment in patients in comparison to placebo with Idiopathic Recurrent Pericarditis
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Federal Budgetary Healthcare Institution Orenburg Regional Clinical Hospital, Orenburg, Russia
The study included the following periods:
The treatment response during the run-in treatment period was defined as the resolution of the relapse observed at enrollment in the study, and the absence of new relapses of pericarditis in patients enrolled in the study with signs of pericarditis recurrence; absence of new relapses of pericarditis in patients enrolled without signs of relapse. In the absence of treatment response assessed on Day 14 of the study and then during the preparatory open-label period, the use of RPH-104 in patients was discontinued, and they were prescribed treatment with other drugs at the Investigator's choice.
After two weeks of open-label therapy (starting from Day 14 of the run-in treatment period), patients with a response to the study drug treatment began to discontinue the previous treatment of the underlying disease. Monotherapy with NSAIDs, colchicine, or their combination was discontinued simultaneously. The GCS dose was gradually tapered over 12 weeks with subsequent complete discontinuation (thus, these patients received RPH-104 in combination with GCS for 14 weeks and RPH-104 as monotherapy for the next 10 weeks).
The patients who demonstrated response to therapy with RPH-104 during the run-in treatment period, were transferred to the randomized withdrawal period.
In case of recurrence of pericarditis during the period of randomized withdrawal (regarded as a lack of response), the treatment group was unblinded. Patients in the placebo group were prescribed open-label therapy with RPH-104 as a single dose of 160 mg subcutaneously (first injection), followed by administration of 80 mg every 7 days, 14 days after the first injection. Also, at the Investigator's discretion, the use of NSAIDs and/or colchicine was allowed for relapse treatment in these patients. The response to therapy in such patients was assessed 3 days and 7 days after the first open-label injection of the study drug, according to the results of which, if the relapse was not resolved, the same treatment regimen was continued (including NSAIDs and/or colchicine). Evaluation of the drug efficacy in these patients was carried out 14 days after switching to active study drug treatment. In case of resolution of the developed relapse, the use of NSAIDs/colchicine was to be discontinued simultaneously, the use of the study drug was to be continued at a dose of 80 mg once every other week with an efficacy assessment every 4 weeks until the end of the randomized withdrawal period of the study.
Patients from the RPH-104 group (as well as patients from the placebo group who were switched to the study drug therapy due to a disease recurrence, those in whom the recurrence did not resolve within 14 days, or patients who developed a new recurrence after the resolution of the previous one) were switched to treatment with other drugs at the discretion of the Investigator; these patients had to come to a follow-up safety visit in 2 and 8 weeks after the administration of the last dose of the study drug.
Thus, after the end of randomized withdrawal period, the patients who responded to therapy with RPH-104 were asked to transfer to the open-label study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of RPH-104. Non-responders, as well as patients who did not agree to participate in the open-label study of safety and efficacy, had to come to follow-up safety visits.
Thus, the maximum duration of treatment in this study was 36 weeks (for patients who were receiving NSAIDs and/or colchicine at the study enrollment) and 48 weeks (as a monotherapy or in combination with NSAIDs and/or colchicine).
The total maximal duration of the study was planned to be approximately 60 weeks.
A total of 20 patients with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis were planned to be randomized into the study. Taking into account potential dropouts during the screening and the run-in treatment period, the number of screened patients (signing the Informed Consent Form) could be as large as 35.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
OR Consent of sexually active male subjects to use highly effective contraceptive methods throughout the study, starting from the beginning of the screening and for at least 8 weeks after discontinuation of the study drug.
Highly effective methods of contraception include the following:
Exclusion criteria
solution for subcutaneous administration 40 mg/mL, 2 mL in the 4-mL transparent glass vial
Normal Saline (0.9% Sodium Chloride solution for Injection), 5 mL in a polypropylene ampoule, 10 ampoules per labeled package
Time frame: up to 24 weeks after randomization
Time (days) to the recurrence within 24 weeks after randomization in patients with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis treated with RPH-104 compared to placebo.
Time frame: Day 3, Day 7, Day 14 of the run-in treatment period
Proportion of patients demonstrating a response to RPH-104 treatment on Day 3, Day 7, Day 14 of the run-in treatment period
Time frame: Day 3, Day 7, Day 14 of the run-in treatment period
The proportion of patients switched to active treatment with RPH-104 due to the development of a relapse during the period of randomized withdrawal, with a response to treatment in 3 days, 7 and 14 days after the study drug administration.
Time frame: up to 24 weeks
Proportion of patients with pericarditis recurrence throughout the run-in treatment period.
Time frame: up to 24 weeks
Proportion of patients, treated with RPH-104, with pericarditis recurrence within 24 weeks after the randomization, compared to placebo.
Time frame: up to 24 weeks
Proportion of patients who completely discontinued corticosteroids within 12 weeks following the response to therapy throughout the run-in treatment period
Time frame: from Day 0 up to 24 weeks
Change in chest pain from baseline (Day 0 of the run-in treatment period) assessed by the patients using a numeric rating scale (NRS) during the run-in treatment period.
NRS contains 11 values from 0 to 10 points, where 0 is no pain, 10 is unbearable pain.
Time frame: from Day 0 of the randomized withdrawal period up to 24 weeks
Change in chest pain from the assessment on the Day 0 of the randomized withdrawal period assessed by the patients using NRS during the randomized withdrawal period in patients treated with RPH-104 compared to placebo.
NRS contains 11 values from 0 to 10 points, where 0 is no pain, 10 is unbearable pain.
Time frame: from Day 0 of up to 24 weeks
Change in C-reactive protein (CRP) level from baseline (Day 0 of the run-in treatment period) during the run-in treatment period.
Time frame: from Day 0 of the randomized withdrawal period up to 24 weeks
Change of the CRP level from Day 0 of the randomized withdrawal period during the randomized withdrawal period for RPH-104 administration versus placebo.
Time frame: from Day 0 up to 24 weeks
Change of the size of pericardial effusion from baseline (Day 0 of the run-in treatment period) based on Echo-CG data during the run-in treatment period.
Time frame: from Day 0 of the randomized withdrawal period up to 24 weeks
Change of the size of pericardial effusion according to the echocardiography data from Day 0 of the randomized withdrawal period during the randomized withdrawal period for RPH-104 administration versus placebo.
Time frame: from Day 0 up to 24 weeks
Change in physician global assessment of disease activity from baseline (Day 0 of the run-in treatment period) assessed using a numeric rating scale during the run-in treatment period.
Global disease activity is assessed by the physician using a NRS containing 11 values from 0 to 10 points, where 0 is the absence of active disease, 10 is the maximum activity of the disease.
Time frame: from Day 0 of the randomized withdrawal period up to 24 weeks
Change in physician global assessment of disease activity from the assessment on the Day 0 of the randomized withdrawal period assessed using a numeric rating scale during the randomized withdrawal period in patients treated with RPH-104 compared to placebo.
Global disease activity is assessed by the physician using a NRS containing 11 values from 0 to 10 points, where 0 is the absence of active disease, 10 is the maximum activity of the disease.
Time frame: from Day 0 up to 24 weeks
Change from baseline (Day 0 of the preparatory therapy period) of the patient's overall health self-assessment on the numerical rating scale during the preparatory therapy period.
The patient's overall health is assessed using a NRS containing 11 values from 0 to 10 points, where 0 is very good, 10 is very poor.
Time frame: from Day 0 of the randomized withdrawal period up to 24 weeks
Change of the patient's overall health self-assessment on the numerical rating scale from Day 0 of the randomized withdrawal period during the randomized withdrawal period of RPH-104 administration versus placebo.
Time frame: from Day 0 up to 24 weeks
Change in quality of life from baseline (Day 0 of the run-in treatment period) based on data of the SF-36® questionnaire during the run-in treatment period
Time frame: from Day 0 of the randomized withdrawal period up to 24 weeks
Change in quality of life from the assessment on the Day 0 of the randomized withdrawal period based on data of the SF-36 questionnaire during the randomized withdrawal period in patients treated with RPH-104 compared to placebo.
R-Pharm International, LLC
Industry
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RPH-104 Treatment in Patients With Idiopathic Recurrent Pericarditis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06731595
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01395082
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiovascular Diseases
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04906720
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02083510
Arthritis, Cardiovascular Diseases
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial Details